Hall v Lorimer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Matruman (talk | contribs) at 08:16, 7 April 2017 (Still a stub, but this was a tax case). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hall v Lorimer
CourtCourt of Appeal
Citation(s)[1993] EWCA Civ 25, [1994] IRLR 171
Case opinions
Nolan LJ
Keywords
Contract of employment

Hall v Lorimer [1993] EWCA Civ 25 is a UK labour law case concerning the status of a worker as employed or self-employed. It took the view that an employment contract requires regard to be had to the extent to which the worker is in business on their own account. Because Mr Lorimer took a business-like attitude to finding new clients he was held to be running a self-employed business and not working in a successession of short-term employments.

Facts

Mr Lorimer received £32,875 for his employment and incurred expenses of £9,250. He was a television technician working for 20 separate companies on short term jobs.

Judgment

Nolan LJ held that he was self-employed and could therefore set his expenses off against his income. He said what is partly relevant to employment status is,[1]

the extent to which the individual is dependant or independent of a particular paymaster for the financial exploitation of his talents.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ [1994] IRLR 171, 174

References

External links