Liberalism and the Limits of Justice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Freeknowledgecreator (talk | contribs) at 04:08, 25 April 2016 (correct infobox). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
Cover of the first edition
AuthorMichael Sandel
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SubjectLiberalism
Published1982 (Cambridge University Press)
Media typePrint (hardcover and paperback)
Pages231
ISBN978-0521567411

Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (1982; second edition 1998) is a book by Michael Sandel.[1] The work helped start the liberalism-communitarianism debate that dominated Anglo-American political philosophy in the 1980s.

Summary

Sandel criticizes the social democratic liberals John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin, arguing that their views rest on anti-liberal collectivist foundations and are incompatible with the elements of liberal individualism they espouse. He offers a communitarian critique of liberalism, arguing that individuals are constituted by their communities and the obligations that follow from being part of them.[2] Partly inspired by Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), Sandel argues that Rawls bases his political philosophy on an untenable metaphysics of the self.[3] In his view, Rawls's philosophy shares the metaphysical assumptions of Kantian ethics, in which a purely noumenal self that is detached from all empirical constraints somehow retains motives that enable it to make choices.[4]

Scholarly reception

Philosopher Will Kymlicka writes that Liberalism and the Limits of Justice is Sandel's best-known book, and helped start the liberalism-communitarianism debate that dominated Anglo-American political philosophy in the 1980s.[5] Philosopher Jonathan Wolff writes that Sandel provides the fullest development of the argument, which other writers have also made, that Rawls bases his political philosophy on an untenable metaphysics of the self.[3]

See also

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ Sandel 1998. p. iv.
  2. ^ Boaz 1998, pp. 449–450.
  3. ^ a b Wolff 1991, pp. 121.
  4. ^ Scruton 1994, pp. 321, 411.
  5. ^ Kymlicka 1995, pp. 788.

Bibliography

Books
  • Boaz, David (1998). Boaz, David (ed.). The Libertarian Reader: Classic and contemporary writings from Lao-tzu to Milton Friedman. New York: The Free Press. ISBN 0-684-84767-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Kymlicka, Will (1995). Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-866132-0. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Sandel, Michael (1998). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-56741-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Scruton, Roger (1994). Sexual Desire: A Philosophical Investigation. London: Phoenix. ISBN 1-85799-100-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Wolff, Jonathan (1991). Robert Nozick: Property, Justice and the Minimal State. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1856-3. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

External links