|Range of A. gentilis Breeding range Year-round range Wintering range|
The northern goshawk (//; Accipiter gentilis) is a medium-large raptor in the family Accipitridae, which also includes other extant diurnal raptors, such as eagles, buzzards and harriers. As a species in the genus Accipiter, the goshawk is often considered a "true hawk". The scientific name is Latin; Accipiter is "hawk", from accipere, "to grasp", and gentilis is "noble" or "gentle" because in the Middle Ages only the nobility were permitted to fly goshawks for falconry.
It is a widespread species that inhabits many of the temperate parts of the Northern Hemisphere. The northern goshawk is the only species in the genus Accipiter found in both Eurasia and North America. It may have the widest distribution of any true member of the family Accipitridae, behind arguably only the hen harrier (Circus cyaenus) (which is often considered two species between North America and Eurasia) and occurring over a slightly wider range than either golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) or rough-legged buzzards (Buteo lagopus). Except in a small portion of southern Asia, it is the only species of "goshawk" in its range and it is thus often referred to, both officially and unofficially, as simply the "goshawk". It is mainly resident, but birds from colder regions migrate south for the winter. In North America, migratory goshawks are often seen migrating south along mountain ridge tops at nearly any time of the fall depending on latitude.
- 1 Distribution
- 2 Habitat
- 3 Description
- 4 Behavior
- 5 Dietary biology
- 6 Breeding
- 7 Lifespan
- 8 Status
- 9 Relationship with humans
- 10 References
- 11 External links
The northern goshawk has a large circumpolar distribution. In Eurasia, it is found in most areas of Europe excluding Ireland and Iceland. It also has a fairly spotty distribution in western Europe (i.e. Great Britain, Spain, France) but is more or less found continuously through the rest of the continent. Their Eurasian distribution sweeps continuously across most of Russia, excluding the fully treeless tundra in the northern stretches, to the western limits of Siberia as far as Anadyr and Kamchatka. In the Eastern Hemisphere, they are found in their southern limits in extreme northwestern Morocco, Corsica and Sardinia, the "toe" of Italy, southern Greece, Turkey, the Caucasus, Sinkiang's Tien Shan, in some parts of Tibet and the Himalayas, western China and Japan. In winter, northern goshawks may be found rarely as far south as to Taif in Saudi Arabia and perhaps Tonkin, Vietnam.
In North America, they are most broadly found in the western United States, including Alaska, and provinces in western Canada. Their breeding range in the western contiguous United States largely consists of the wooded foothills of the Rocky Mountains and many other large mountain ranges from Washington to southern California extending east to central Colorado and westernmost Texas. Somewhat discontinuous breeding populations are found in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico, thence also somewhat spottily into western Mexico down through Sonora and Chihuahua along the Sierra Madre Occidental as far as Jalisco and Guerrero, their worldwide southern limit as a breeding species.
The goshawk continues eastbound through much of Canada as a native species, but is rarer in most of the eastern United States, especially the Midwest where they are not typically found outside of the Great Lakes region (a very small population persists in the extreme northeastern corner of North Dakota), where a good-sized breeding population occurs in the northern parts of Minnesota, Illinois, Michigan and somewhat into Ohio. They breed also in mountainous areas of New England, New York, central Pennsylvania and northwestern New Jersey, sporadically down to extreme northwestern Maryland and northeastern West Virginia. Vagrants have been reported in Ireland, central Morocco, northern Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, southern Iran, Pakistan, western India (Gujarat) and on Izu-shoto (south of Japan) and the Commander Islands, not to mention most of the United States where they do not breed.
Northern goshawks can be found in both deciduous and coniferous forests. While the species might show strong regional preferences for certain trees, they seem to have no strong overall preferences nor even a preference between deciduous or coniferous trees despite claims to the contrary. More important than the type of trees are the composition of a given tree stand, which should be tall, old-growth with intermediate to heavy canopy coverage (often more than 40%) and minimal density undergrowth, both of which are favorable for hunting conditions. Also, goshawks typically require close proximity to openings in which to execute additional hunting. More so than in North America, the goshawks of Eurasia, especially central Europe, may live in fairly urbanized patchworks of small woods, shelter-belts and copses and even use largely isolated trees in central parts of Eurasian cities. Access to waterways and riparian zones of any kind is not uncommon in goshawk home ranges but seems to not be a requirement. Narrow tree-lined riparian zones in otherwise relatively open habitats can provide suitable wintering habitat in the absence of more extensive woodlands. The northern goshawk can be found at almost any altitude, but recently is typically found at high elevations due to a paucity of extensive forests remaining in lowlands across much of its range. Altitudinally, goshawks may live anywhere up to a given mountain range’s tree line, which is usually 3,000 m (9,800 ft) in elevation or less. The northern limit of their distribution also coincides with the tree line and here may adapt to dwarf tree communities, often along drainages of the lower tundra. In winter months, the northernmost or high mountain populations move down to warmer forests with lower elevations, often continuing to avoid detection except while migrating. A majority of goshawks around the world remain sedentary throughout the year.
The northern goshawk has relatively short, broad wings and a long tail, typical for Accipiter species and common to raptors that require maneuverability within forest habitats. For an Accipiter, it has a relatively sizeable bill, relatively long wings, a relatively short tail, robust and fairly short legs and particularly thick toes. Across most of the species' range, it is blue-grey above or brownish-grey with dark barring or streaking over a grey or white base color below, but Asian subspecies in particular range from nearly white overall to nearly black above. Goshawks tend to show clinal variation in color, with most goshawks further north being paler and those in warmer areas being darker but individuals can be either dark in the north or pale in the south. Individuals that live a long life may gradually become paler as they age, manifesting in mottling and a lightening of the back from a darker shade to a bluer pale color. It plumage is more variable than that of the Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), which is probably due to higher genetic variability in the larger goshawk. The juvenile northern goshawk is usually a solid to mildly streaky brown above, with many variations in underside color from nearly pure white to almost entirely overlaid with broad dark cinnamon-brown striping. Both juveniles and adults have a barred tail, with 3 to 5 dark brown or black bars. Adults always have a white eye stripe or supercilia, which tends to be broader in northern Eurasian and North American birds. In North America, juveniles have pale-yellow eyes, and adults develop dark red eyes usually after their second year, although nutrition and genetics may affect eye color as well. In Europe and Asia, juveniles also have pale-yellow eyes while adults typically develop orange-colored eyes. Moulting starts between late March and late May, the male tends to moult later and faster than the female. Moulting results in the female being especially likely to have a gap in its wing feathers while incubating and this may cause some risk, especially if the male is lost, as it inhibits her hunting abilities and may hamper her defensive capabilities, putting both herself and the nestlings in potential danger of predation. The moult takes a total of 4–6 months, with tail feathers following the wings then lastly the contour and body feathers, which may not be completely moulted even as late as October.
