Jump to content

Martin v. Ohio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Berek (talk | contribs) at 17:34, 18 October 2016 (References: stub tag). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Martin v. Ohio, 480 U.S. 228 (1986), is a criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the presumption of innocence requiring prosecution to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt does not extend to the defense of justification, whereby states could legislate a burden on the defense to prove justification.[1]: 18 

References

  1. ^ Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyora Binder, ISBN 978-1-4548-0698-1, [1]