Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
| Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued April 23, 1996 Decided June 26, 1996 | |
| Full case name | Medtronic, Inc., Petitioner 95-754 v. Lora Lohr, et vir; Lora Lohr, et vir, Petitioners 95-886 v. Medtronic, Inc. |
| Citations | 518 U.S. 470 (more) 116 S. Ct. 2240; 135 L. Ed. 2d 700; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4260; 64 U.S.L.W. 4625; CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. ¶ 14,634; 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1077; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4685; 96 Daily Journal DAR 7557; 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 83 |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Stevens, joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (parts I, II, III, V, VII); Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg (parts IV, VI) |
| Concurrence | Breyer |
| Concur/dissent | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas |
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996),[1] is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the scope of federal preemption.
It was later limited by Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.[2]
See also
References
External links
- Text of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |