File talk:Everybody Votes channel spoken (en).ogg
Spoken article quality assessment
[edit]Version reviewed: 03 April 2010
Technical quality: Low
- Too much white noise in the background.
- It seemed that you leaned in and moved back from the microphone that you were using.
- Sometimes you seemed bored, and the vocal tones reflected this.
Clarity: Low
- Enunciation was not there.
- Deep breaths took away from the article.
- Words ran together.
Accuracy: High
- Read word for word from the page and did not differ from it.
- Reading from the content boxes could have been a little clearer.
Notes: {{{notes}}}
Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.
Reviewed by: Fumitol (talk) 03:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)