Jump to content

Kruskal–Katona theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 131.111.184.8 (talk) at 14:59, 17 May 2012 (Statement for uniform hypergraphs: removed false statement). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In algebraic combinatorics, the Kruskal–Katona theorem gives a complete characterization of the f-vectors of abstract simplicial complexes. It includes as a special case the Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem and can be restated in terms of uniform hypergraphs. The theorem is named after Joseph Kruskal and Gyula O. H. Katona. It was independently proved by Marcel Schützenberger, but his contribution escaped notice for several years.

Statement

Given two positive integers N and i, there is a unique way to expand N as a sum of binomial coefficients as follows:

This expansion can be constructed by applying the greedy algorithm: set ni to be the maximal n such that replace N with the difference, i with i − 1, and repeat until the difference becomes zero. Define

Statement for simplicial complexes

An integral vector (f0, f1, … fd −1 ) is the f-vector of some (d −1 )-dimensional simplicial complex if and only if

Statement for uniform hypergraphs

Let A be a set consisting of N distinct i-element subsets of a fixed set U ("the universe") and B be the set of all (i −r )-element subsets of the sets in A. Expand N as above. Then the cardinality of B is bounded below as follows:

Ingredients of the proof

For every positive i, list all i-element subsets a1 < a2 < … ai of the set N of natural numbers in the reverse lexicographic order. For example, for i = 3, the list begins

Given a vector f = (f0, f1, …, fd −1 ) with positive integer components, let Δf be the subset of the power set 2N consisting of the empty set together with the first fi − 1 i-element subsets of N in the list for i = 1, …, d. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. Vector f is the f-vector of a simplicial complex Δ.
  2. Δf is a simplicial complex.

The difficult implication is 1 ⇒ 2.

References

  • Kruskal, J. B. (1963), "The number of simplices in a complex", in Bellman, R. (ed.), Mathematical Optimization Techniques, University of California Press.
  • Stanley, Richard (1996), Combinatorics and commutative algebra, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 41 (2nd ed.), Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., ISBN 0-8176-3836-9.