Although existing wing size and body mass measurements indicate that the Henst's goshawk (Accipiter henstii) and Meyer's goshawk (Accipiter meyerianus) broadly overlap in size with this species, the northern goshawk is on average the largest member of the genus Accipiter, especially outsizing its tropic cousins in the larger Eurasian races. The northern goshawk, like all Accipiters, exhibits sexual dimorphism, where females are significantly larger than males, with the dimorphism notably greater in most parts of Eurasia. Linearly, males average about 8% smaller in North America and 13% smaller than females in Eurasia, but in the latter landmass can range up to a very noticeable 28% difference in extreme cases. Male northern goshawks are 46 to 61 cm (18 to 24 in) long and have a 89 to 105 cm (35 to 41 in) wingspan. The female is much larger, 58 to 69 cm (23 to 27 in) long with a 108 to 127 cm (43 to 50 in) wingspan. In a study of North American goshawks (A. g. atricapillus), males were found to average 56 cm (22 in) in total length, against females which averaged 61 cm (24 in). Males from six subspecies average around 762 g (1.680 lb) in body mass, with a range from all races of 357 to 1,200 g (0.787 to 2.646 lb). The female can be up to more than twice as heavy, averaging from the same races 1,150 g (2.54 lb) with an overall range of 758 to 2,200 g (1.671 to 4.850 lb). Among standard measurements, the most oft-measured is wing chord which can range from 286 to 354 mm (11.3 to 13.9 in) in males and from 324 to 390 mm (12.8 to 15.4 in) in females. Additional, the tail is 200–295 mm (7.9–11.6 in), the culmen is 20–26.3 mm (0.79–1.04 in) and the tarsus is 68–90 mm (2.7–3.5 in).
Northern goshawks normally only vocalize during courtship or the nesting season. Adult goshawks may chatter a repeated note, varying in speed and volume based on the context. When calling from a perch, birds often turn their heads slowly from side to side, producing a ventriloquial effect. The male calls a fast, high-pitched kew-kew-kew when delivering food or else a very different croaking guck or chup. The latter sound has been considered by some authors similar to that of a person snapping the tongue away from the roof the mouth; the males produce it by holding the beak wide open, thrusting the head up and forward, than bringing it down as the sound is emitted, repeated at intervals of five seconds. This call is uttered when the male encounters a female. Two calls have been recorded mainly from brooding females in the race A. g. atricapillus: a recognition scream of short, intense notes (whee-o or hee-ya) which ends in harsh, falsetto tone; then a dismissal call given when the male lingers after delivering food, consisting of a choked, cut-off scream. Meanwhile, the adult female's rapid strident kek-kek-kek expresses alarm or intent to mob towards threatening intruders. This is often done when mobbing a predator such as a great horned owl (Bubo virginianus) and as it progresses the female's voice may lower slightly in pitch and becomes harsh and rasping. As the intensity of her attacks increases, her kakking becomes more rapid and can attain a constant screaming quality. Females often withdraw into the treetops when fatigued, and their calls are then spaced at longer intervals. Males respond to interlopers or predators with a quieter, slower gek gek gek or ep ep ep. A call consisting of kek…kek.kekk kek kek-kek-kek is used mainly by females in advertisement and during pre-laying mutual calling. Both sexes also may engage in kakking during copulation. Vocalizations mainly peak in late courtship/early nesting around late March to April, can begin up to 45 minutes before sunrise, and are more than twice in as frequent in the first three hours of daylight as in the rest of the day. Occasionally hunting northern goshawks may make shrill screams when pursuing prey, especially if a lengthy chase is undertaken and the prey is already aware of its intended predator.
The genus Accipiter contains nearly 50 known living species and is the most diverse genus of diurnal raptors in the world. This group of agile, smallish, forest-dwelling hawks has been in existence for possibly tens of millions of years, probably as an adaptation to the explosive numbers of small birds that began to occupy the world’s forest in the last few eras. The harriers are the only group of extant diurnal raptors that seem to bear remotely close relation to this genus, whereas buteonines, Old World kites, sea eagles and chanting-goshawks are much more distantly related and all other modern accipitrids are not directly related.
Within the genus Accipiter, the northern goshawk seems to belong to a superspecies with other larger goshawks from different portions of the world. Meyer's goshawk, found in the South Pacific, has been posited as the most likely to be most close related living cousin to the northern goshawk, the somewhat puzzling gap in their respective ranges explained by other Palearctic raptors such as Bonelli's eagles (Aquila fasciata) and short-toed eagles (Circaetus gallicus) that have extant isolated tropical island populations and were probably part of the same southwest Pacific radiation that led to the Meyer's goshawk. A presumably older radiation of this group occurred in Africa, where it led to both the Henst's goshawk of Madagascar and the black sparrowhawk (Accipiter melanoleucus) of the mainland. While the Henst's goshawk quite resembles the northern goshawks, the black sparrowhawk is superficially described as a “sparrowhawk” due to its relatively much longer and finer legs than those of typical goshawks but overall its size and plumage (especially that of juveniles) is much more goshawk than sparrowhawk-like.
Outside of the presumed superspecies, the genus Erythrotriorchis may be part of an Australasian radiation of basal goshawks based largely on their similar morphology to northern goshawks. Genetic studies have indicated that the Cooper's hawk of North America is also fairly closely related to the northern goshawk, having been present in North America before either of the other two North American Accipiters. However, the much smaller sharp-shinned hawk, which has similar plumage to the Cooper's hawk and seems to be most closely related to the Eurasian sparrowhawk, appears to have occupied North America the latest of the three North American species, despite having the broadest current distribution of any Accipiter in the Americas (extending down through much of South America).
The term goshawk comes from the Old English gōsheafoc, "goose-hawk".
The northern goshawk appears to have diversified in northern, central Eurasia and spread both westwards to occupy Europe and, later on, eastwards to spread into North America across the Bering Land Bridge. Fossil remains show that goshawks were present in California by the Pleistocene era. Two non-exclusive processes could have occurred to cause the notably color and size variation of northern goshawks throughout its range: isolation in the past enabled gene combinations to assort as distinct morphs that suited conditions in different geographical areas, followed by a remixing of these genotypes to result in clines, or subtle variation in modern selection pressures led to a diversity of hues and patterns. As a result of the high variation of individual goshawks in plumage characteristics and typical trends in clinal variation and size variations that largely follow Bergmann's rule and Gloger's rule, an excessive number of subspecies have been described for the northern goshawk in the past. In Europe (including European Russia) alone, 12 subspecies were described between 1758 and 1990. Most modern authorities agree on listing nine to ten subspecies of northern goshawks from throughout its range.
