Gallardo v. Marstiller
| Gallardo v. Marstiller | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued January 10, 2022 Decided June 6, 2022 | |
| Full case name | Gianinna Gallardo, an Incapacitated Person, By and Through Her Parents and Co-Guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo v. Simone Marstiller, In Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration |
| Docket no. | 20-1263 |
| Citations | 596 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett |
| Dissent | Sotomayor, joined by Breyer |
| Laws applied | |
| Medicaid Act | |
Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case that held the Medicaid Act permits a state to seek reimbursement from settlement payments allocated for future medical care. The case was brought by the parents of Gianinna Gallardo, who was in a persistent vegetative state.[1][2]
References
[edit]- ^ "Gallardo v. Marstiller". Oyez.
- ^ "Justices validate states' right to take tort recoveries from Medicaid beneficiaries". SCOTUSblog. June 6, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2024.
External links
[edit]- Text of Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |