Ground-directed bombing (GDB) is a military tactic for airstrikes by ground-attack aircraft, strategic bombers, and other equipped air vehicles under command guidance from aviation ground support equipment and/or ground personnel (e.g., ground observers). Often used in poor weather and at night (75% of all Vietnam War bombings "were done with precision [sic] GDB"), the tactic was superseded by an airborne computer predicting unguided bomb impact from data provided by precision avionics (e.g., GPS, GPS/INS, etc.) Equipment for radar GDB generally included a combination ground radar/computer/communication system ("Q" system) and aircraft avionics for processing radioed commands.
A 21st century variant of ground-directed bombing is the radio command guidance for armed unmanned aerial vehicles to effect ground-directed release of ordnance (e.g., precision-guided munitions for bombing such as the AGM-114 Hellfire).
World War II
In early 1945, ground-directed bombing was invented by Lt Col Reginald Clizbe, deputy commander of the 47th Bombardment Group (Light), using automatic tracking radar in Northern Italy for A-26C missions (e.g., in the Po Valley). Development was by a team that included Donald H. Falkingham (who was awarded the Air Medal) that modified radar plotting to transmit control commands to the pilot direction indicator (bomb release was eventually automated from the ground radar). Similar to the ground training configuration in the US for bombardiers with the Norden bombsight, in a tent near the SCR-284 radar a bombsight was automatically positioned over a large map by the plotting signals converted from the radar track's spherical coordinates from the SCR-284 ranging and antenna pointing circuits. The guidance signals output from the moving bombsight as it viewed the map were then relayed to the aircraft as if the bombsight were on board (e.g., to a 1945 AN/ARA-17 Release Point Indicator).
Post-war, ground radar command guidance was common for missiles designed to bombard ground targets, such as the AN/MSQ-1A with alternating current analog computer initially used for guidance of the MGM-1 Matador (the Republic-Ford JB-2 Loon had used ground radar guidance in 1945, and a few V-2s bombarding England used radio control in 1944.)
Korean War GDB equipment of the United States Marine Corps included the AN/MPQ-14, and GBD in Korea "was first tried on November 28 , when a detachment of the 3903d Radar Bomb Scoring Squadron used truck-mounted AN/MPQ-2 radars [derived from the World War II SCR-584 gun laying set] to guide B–26s against enemy positions in front of the 25th Infantry Division." Three USAF RBS detachments (e.g., Det 5) commanded GDB until the 502nd Tactical Control Group "assumed control of the 3903's three MPQ-2 radar sets" in January 1951, and the radar sites "became full-scale tactical air-direction posts called Tadpoles [code]-named Hillbilly, Beverage, and Chestnut,…about ten miles behind the front lines near the command posts of the I, IX, and X Corps." On February 23, 1951, the 1st Boeing B-29 Superfortress mission controlled by an MPQ-2 was flown, and a new[who?]AN/MSQ-1 Close Support Control Set was at Yangu, Korea, by September 1951 (AN/MPS-9 with OA-132 plotting computer & board). The similar[who?]AN/MSQ-2 Close Support Control Set also developed by Rome Air Development Center (MPS-9 radar & OA-215) began arriving in 1951 (in October, one GDB detachment that hadn't been provided MSQ-2 Technical Orders mistakenly bombed itself by using MSQ-1 procedures.) Korea GDB operations of 2380 & 204 respective daylight & nighttime raids included 900 flown by USMC Vought F4U Corsairs.
Vietnam War GDB equipment included the USMC AN/TPQ-10 "Course Directing Central" and the United States Air Force "Bomb Directing Centrals" with bomb ballistics computer by Reeves Instrument Corporation (AN/MSQ-77, AN/TSQ-81, & AN/TSQ-96) for Combat Skyspot. From 1966-1971, ASRTs controlled more than 38,010 AN/TPQ-10 missions, directing more than 121,000 tons of ordnance on 56,753 targets (e.g., during the USMC "Operation Neutralize" bombing campaign against the North Vietnamese' siege of "Con Thien"). In addition to Arc Light B-52 airstrikes, GDB during the war was used against Cambodia targets of Operation Menu from Bien Hoa Air Base and by Operation Niagara, while Commando Club was used for GDB of the Red River Delta (e.g., Hanoi).
