Hurt v The King
Hurt v The King is a decision of the High Court of Australia.[1][2]
The case concerned how sentencing courts should treat mandatory minimum sentences in Australia.[2]
An important finding in the case was that 'mandatory minimum' sentences are able to be discounted below the amounts stated in legislation. For example, a conviction under legislation with a mandatory minimum of four years still might result in a lesser sentence; if there are reasons to discount that four year amount. (e.g. a 25% discount on sentence for pleading guilty).[1]
References[edit]
- ^ a b Lawyers, George Criminal (2024-03-13). "Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Australia". George Criminal Lawyers. Retrieved 2024-03-20.
- ^ a b Balani, Rohan (2023). "Planting the Yardstick: The Approach to Mandatory Minimum Sentences and the High Court Appeals in Delzotto and Hurt" (PDF). Sydney Law Review. 45 (3).
 | This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |