Jump to content

File talk:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit request on 21 November 2013

[edit]

Please change the status of the copyright to: {{GFDL|migration=relicense}}
Source: commons:File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 01:14, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I've also ported {{Wikimedia trademark}} from Commons to accurately reflect the image's restricted status. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 7 September 2014

[edit]

Hello, as you stated that in Wikipedia's logo rights, logos that are an official design of The Wikimedia Foundation are copyrighted with all rights reserved, but in the licence description {{Non-free Wikimedia logo}} has been removed by User:Mr. Stradivarius, an admin who responded to another person's edit request. The edit where somebody changed the licence description to GFDL on Commons had been reverted to the "copyrighted by Wikimedia" notice. Could you or any administrator please put this copyright notice back? DSCrowned(Talk) 04:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done When I changed this to GFDL I think I was just following the decision made on Commons. I've removed {{Wikimedia trademark}} as well, as that seems redundant to {{Non-free Wikimedia logo}}. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:53, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong license

[edit]

Hi, Please update the license. See c:File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: What should the licence be updated to? — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I mean to link to the file on Commons. Actually, this could be deleted. We have the same file with the same name on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The image was uploaded locally and protected because it is highly used. If this was just to prevent image vandalism then we could delete it here and apply create protection, but I think keeping the image local has a performance advantage as well. I'd have to check for the exact details of how this affects performance, though. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 17:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 2 October 2016

[edit]

Needs to be deleted from commons as the file violates copyright as its a logo and more complex so it cant be allowed on commons unless wikipedia allows ir

100.40.100.222 (talk) 16:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a question for this page, and moreover as you can see from the This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. the file is under a free license and thus OK. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 10 December 2023

[edit]

Please allow me to edit, admin, etc.. Nesshunter (talk) 01:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 28 September 2024

[edit]

Please copy the {{information}} from Commons below the {{Keep local high-risk}}: 

==Summary==
{{Information
|Description=New Wikipedia’s logo. See also [[:File:Wikipedia wordmark.svg]] for the wordmark, and [[:File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-wordmark.svg]] for the logo+wordmark.
|Date=2010-05-12
|Source=[[:File:Wikipedia-logo.svg]] as of [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/80/20100615232840!Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg 14 May 2010T23:16:42]
|Author=Version 1 by [[meta:User:Nohat|Nohat]] (concept by [[meta:User:Paullusmagnus|Paullusmagnus]]); Wikimedia.
}}

Thanks, Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 20:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Izno (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg&oldid=1253194288"