- A. g. gentilis (Linnaeus, 1758) – The nominate race is distributed through most of the species current European range, excluding northern Fennoscandia, northwestern Russia and possibly some of the Mediterranean islands they inhabit. Outside of Europe, this subspecies' range extends south to northwestern Africa (almost entirely Morocco) and east in Eurasia to Urals, the Caucasus and Asia Minor. It is a typically large subspecies with high levels of sexual dimorphism. The wing chord of males ranges from 300 to 342 mm (11.8 to 13.5 in) and of females from 336 to 385 mm (13.2 to 15.2 in). Body mass is variable, range from 517 to 1,110 g (1.140 to 2.447 lb) in males and from 820 to 2,200 g (1.81 to 4.85 lb) in females. In some cases, the largest adult females (including some exceptionally big females which are the heaviest goshawks known from anywhere) from within a population are up to four times heavier than the smallest adult males, although this is exceptional. The highest average weights come from central Fennoscandia, where the sexes weigh on average 865 g (1.907 lb) and 1,414 g (3.117 lb), respectively. The lowest come from Spain, where goshawks of this race weigh a median of 690 g (1.52 lb) in males and 1,050 g (2.31 lb) in females. The nominate race is generally a dark slaty-brown color on its back and wing coverts with a blackish-brown head. The supercilium is thin and the underside is generally creamy with heavy dark barring. On average, in addition to their smaller size, nominate goshawks to the south of the race’s distribution have thinner supericilia and broader and denser barring on the underside. An aberrant “isabelline” morph is known mainly from central and eastern Europe, where the goshawk may be a general beige color (somewhat similar to the pale birds from the races albidus and buteoides), but such birds appear to be very rare.
- A. g. arrigonii (Kleinschmidt, 1903) – This is an island race found on the Mediterranean isles of Sardinia and Corsica. It averages smaller and weaker-footed than goshawks from the nominate race. The wing chord measures 293 to 308 mm (11.5 to 12.1 in) in males and 335 to 347 mm (13.2 to 13.7 in) in females. This race is typically a more blackish brown above with almost fully black head, while the underside is almost pure white and more heavily overlaid with black barring and conspicuous black shaft-streaks. This subspecies is not listed by all authorities but is often considered valid.
- A. g. buteoides (Menzbier, 1882) – This race is characteristic of the northern stretches of the western Eurasian range of goshawks, being found as a breeding species from northern Fennoscandia to western Siberia, ranging as far as the Lena River. In the eastern portion of its distribution, many birds may travel south to central Eurasia to winter. This is a large race, averaging larger than most populations of the nominate race but being about the same size as the big nominate goshawks with which they may overlap and interbreed with in Fennoscandia. The wing chord in males ranges from 308 to 345 mm (12.1 to 13.6 in) while that of females ranges from 340 to 388 mm (13.4 to 15.3 in). The body mass of males has been reported from 870 to 1,170 g (1.92 to 2.58 lb), with an average of 1,016 g (2.240 lb), while that of females is reportedly 1,190 to 1,850 g (2.62 to 4.08 lb), with an average of 1,355 g (2.987 lb). Usually, this race is an altogether paler colour than the nominate, being blue-grey above with a dusky-grey crown and a broad supercilium. The underside is white with rather fine blackish-brown barring. Pale flecking on the feather shafts sometimes result in barred appearance on the contour feathers of the nape, back and upper wing. Many birds from this subspecies also a tan to pale brown eye color. These two characteristics are sometimes considered typical of this race but individuals are rather variable. In western Siberia, about 10% of birds of this race are nearly pure white (similar to albidus) with varied indications of darker streaking.
- A. g. albidus (Menzbier, 1882) – This race of goshawk is found in northeastern Siberia and Kamchatka. Many birds of this race travel south for the winter to Transbaikalia, northern Mongolia and Ussuriland. This race continues the trend for goshawks to grow mildly larger eastbound in Eurasia and may be the largest known race based on the midpoint of known measurements of this race, although limited sample sizes of measured goshawks shows they broadly overlap in size with A. g. buteoides and large-bodied populations of A. g. gentilis. The wing chord can range from 316 to 346 mm (12.4 to 13.6 in) in males and from 370 to 388 mm (14.6 to 15.3 in) in females. Known males have scaled from 894 to 1,200 g (1.971 to 2.646 lb) while a small sample of females weighed have had a body mass between 1,300 and 1,750 g (2.87 and 3.86 lb). This is easily the palest race of northern goshawk. Many birds are pale grey above with much white about the head and very sparse barring below. However, about half of the goshawks of this race are more or less pure white, with only a few remnants of pale caramel flecking about the back or faint brownish markings elsewhere.
- A. g. schvedowi (Menzbier, 1882) – This race ranges from the Urals east to the Amurland, Ussuriland, Manchuria, west-central China and sporadically as a breeder into Sakhalin and the Kuril islands. A. g. schvedowi averages smaller than other races on the mainland of Eurasia, with seemingly the highest sexual dimorphism of any goshawk race, possibly as an adaptation to prey partitioning in the exceptionally sparse wooded fringes of the desert-like steppe habitat that characterizes this race’s range. The wing chord has been found to measure 298 to 323 mm (11.7 to 12.7 in) in males and 330 to 362 mm (13.0 to 14.3 in) in females. Body mass of 15 males was found to be merely 357 to 600 g (0.787 to 1.323 lb) with a mean of 501 g (1.105 lb), the lowest adult weights known for this species, while two adult females scaled 1,000 and 1,170 g (2.20 and 2.58 lb), respectively, or more than twice as much on average. Beyond its smaller size, its wings are reportedly relatively shorter and feet relatively smaller and weaker than other Eurasian races. In color, this race is typically a slate-grey above with a blackish head and is densely marked below with thin brown barring.
- A. g. fuyijamae (Swann & Hartert, 1923) – Found through the species range in Japan, from the islands of Hokkaido south to the large island of Honshu, in the latter down to as far south as forests a bit north of Hiroshima. A fairly small subspecies, it may average slightly smaller than A. g. schvedowi linearly but it is less sexually dimorphic in size and weighs slightly more on average. The wing chord is the smallest known from any race, 286 to 300 mm (11.3 to 11.8 in) in males and 302 to 350 mm (11.9 to 13.8 in) in females. However, the weights of 22 males ranged from 602 to 848 g (1.327 to 1.870 lb), averaging 715 g (1.576 lb) while 22 females ranged from 929 to 1,265 g (2.048 to 2.789 lb), averaging 1,098 g (2.421 lb). The coloration of this race is not dissimilar from A. g. schvedowi but is still darker slate above and they tend to have heavier barring below, probably being the darkest race on average, rivaled only by the similar insular race from the opposite side of the Pacific, A. g. laingi.
