File talk:Mickey Virus Official Poster 2013.jpg

The newest version of a poster prior to theatrical release in country of origin is used on movie articles, as it is considered the definitive version. Why do you keep reverting? Film Fan 23:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will get back on the matter soon. Please give me some time. Sohambanerjee1998 06:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Film Fan, please give a link to the policy where this defition is given. Sohambanerjee1998 09:18, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. But you yourself have been using this reason for other posters and whether or not it's written, it's simply how it's done. Why should an exception be made because you prefer the version you uploaded? Film Fan 13:15, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to Ram-Leela poster that I uploaded was not because of New poster but the previous one was a teaser with tentative title while this one also features the title with tagline and music out now'. In these aspects it was the newer and theatrical poster. Not because I say them to be in the edit summary. Please provide any of the aforementioned aspects in the poster you uploaded explicitly so that I don't have to revert you again. Believe me I have lots of other works to do instead of arguing over such a petty matter with you dobaara! Sohambanerjee1998 13:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Film Fan, if we continue to do this at the end of the day we make the jobs of the admins even more tiring and irritating. They are humans also and they don't have much time to delete use useless orphaned non-free revisions uploaded without any reason. So if not for my wiki-happiness's sake please stop doing this at least for some/"a" good administrator's sake (one might be stalking this page). Sohambanerjee1998 13:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I quite agree. Why do you oppose the new poster? Film Fan 20:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't oppose it but I think its quite unnecessary and not new. Sohambanerjee1998 05:07, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you just say that then? It IS new. And certainly newer than your version, which says "uploading soon", while these newer versions have "October 25th" on them. Do we have to keep doing this? Film Fan 15:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on you. New New and new! if thats all you have to say, please provide me a reliable source, a policy that clearly states that this version is the new one and newer posters should be used respectively. Please I beg to you to provide these so that I can concentrate on real editing.

PS - Please turn your caps lock off so that you don't come off as rude and uncivilized person as caps in internet etiquette is considered to be shouting. Sohambanerjee1998 17:18, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is this caps lock? Didn't think so. Impawards is a reliable source and is linked to in the description. The policy is being worked on, but you keep changing your mind about which bit you disagree with, so it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Film Fan 18:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, keep plucking things out of mid-air and one day who knows you might beat PC Sorcar to his game. :-] At least provide me the draft of the working policy. Sohambanerjee1998 18:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the information: Template:Infobox film/doc#Image. It states that the film's original theatrical release poster is the one to use. I have now blocked Film Fan for edit warring, after seeing this upload . -- Diannaa (talk) 22:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]