Jump to content

Mega journal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by I dream of horses (talk | contribs) at 04:44, 7 September 2016 (→Definition: clean up using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A mega journal (also mega-journal and megajournal) is a peer-reviewed academic open access journal designed to be much larger than a traditional journal by exerting low selectivity among accepted articles. It was pioneered by PLOS ONE.[1][2] This highly lucrative publishing model[2] was soon emulated by other publishers.

Definition

A mega journal has the following defining characteristics:

Other less universal characteristics are

  • "an accelerated review and publication process",[2] "fast turnaround time";[6] and
  • "academic editors",[6] even "a large editorial board of academic editors",[5] (instead of professional editors)
  • value-added services such as reusable graphics and data through Creative Commons licenses[7]

Mega journals are also online-only, with no printed version, and are fully open access, in contrast to hybrid open access journals.[7] Some "predatory" open access publishers use the mega journal model.[1]

Influence

It has been suggested that the academic journal landscape might become dominated by a few mega journals in the future, at least in terms of total number of articles published.[8] Megajournals are also disrupting[clarification needed] the market of article processing charges.[9] Their business model may not motivate reviewers, who donate their time to "influence their field, gain exposure to the most current cutting edge research or list their service to a prestigious journal on their CVs."[10] Finally, they may no longer serve as "fora for the exchange ... among colleagues in a particular field or sub-field", as traditionally happened in scholarly journals.[11] To counter that indiscrimination, PLOS ONE, the prototypical megajournal, has started to "package relevant articles into subject-specific collections."[12]

List of mega journals

Notes

  1. ^ Self-declared:[21]
  2. ^ Self-declared:[22]
  3. ^ Self-declared:[23]
  4. ^ Self-declared:[24]
  5. ^ Self-declared:[25]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Beall, Jeffrey (2013). "Five Predatory Mega-Journals: A Review" (PDF). The Charleston Advisor. 14 (4): 20–25. doi:10.5260/chara.14.4.20.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges (PDF) (Report). Wellcome Trust. March 2014. pp. 69 pages. {{cite report}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Wiley".
  4. ^ a b c d e f Claire Creaser (5 May 2014). "The rise of the mega-journal". School of Business and Economics Research Blog. Loughborough University.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Peter Binfield (19 January 2014). Sönke Bartling & Sascha Friesike (ed.). "Novel Scholarly Journal Concepts". Opening Science. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_10.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Frank Norman (9 July 2012). "Megajournals". Trading Knowledge. Frank Norman.
  7. ^ a b Björk, Bo-Christer. "Have the "mega-journals" reached the limits to growth?". PeerJ. 3. doi:10.7717/peerj.981. PMC 4451030. PMID 26038735.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  8. ^ Hayahiko Ozono, Okayama University, Participants' Report on The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011. “Burgeoning Open Access MegaJournals”. National Institute of Informatics. [1]
  9. ^ Solomon, David J. (2014). "A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals". PeerJ. 2: e365. doi:10.7717/peerj.365.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  10. ^ Wellen, R. (2013). "Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling". SAGE Open. 3 (4). doi:10.1177/2158244013507271.
  11. ^ Beall, Jeffrey (2013). "The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access". tripleC. 11 (2): 589–597.
  12. ^ MacCallum, C. J. (2011). "Why ONE is More Than 5". PLoS Biology. 9 (12): e1001235. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001235.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  13. ^ a b Francisco Osorio (5 April 2013). "Open Library of Humanities: mega journals seeing from the south". Facultad de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Chile.
  14. ^ a b "Beyond open access for academic publishers", 15 May 2014, Publishing Technology PLC [2]
  15. ^ a b c d e f Dagmar Sitek & Roland Bertelmann, "Open Access: A State of the Art", 2 March 2014, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_9 [3]
  16. ^ James MacGregor, Kevin Stranack & John Willinsky, "The Public Knowledge Project: Open Source Tools for Open Access to Scholarly Communication", 2 March 2014, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_11 [4]
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Rhodri Jackson and Martin Richardson, "Gold open access: the future of the academic journal?", Chapter 9 in Cope and Phillip (2014), p.223-248.
  18. ^ Michael Bernstein and Katie Cottingham, Ph.D. (14 December 2015). "American Chemical Society announces ACS Omega, a new open access journal serving global and multidisciplinary chemistry". www.acs.org. ACS.
  19. ^ a b c Peter Binfield, "PLoS ONE and the Rise of the Open Access MegaJournal", The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011, National Institute of Informatics, The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011 February 29, 2012 [5] [6]
  20. ^ Jeffrey Beall (3 March 2013). "New Term: MOAMJ = Multidisciplinary Open Access Mega Journal". Scholarly Open Access.
  21. ^ New IEEE Open-Access “Mega Journal” Aims to Boost Technology Innovation [7]
  22. ^ Zhang, Zhi-Qiang (2006). "The making of a mega-journal in taxonomy" (PDF). Zootaxa (1385): 67–68.
  23. ^ "Press Release". Open Library of Humanities.
  24. ^ "De Gruyter Open converts eight subscription journals to Open Access megajournals". De Gruyter Open.
  25. ^ "Introducing Heliyon - Elsevier's new broad scope, open access journal". Elsevier Heliyon.

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mega_journal&oldid=738143699"