- A. g. atricapillus (Wilson, 1812) – Sometimes simply referred to as the American goshawk. This subspecies occupies a majority of the goshawk’s range in North America excluding some islands of the Pacific northwest and the southern part of the American southwest. American goshawks are generally slightly smaller on average than most Eurasian ones although there are regional differences in size that confirm mildly to Bergmann's rule within this race. Furthermore, sexual dimorphism in size is notably less pronounced in American goshawks than in most Eurasian races. Overall, the wing chord is 308 to 337 mm (12.1 to 13.3 in) in males and 324 to 359 mm (12.8 to 14.1 in) in females. Size within atricapillus based on body mass seems to be highest in interior Alaska, followed by the Great Lakes, is intermediate in the northwest United States from eastern Washington to the Dakotas as well as in southeast Alaska thence decreasing mildly along the Pacific in Oregon and California and smallest of all within the race in the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau states (i.e. Nevada, Utah and northern and central Arizona). Conspicuously, wing size did not correspond to variations in body mass and more southerly goshawks were frequently longer winged than the more massive northerly ones. Male atricapillus goshawk have been found weighing from 655 to 1,200 g (1.444 to 2.646 lb) and females from 758 to 1,562 g (1.671 to 3.444 lb). The lightest reported mean weights were from goshawks in northern and central Arizona, weighing a mean of 680 g (1.50 lb) in males and 935 g (2.061 lb) while the highest were from a small sample of Alaskan goshawks which weighed some 905 g (1.995 lb) in males and 1,190 g (2.62 lb) in females. Almost identical mean weights for goshawks as in Alaska were recorded for goshawks from Alberta as well. This race is typically a blue-gray color above with a boldly contrasting black head and broad white supercilia. American goshawks are often grayish below with fine gray waving barring and, compared to most Eurasian goshawks, rather apparent black shaft streaks which in combination create a vermiculated effect that is all-together messier looking than in most Eurasian birds. From a distance, atricapillus can easily appear solidly all-gray from the front. Due to this, the adult goshawk in America is sometimes called the “gray ghost”, a name also somewhat more commonly used for adult male hen harriers. Birds from mainland Alaska tend to be paler overall with more pale flecking than other American goshawks.
- A. g. laingi (Tavernier, 1940) – This insular race is found on the Queen Charlotte Islands and Vancouver Island. This subspecies is slightly smaller than the goshawks found on the mainland and is linearly the smallest race on average in North America. The wing chord of males can range from 312 to 325 mm (12.3 to 12.8 in) and that of females is 332 to 360 mm (13.1 to 14.2 in) and is on average nearly 5% smaller than those sampled goshawks from the nearby mainland. These goshawks are characteristically darker than mainland goshawks with the black of the crown extending to the interscapulars. The underside is a sootier gray overall.
- A. g. apache (van Rossem, 1938) – The range of this subspecies extends from southern Arizona and New Mexico down throughout the species range in Mexico. This subspecies has the longest median wing size of any race, running contrary to Bergmann's rule that northern birds should outsize southern ones in widely distributed temperate species. In males the wing chord ranges from 344 to 354 mm (13.5 to 13.9 in) while in females it ranges from 365 to 390 mm (14.4 to 15.4 in). However, in terms of body mass, it is only slightly heavier than the goshawks found discontinuously somewhat to the north in the Great Basin and the Colorado Plateau and lighter than the heaviest known American goshawks from Alaska and Wisconsin despite exceeding the goshawks from these areas in wing size. The weight of 49 males ranged from 631 to 744 g (1.391 to 1.640 lb), averaging 704 g (1.552 lb), while that of 88 females from two studies ranged from 845 to 1,265 g (1.863 to 2.789 lb), averaging 1,006 g (2.218 lb). Aside from its overall larger size, apache reportedly averages larger in foot size than most other American goshawks. Birds of this race tend to be darker than other American goshawks aside from the laingi type birds. Due to its shortage of distinct features beyond proportions, this is considered one of the more weakly separated among current separate subspecies, with some authors considering it merely a clinal variation of atricapillus. Even the greater wing size in southern birds follows a trend for the wing chord to increase in size in the south on the contrary to body mass.
The juvenile plumage of the species may cause some confusion, especially with other Accipiter juveniles. Unlike other northern Accipiters, the adult northern goshawk never has a rusty color to its underside barring. In Eurasia, the smaller male goshawk is sometimes confused with a female sparrowhawk, but is still notably larger, much bulkier and has relatively longer wings, which are more pointed and less boxy. Sparrowhawks tend to fly in a frequently flapping, fluttering type flight. Wing beats of northern goshawks are deeper, more deliberate, and on average slower than those of the Eurasian sparrowhawk or the two other North American Accipiters. The classic Accipiter flight is a characteristic "flap flap, glide", but the goshawk, with its greater wing area, can sometimes be seen steadily soaring in migration (smaller Accipiters almost always need to flap to stay aloft). In North America juveniles are sometimes confused with the smaller Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii), especially between small male goshawks and large female Cooper's hawks. However, the juvenile goshawk displays a heavier, vertical streaking pattern on chest and abdomen, with the juvenile Cooper's hawk streaking frequently (but not always) in a “teardrop” pattern wherein the streaking appears to taper at the top, as opposed to the more even streaking of the goshawk. The goshawk sometimes seems to have a shorter tail relative to its much broader body. Although there appears to be a size overlap between small male goshawks and large female Cooper's hawks, morphometric measurements (wing and tail length) of both species demonstrate no such overlap, although weight overlap can rarely occur due to variation in seasonal condition and food intake at time of weighing. Rarely, in the southern stretches of its Asian wintering range, the northern goshawk may live alongside the crested goshawk (Accipiter trivirgatus) which is smaller (roughly Cooper's hawk-sized) and has a slight crest as well as a distinct mixture of denser streaks and bars below and no supercilia.
Northern goshawks are sometimes mistaken for species even outside of the genus Accipiter especially as juveniles of each respective species. In North America, four species of buteonine hawk (all four of which are smaller than goshawks to a certain degree) may be confused with them on occasion despite the differing proportions of these hawks, which all have longer wings and shorter tails relative to their size. A species so similar it is sometimes nicknamed the “Mexican goshawk”, gray hawk (Buteo plagiatus) juveniles (overlapping with true goshawks in the southwest United States into Mexico) have contrasting face pattern with bold dusky eye-stripes, dark eyes, barred thighs and a bold white “U” on the uppertail coverts. The roadside hawk (Rupornis magnirostris) (rarely in same range in Mexico) is noticeably smaller with paddle-shaped wings, barred lower breast and a buff “U” on undertail coverts in young birds. Somewhat less likely to confused despite their broader extent of overlap are the red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus) which have a narrow white-barred, dark-looking tail, bold white crescents on their primaries and dark wing edges and the broad-winged hawk (Buteo playpterus) which also has dark wing edges and a differing tapered wing shape. Even wintering gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus) juveniles have been mistaken for goshawks and vice versa on occasion, especially when observed distantly perched, but have many tell-tale falcon characteristics like pointed, longer wings, a brown malar stripe as well as its more extensive barring both above and below.
The northern goshawk is always found solitarily or in pairs. This species is highly territorial as are most raptorial birds, maintaining regularly spaced home ranges that constitute their territory. Territories are maintained by adults via display flights. During nesting, the home ranges of goshawk pairs are from 600 to 4,040 ha (1,500 to 10,000 acres) and these vicinities tend to be vigorously defended both to maintain rights to their nests and mates as well as the ranges’ prey base. During display flight goshawks may engage in single or mutual high-circling. Each sex tends to defend the territory from others of their own sex. Territorial flights may occur almost through the year, but peak from January to April. Such flights may include slow-flapping with exaggerated high deep beats interspersed with long glides and undulations. In general, territorial fights are resolved without physical contact, often with one (usually a younger bird seeking a territory) retreats while the other approaches in a harrier-like warning flight, flashing its white underside at the intruder. If the incoming goshawk does not leave the vicinity, the defending goshawk may increase the exaggerated quality of its flight including a mildly undulating wave-formed rowing flight and the rowing flight with its neck held in a heron-like S to elevate the head and maximally expose the pale breast as a territorial threat display. Territorial skirmishes may on occasion escalate to physical fights in which mortalities may occur. In actual fights, goshawks fall grappling to the ground as they attempt to strike each other with talons.
Although at times considered rather sedentary for a northern raptor species, the northern goshawk is a partial migrant. Migratory movements generally occur between September and November (occasionally extending throughout December) in the fall and February to April in the spring. Spring migration is less extensive and more poorly known than fall migration, but seems to peak late March to early April. Some birds up to as far north as northern Canada and central Scandinavia may remain on territory throughout the winter. Northern goshawks from northern Fennoscandia have been recorded traveling up to 1,640 km (1,020 mi) away from first banding but adults seldom are recorded more than 300 km (190 mi) from their summer range. In Sweden, young birds distributed an average of 377 km (234 mi) in the north to an average of 70 km (43 mi) in the south. In northern Sweden, young generally disperse somewhat south, whereas in south and central Sweden, they typically distributed to the south (but not usually across the 5-km Kattegat straits). On the other hand, 4.3% of the southern Swedish goshawks actually moved north. Migrating goshawks seem to avoid crossing water, but sparrowhawks seems to be able to do so more regularly. In central Europe, few birds travel more than 30 km (19 mi) throughout the year, a few juveniles have exceptionally been recorded traveling up to 300 km (190 mi). In Eurasia, very small numbers of migratory northern goshawks cross the Strait of Gibraltar and Bosporus in autumn but further east more significant winter range expansions may extend from northern Iran & southern Turkmenia to Aral & Balkhash lakes, from Kashmir to Assam, extreme northwestern Thailand, northern Vietnam, southern China, Taiwan, Ryukyu Islands and South Korea. Migratory goshawks in North America may move down to Baja California, Sinaloa and into most of west Texas, but generally in non-irruptive years, goshawks winter no further south than Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, eastern Tennessee and western North Carolina. Some periodic eruptions to nearly as far as the Gulf of Mexico have been recorded at no fewer than 10 years apart. In one case, a female that was banded in Wisconsin was recovered 1,860 km (1,160 mi) in Louisiana, a first ever record of the species in that state.
Prey availability may primarily dictate the proportion of goshawk populations that migrate and the selection of wintering areas, followed by the presence of snow which may aid prey capture in the short-term but in the long-term is likely to cause higher goshawk mortality. Showing the high variability of migratory movements, in one study of winter movements of adult female goshawks that bred in high-elevation forests of Utah, about 36% migrated 100 to 613 km (62 to 381 mi) to the general south, 22% migrated farther than that distance, 8.3% migrated less far, 2.7% went north instead of south and 31% stayed throughout winter on their breeding territory. Irruptive movements seem to occur for northern populations, i.e. those of the boreal forests in North America, Scandinavia, and possibly Siberia, with more equal sex ratio of movement and a strong southward tendency of movements in years where prey such as hares and grouse crash. Male young goshawks tend to disperse farther than females, which is unusual in birds, including raptors. It has been speculated that larger female juveniles displace male juveniles, forcing them to disperse farther, to the incidental benefit of the species’ genetic diversity. In Cedar Grove, Wisconsin, there were more than twice as many juvenile males than females recorded migrating. At the hawk watch at Cape May Point State Park in New Jersey, few adult males and no adult females have been recorded in fall migration apart from irruptive years, indicating that migration is more important to juveniles. More juveniles were recorded migrating than adults in several years of study from Sweden. In northern Accipiters including the goshawk, there seems to be multiple peaks in numbers of migrants, an observation that suggests partial segregation by age and sex.
As typical of the genus Accipiter (as well as unrelated forest-dwelling raptors of various lineages), the northern goshawk has relatively short wings and a long tail which make it ideally adapted to engaging in brief but agile and twisting hunting flights through dense vegetation of wooded environments. This species is a powerful hunter, taking birds and mammals in a variety of woodland habitats, often utilizing a combination of speed and obstructing cover to ambush their victims. Goshawks often forage in adjoining habitat types, such as the edge of a forest and meadow. Hunting habitat can be variable, as in a comparison of habitats used in England found that only 8% of landscapes used were woodlands whereas in Sweden 73-76% of the habitat used was woodland, albeit normally within 200 m (660 ft) of an opening. In North America, goshawks are generally rather more likely than those from Eurasia to hunt within the confines of mature forest, excluding areas where prey numbers are larger outside of the forest, such as where scrub-dwelling cottontails are profuse. One study from central Sweden found that locally goshawks typically hunt within the largest patches of mature forests, selecting second growth forest less than half as often as its prevalence in the local environment. The northern goshawk is typically considered a perch-hunter. Hunting efforts are punctuated by a series of quick flights low to the ground, interspersed with brief periods of scanning for unsuspecting prey from elevated perches (short duration sit-and-wait predatory movements). These flights are meant to be inconspicuous, averaging about 83 seconds in males and 94 seconds in females, and prey pursuits may be abandoned if the victims become aware of the goshawk too quickly. More sporadically, northern goshawks may watch from prey from a high soar or gliding flight above the canopy. One study in Germany found an exceptional 80% of hunting efforts to be done from a high soar but the author admitted that he was probably biased by the conspicuousness of this method. In comparison, a study from Great Britain found that 95% of hunting efforts were from perches. A strong bias for pigeons as prey and a largely urbanized environment in Germany explains the local prevalence of hunting from a soaring flight, as the urban environment provides ample thermals and obstructing tall buildings which are ideal for hunting pigeons on the wing.
Northern goshawks rarely vary from their perch-hunting style that typifies the initial part of their hunt but seems to be able to show nearly endless variation to the concluding pursuit. Hunting goshawks seem to not only utilize thick vegetation to block them from view for their prey (as typical of Accipiters) but, while hunting flying birds, they seem to be able to adjust their flight level so the prey is unable to see its hunter past their own tails. Once a prey item is selected, a short tail-chase may occur. The northern goshawk is capable of considerable, sustained, horizontal speed in pursuit of prey with speeds of 38 mph (61 km/h) reported. While pursuing prey, northern goshawks has been described both “reckless” and “fearless”, able to pursue their prey through nearly any conditions. There are various times goshawks have been observed going on foot to pursue prey, at times running without hesitation (in a crow-like, but more hurried gait) into dense thickets and brambles (especially in pursuit of galliforms trying to escape), as well as into water (i.e. usually waterfowl). Anecdotal cases have been reported when goshawks have pursue domestic prey into barns and even houses. Prey pursuits may become rather prolonged depending upon the goshawk’s determination and hunger, ranging up to 15 minutes while harrying a terrified, agile squirrel or hare, and occasional pair hunting may benefit goshawks going after agile prey. As is recorded in many accipitrids, hunting in pairs (or “tandem hunting”) normally consist of a breeding pair, with one bird flying conspicuously to distract the prey, while the other swoops in from behind to ambush the victim. When gliding down from a perch to capture prey, a goshawk may not even beat its wings, rendering its flight nearly silent. Prey is killed by driving the talons into the quarry and squeezing while the head is held back to avoid flailing limbs, frequently followed by a kneading action until the prey stops struggling. Kills are normally consumed on the ground by juvenile or non-breeding goshawks (more rarely an elevated perch or old nest) or taken to a low perch by breeding goshawks. Habitual perches are used for dismantling prey especially in the breeding season, often called “plucking perches”, which are may consist fallen logs, bent-over trees, stumps or rocks and can see years of usage. Northern goshawks often leave larger portions of their prey uneaten than other raptors, with limbs, many feathers and fur and other body parts strewn near kill sites and plucking perches, and are helpful to distinguish their kills from other raptors such as large owls, who usually eat everything. The daily food requirements of a single goshawks are around 120 to 150 g (4.2 to 5.3 oz) and most kills can feed a goshawk for 1 to 3 days. Northern goshawks sometimes cache prey on tree branches or wedged in a crotch between branches for up to 32 hours. This is done primarily during the nestling stage. Hunting success rates have been very roughly estimated at 15–30%, within average range for a bird of prey, but may be reported as higher elsewhere. One study claimed hunting success rates for pursuing rabbits was 60% and corvids was 63.8%.
Northern goshawks are usually opportunistic predators, as are most birds of prey. The most important prey species are small to medium-sized mammals and medium to large-sized birds found in forest, edge and scrub habitats. Primary prey selection varies considerably not just at the regional but also the individual level as the primary food species can be dramatically different in nests just a few kilometers apart. As is typical in various birds of prey, small prey tends to be underrepresented in prey remains below habitual perches and nests (as only present in skeletal remains within pellets) whereas pellets underrepresent large prey (which is usually dismantled away from the nest) and so a combined study of both remains and pellets is recommended to get a full picture of goshawks’ diets. Prey selection also varies by season and a majority of dietary studies are conducted within the breeding season, leaving a possibility of bias for male-selected prey, whereas recent advanced in radio-tagging have allowed a broader picture of goshawk’s fairly different winter diet (without needing to kill goshawks to examine their stomach contents). Northern goshawks have a varied diet that has reportedly included over 500 species from across its range, and at times their prey spectrum can extend to nearly any available kind of bird or mammal except the particularly large varieties as well as atypical prey including reptiles and amphibians, fish and insects. However, a few prey families dominate the diet in most parts of the range, namely corvids, pigeons, grouse, pheasants, thrushes and woodpeckers (in roughly descending order of importance) among birds and squirrels (mainly tree squirrels but also ground squirrels especially in North America) and rabbits and hares among mammals.
Birds are usually the primary prey in Europe, constituting 76.5% of the diet in 17 studies. In North America, by comparison, they constitute 47.8% in 33 studies and mammals account for a nearly equal portion of the diet and in some areas rather dominate the food spectrum. Studies have shown that from several parts of the Eurasian continent from Spain to the Ural mountains mammals contributed only about 9% of the breeding season diet. However, mammals may be slightly underrepresented in Eurasian data because of the little-studied presence of mammals as a food source in winter, particularly in the western and southern portions of Europe where the lack of snowfall can allow large numbers of rabbits. Staple prey for northern goshawks usually weighs between 50 and 2,000 g (1.8 and 70.5 oz), with average prey weights per individual studies typically between 215 and 770 g (7.6 and 27.2 oz). There is some difference in size and type between the prey caught by males and larger females. Prey selection between sexes is more disparate in the more highly dimorphic races from Eurasia than those from North America. In the Netherlands, male prey averaged 277 g (9.8 oz) whereas female prey averaged 505 g (17.8 oz), thus a rough 45% difference . In comparison, the average prey caught by each sex in Arizona was 281.5 g (9.93 oz) and 380.4 g (13.42 oz), respectively, or around a 26% difference. Northern goshawks often select young prey during spring and summer, attacking both nestling and fledgling birds and infant and yearling mammals, as such prey is often easiest to catch and convenient to bring to the nest. In general, goshawks in Fennoscandia, shift their prey selection to when the birds produce their young: first waterfowl, then quickly to corvids and thrushes and then lastly to grouse, even though adults are also freely caught opportunistically for all these prey types. This is fairly different from Vendsyssel, Denmark, where mostly adult birds were caught except for thrushes and corvids, as in these two groups, the goshawks caught mostly fledglings.
Overall, one prey family that is taken in nearly every known part of the goshawk’s range is the corvids. Some 24 species have been reported in the diet. The second most commonly reported prey species in breeding season dietary studies from both Europe and North America are both large jays, the 160 g (5.6 oz) Eurasian jay (Glarius glandarius) and the 128 g (4.5 oz) Steller's jay (Cyanocitta stelleri). which in studies from northeastern Poland and the Apennines of Italy (where the Eurasian jays made up a quarter of the food by number) and in northwestern Oregon and the Kaibab Plateau of Arizona (where the Steller's made up 37% by number) were the main prey species by number. The conspicuously loud vocalizations, somewhat sluggish flight (when hunting adult or post-fledging individuals) and moderate size of these jays make them ideal for prey-gathering male goshawks. Another medium-sized corvid, the 218 g (7.7 oz) Eurasian magpie (Pica pica) is also amongst the most widely reported secondary prey species for goshawks there. Magpies, like large jays, are rather slow fliers and can be handily outpaced by a pursuing goshawk. Some authors claim that taking of large corvids is a rare behavior, due of their intelligence and complex sociality which in turn impart formidable group defenses and mobbing capabilities. One estimation claimed this to be done by about 1–2% of adult goshawks during the breeding season (based largely on studies from Sweden and England), however, on the contrary many goshawks do routinely hunt crows and similar species. In fact, there’s some recorded cases where goshawks were able to exploit such mobbing behavior in order to trick crows into close range, where the mob victim suddenly turned to grab one predaceously. In the following areas Corvus species were the leading prey by number: the 440 g (16 oz) hooded crow (Corvus cornix) in the Ural mountains (9% by number), the 245 g (8.6 oz) western jackdaw (Corvus monedula) in Sierra de Guadarrama, Spain (36.4% by number), the 453 g (0.999 lb) rook (Corvus frugilegus) in the Zhambyl district, Kazakhstan (36.6% by number) and the 457 g (1.008 lb) American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) in New York and Pennsylvania (44.8% by number). Despite evidence that northern goshawks avoid nesting near common ravens (Corvus corax), the largest widespread corvid (about the same size as a goshawk at 1,040 g (2.29 lb)) and a formidable opponent even one-on-one, they are even known to prey on ravens seldomly. Corvids taken have ranged in size from the 72 g (2.5 oz) gray jay (Perisoreus canadensis) to the raven.
Pigeons and doves
In Europe, the leading prey species numerically (the main prey species in 41% of 32 European studies largely focused on the nesting season) is the 352 g (12.4 oz) rock pigeon (Columba livia). Although the predominance of rock pigeons in urban environments that host goshawks such as the German cities of Hamburg (where they constituted 36% by number and nearly 45% by weight of the local diet) or Cologne is predictable, evidence shows that these development-clinging pigeons are sought out even within ample conserved woodland from Portugal to Georgia. In areas where goshawk restrict their hunting forays to field and forest, they often catch another numerous pigeon, the 490 g (1.08 lb) common wood pigeon (Columba palumbus) (the largest pigeon the goshawk naturally encounters and is known to hunt). The latter species was the main prey in the diet of northern goshawks from in the Dutch-German border (37.7% of 4125 prey items) and Wales (25.1% by number and 30.5% by biomass of total prey). It has been theorized that male goshawks in peri-urban regions may be better suited with their higher agility to ambushing rock pigeons in and amongst various manmade structures whereas females may be better suited due the higher overall speeds to taking out common wood-pigeons, as these typically forage in wood-cloaked but relatively open fields; however males are efficient predators of common wood-pigeons as well. Studies have proven that, while hunting rock pigeons, goshawks quite often select the oddly colored pigeons out of flocks as prey, whether the plumage of the flock is predominantly dark or light hued, they disproportionately often select individuals of the other color. This preference is apparently more pronounced in older, experienced goshawks and there is some evidence that the males who select oddly-colored pigeons have higher average productivity during breeding. Around eight additional species of pigeon and dove have turned up in the goshawks diet from throughout the range but only in small numbers and in most of North America, goshawks take pigeons less commonly than in Eurasia. One exception is in Connecticut where the mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), the smallest known pigeon or dove the goshawk has hunted at 119 g (4.2 oz), was the second most numerous prey species.
The northern goshawk is in some parts of its range considered a specialized predator of gamebirds, particularly grouse. All told 33 species of this order have turned up in their diet, including most of the species either native to or introduced in North America and Europe. Numerically, only in the well-studied taiga habitats of Scandinavia, Canada and Alaska and some areas of the eastern United States do grouse typically take a dominant position. Elsewhere in the range, gamebirds are often secondary in number but often remain one of the most important contributors of prey biomass to nests. With their general ground-dwelling habits, gamebirds tend to be fairly easy for goshawks to overtake if they remain unseen and, if made aware of the goshawk, the prey chooses to run rather than fly. If frightened too soon, gamebirds may take flight and may be chased for some time, although the capture rates are reduced considerably when this occurs. Pre-fledgling chicks of gamebirds are particularly vulnerable due to the fact that they can only run when being pursued. In several parts of Scandinavia, forest grouse have historically been important prey for goshawks both in and out of the nesting season, principally the 1,080 g (2.38 lb) black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) and the 430 g (15 oz) hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) followed in numbers by larger 2,950 g (6.50 lb) western capercaillies (Tetrao urogallus) and the 570 g (1.26 lb) willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus) which replace the other species in the lower tundra zone. The impression of goshawks on the populations of this prey is considerable, possibly the most impactful of any predator in northern Europe considering their proficiency as predators and similarity of habitat selection to forest grouse. An estimated 25-26% of adult hazel grouses in Finnish and Swedish populations in a few studies fall victim to goshawks, whereas about 14% of adult black grouse are lost to this predator. Lesser numbers were reportedly culled in one study from northern Finland. However, adult grouse are less important in the breeding season diet than young birds, an estimated 30% of grouse taken by Scandinavian goshawks in summer were neonatal chicks whereas 53% were about fledgling age, the remaining 17% being adult grouse. This is fairly different than in southeastern Alaska, where grouse are similarly as important as in Fennoscandia, as 32.1% of avian prey deliveries were adults, 14.4% were fledglings and 53.5% were nestlings.
Northern goshawks can show somewhat of a trend for females to be taken more so than males while hunting adult gamebirds, due to the larger size and more developed defenses of males (such as leg spurs present for defense and innerspecies conflicts in male of most pheasant species). Some authors have claimed this of male ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus cochilus), but these trends are not reported everywhere, as in southern Sweden equal numbers of adult male and female ring-necked pheasants, both sexes averaging 1,135 g (2.502 lb), were taken. While male goshawks can take black and hazel grouse of any age and thence deliver them to nests, they can only take capercaillie of up to adult hen size, averaging some 1,800 g (4.0 lb), the cock capercaillie at more than twice as heavy as the hen is too large for a male goshawk to overtake. However, adult female goshawks have been reported attacking and killing cock capercaillie, mainly during winter. These average about 4,000 g (8.8 lb) in body mass and occasionally may weigh even more when dispatched. Similarly impressive feats of attacks on other particularly large gamebirds have been reported elsewhere in the range, including the 2,770 g (6.11 lb) Altai snowcock (Tetraogallus altaicus) in Mongolia and, in at least one case, successful predation on an estimated 3,900 g (8.6 lb) adult-sized young wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) hen in North America (by an immature female goshawk weighing approximately 1,050 g (2.31 lb)), although taking adults of much larger-bodied prey like this is considered generally rare, the young chicks and poults of such prey species are likely much more often taken. At the other end of the size scale, the smallest gamebird known to be hunted by northern goshawk was the 96 g (3.4 oz) common quail. Domestic fowl, particularly chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) are taken occasionally, especially where wild prey populations are depleted. While other raptors are at times blamed for large numbers of attacks on fowl, goshawks are reportedly rather more likely to attack chickens during the day than other raptors and are probably the most habitual avian predator of domestic fowl, at least in the temperate-zone. Particularly large numbers of chickens have been reported in Wigry National Park, Poland (4th most regular prey species and contributing 15.3% of prey weight), Belarus and the Ukraine, being the third most regularly reported prey in the latter two.
