Jump to content

Hista fabricii

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) at 19:35, 23 February 2018 (Add from=Q2010979 to {{Taxonbar}}; WP:GenFixes on, using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hista fabricii
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Genus:
Species:
H. fabricii
Binomial name
Hista fabricii
(Swainson, 1823)[1]
Synonyms
  • Castnia fabricii Swainson, 1823
  • Castnia boisduvalii Walker, 1854
  • Castnia herrichii Herrich-Schäffer, [1854]
  • Castnia ciela Herrich-Schäffer, [1855]
  • Castnia besckei Ménétriés, 1857
  • Castnia boisduvali Schaufuss, 1870 (not Walker, 1854)
  • Castnia papagaya Westwood, 1877
  • Castnia papagaya f. grandensis Strand, 1913
  • Castnia similis Röber, 1927
  • Castnia boisduvali f. interrupta Spitz, 1930

Hista fabricii is a moth in the Castniidae family. It is found in Brazil. It mainly occurs in the southern and south-eastern parts of the country, in areas of the Atlantic Forest.

The length of the forewings is 34 mm for males and 42 mm for females. The forewings are dark brown with two or three hyaline (glassy) spots at the apex. The hindwings are reddish orange with an extradiscal spotband resembling a spiral. Adults are on wing from September to April.

There are some records of larvae foraging in Tillandsia aeranthos, but the food plant is unknown. Pupation takes place in the ground at the base of trees covered with epiphytic Bromeliaceae.

Subspecies

  • Hista fabricii fabricii (Brazil)
  • Hista fabricii boisduvalii (Walker, 1854) (Brazil)
  • Hista fabricii papagaya (Westwood, 1877) (Brazil)

Etymology

The specific epithet is a tribute to Johan Christian Fabricius (1745-1808).

References

  1. ^ Hista at Markku Savela's Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms
  • Moraes, S.S.; Duarte, M.; González, J.M. 2010: Revision of Hista Oiticica (Lepidoptera: Castniidae) and discussion on the validity of its subspecies. Zootaxa, 2421: 1–27. Preview