Late Cold War
Post-Vietnam War GDB Strategic Air Command missions were occasionally used for training/readiness, e.g., to maintain proficiency of aircrews and SAC's GDB-qualified technicians at 1st Combat Evaluation Group RBS sites. A new GBD system developed c. 1980 from the[who?]AN/TPB-1C Course Directing Central was the solid-state US Dynamics AN/TPQ-43 Bomb Scoring Set which included optical tracking. The AN/TPQ-43 ("Seek Score") replaced the AN/MSQ-77, -81, & -96 systems at the end of the Cold War before being decommissioned in 2007, and GDB systems were also designated for use during airdrops as part of the Ground Radar Aerial Delivery System (GRADS).
Operation Iraqi Freedom
- "AN/MSQ-77". FAS Military Analysis Network: Equipment. Federation of American Scientists. January 9, 1999. Retrieved 2012-07-17.
- GDB radar/computer systems were also used for Radar Bomb Scoring (RBS) during the Cold War until avionics with GPS accuracy were equipped to transmit a record of an unguided bomb's release point, airspeed, groundspeed, etc. for "no-drop bomb scoring" (e.g., Northrop T-38C in 2007)."Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 9, 2012. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- "Close Air Support Using Armed UAVs? - Page 2". www.military.com. Retrieved 2016-04-18.
- Akers, Marion, "Unique Radar Bombing Technique" (anecdote within book), 47th Bombardment Group (L), Turner Publishing Company, retrieved 2012-05-26,
Won his first Air Medal while working with Col. Clizby in developing a means to bomb close support to the troops using ground control radar.NOTE: "bombing by radar-control" is identified in a "19 February 1945" listing of the Combat Chronology.
- Preliminary Operation and Maintenance Handbook for Release Point Indicator AN/ARA-17. Radiation Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1945-01-01.
- http://www.radomes.org/museum/guestbook.php?guestfile=2004/guest200407.txt (see also Yahoo posting 12333)[permanent dead link]
- http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_DNZybImKTIJ:groups.yahoo.com/group/combatevaluationgroup/message/23682+%22The+first+AN/MSQ-77+came+from+Richmond%22&hl=en&gl=us&prmd=imvns&strip=1[permanent dead link]
- "3903rd Radar Bomb Scoring Group" (Web Bulletin Board). KoreanWar.org. Retrieved 2012-05-20.
On the MSQ-1, we operated in the same manner, but later learned that [for the "brand new MSQ-2 plotting equipment"] we should have entered the target coordinates into the new digital/analog computer, AND THEN 'ZEROED' THEM OUT AGAIN. The computer would remember the offset and track accordingly. Unfortunately, we did not know that without the TO's. By leaving them in, like the 584, we effectively located the target's position over the top of ourselves.
- from Direct Air Support Center wikipage
- Schlight, John (1999). The War in South Vietnam: The Years of the Offensive (1965-1968) (PDF). The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. pp. 269–271. Retrieved 2012-06-16. NOTE: Lake 2004, p. 48, mistakenly says the "normal limit (with two Skyspot beacons) was 3300 yards from friendly forces", but TACAN used multiple beacons, not Skyspot--which used only one radar even if a non-transmitting Skyspot backup receiving the A/C transponder returns tracked or later commanded the bomb run.
- Morocco, John (1985). Rain of Fire: Air War, 1969–1973. Boston: Boston Publishing Company. p. 14.
- Jost, Alan C. (2007). ConOps:The Cryptex to Operational System Mission Success (PDF) (Report). Raytheon. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
- http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:0ZWtO6N3r7MJ:dir.groups.yahoo.com/group/combatevaluationgroup/message/41816+%22Det+9%22+osan+cevg&hl=en&gl=us&prmd=imvns&strip=1[permanent dead link]
- http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFI11-231.pdf[permanent dead link]