Jump to content

Munn v. Illinois

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot NG (talk | contribs) at 18:55, 1 February 2016 (Reverting possible vandalism by Bobbydlaskf to version by Dcirovic. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (2528153) (Bot)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Munn v. Illinois
Argued January 14–18, 1876
Decided March 1, 1877
Full case nameMunn v. State of Illinois
Citations94 U.S. 113 (more)
24 L. Ed. 77; 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1842; 4 Otto 113
Holding
The Fourteenth Amendment does not prevent the State of Illinois from regulating charges for use of a business' grain elevators.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Morrison Waite
Associate Justices
Nathan Clifford · Noah H. Swayne
Samuel F. Miller · David Davis
Stephen J. Field · William Strong
Joseph P. Bradley · Ward Hunt
Case opinions
MajorityWaite, joined by Clifford, Swayne, Miller, Davis, Bradley, Hunt
DissentField, joined by Strong
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1877),[1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the power of government to regulate private industries.

The case developed as a result of the Illinois legislature’s responding in 1871 to pressure from the National Grange, an association of farmers, by setting maximum rates that private companies could charge for the storage and transport of agricultural products. The Chicago grain warehouse firm of Munn and Scott was subsequently found guilty of violating the law but appealed the conviction on the grounds that the Illinois regulation represented an unconstitutional deprivation of property without due process of law.[2]The Supreme Court decided the appeal in 1877. Chief Justice Morrison Remick Waite spoke for the majority when he said that state power to regulate extends to private industries that affect the public interest. Because grain storage facilities were devoted to public use, their rates were subject to public regulation. Moreover, Waite declared that even though Congress alone is granted control over interstate commerce, a state could take action in the public interest without impairing that federal control.

References

  1. ^ Text of Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1876) is available from: Findlaw Justia
  2. ^ "Munn v. Illinois". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 16 June 2014.

Further reading

  • Kitch, Edmund W.; Bowler, Clara Ann (1978). "The Facts of Munn v. Illinois". Supreme Court Review. 1978: 313–343. JSTOR 3109535.