In a study of British goshawks, the red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica), a race of willow ptarmigan, was found to be the leading prey species (26.2% of prey by number). In La Segarra, Spain, the 528 g (1.164 lb) red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) is the most commonly reported prey species (just over 18% by number and 24.5% by weight). Despite reports that grouse are less significant as prey to American goshawks, the 560 g (1.23 lb) ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) is one of the most important prey species in North America (fourth most reported prey species in 22 studies), having been the leading prey species for goshawks in studies from New York, New Jersey and Connecticut (from 12 to 25% of prey selected) and reported as taken in high numbers elsewhere in several parts of their mutual range. The 1,056 g (2.328 lb) sooty grouse (Dendragapus fuliginosus) was reported as the leading prey species in southern Alaska (28.4% by number). In the boreal forests of Alberta, grouse are fairly important prey especially in winter.
Among mammalian prey, indisputably the most significant by number are the squirrels. All told, 44 members of the Sciuridae have turned up in their foods. Tree squirrels are the most obviously co-habitants with goshawks and are indeed taken in high numbers. Alongside martens, northern goshawks are perhaps the most efficient temperate-zone predators of tree squirrels. Goshawks are large and powerful enough to overtake even the heaviest tree squirrels unlike smaller Accipiters and have greater agility and endurance in pursuits than do most buteonine hawks, some of which like red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) regularly pursue tree squirrels but have relatively low hunting success rates due to the agility of squirrels. The 296 g (10.4 oz) red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) of Eurasia is the most numerous mammalian prey in European studies and the sixth most often recorded prey species there overall. In Oulu, Finland during winter (24.6% by number), in Białowieża Forest, Poland (14.3%), in the Chřiby uplands of the Czech Republic (8.5%) and in Forêt de Bercé, France (12%) the red squirrel was the main prey species for goshawks. In North America, tree squirrels are even more significant as prey, particularly the modestly-sized pine squirrels which are the single most important prey type for American goshawks overall. Particularly the 240 g (8.5 oz) American red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) is significant, being the primary prey in studies from Minnesota, South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana (in each comprising more than 30% of the diet and present in more than half of known pellets) but also reported everywhere in their foods from the eastern United States to Alaska and Arizona. Much like the American marten (Martes americana), the American distribution of goshawks is largely concurrent with that of American red squirrels, indicating the particular significance of it as a dietary staple. In the Pacific northwest, the 165 g (5.8 oz) Douglas squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasii) replaces the red squirrel in both distribution and as the highest contributor to goshawk diets from northern California to British Columbia. The largest occurrence of Douglas squirrel known was from Lake Tahoe, where they constituted 23% of prey by number and 32.9% by weight.
Larger tree squirrels are also taken opportunistically, in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, the 530 g (1.17 lb) eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) was the third most significant prey species. Much larger tree squirrels such as western gray squirrels (Sciurus griseus) and fox squirrels (Sciurus niger), both weighing about 800 g (1.8 lb), are taken occasionally in North America. Ground squirrels are also important prey species, mostly in North America, 25 of 44 of squirrel species found in the diet are ground squirrels. Particularly widely reported as a secondary food staple from Oregon, Wyoming, California and Arizona was the 187 g (6.6 oz) golden-mantled ground squirrel (Callospermophilus lateralis). In Nevada and Idaho’s Sawtooth National Forest, the 285 g (10.1 oz) Belding's ground squirrel (Urocitellus beldingi) fully dominated the food spectrum, comprising up to 74.3% of the prey by number and 84.2% by biomass. Even much bigger ground squirrels such as prairie dogs and marmots are attacked on occasion. Several hoary marmots (Marmota caligala) were brought to nests in southeast Alaska but averaged only 1,894 g (4.176 lb), so were young animals about half of the average adult (spring) weight (albeit still considerably heavier than the goshawks who took them). In some cases, adult marmots such as alpine marmots (Marmota marmota), yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris) and woodchucks (Marmota monax) have been preyed upon when lighter and weaker in spring, collectively weighing on average about 3,500 g (7.7 lb) or about three times as much as a female goshawk although are basically half of what these marmots can weigh by fall. About a dozen species of chipmunk are known to be taken by goshawks and the 96 g (3.4 oz) eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus) were the second most numerous prey species at nests in central New York and Minnesota. Squirrels taken have ranged in size from the 43 g (1.5 oz) least chipmunk (Tamias minimus) to the aforementioned adult marmots.
Hares and rabbits
Northern goshawks can be locally heavy predators of lagomorphs, of which they take at least 15 species as prey. Especially in the Iberian peninsula, the native European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is often delivered to nests and can be the most numerous prey. Even where taken secondarily in numbers in Spain to gamebirds such as in La Segarra, Spain, rabbits tend to be the most significant contributor of biomass to goshawk nests. On average, the weight of rabbits taken in La Segarra was 662 g (1.459 lb) (making up 38.4% of the prey biomass there), indicating most of the 333 rabbits taken there were yearlings and about 2-3 times lighter than a prime adult wild rabbit. In England, where the European rabbit is an introduced species, it was the third most numerous prey species at nests. In more snowbound areas where wild and feral rabbits are absent, larger hares may be taken and while perhaps more difficult to subdue than most typical goshawk prey, are a highly nutritious food source. In Finland, females were found to take mountain hare (Lepus timidus) fairly often and they were the second most numerous prey item for goshawks in winter (14.8% by number). In North America, where mammals are more important in the diet, more lagomorphs are taken. In Oregon, snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) are the largest contributor of biomass to goshawks foods (making up to 36.6% of the prey by weight), in eastern Oregon at least 60% of hares taken were adults weighing on average 1,500 g (3.3 lb), and in one of three studies from Oregon be the most numerous prey species (second most numerous in the other two). This species was also the second most numerous food species in Alberta throughout the year and the most important prey by weight. Eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus), also averaging some 1,500 g (3.3 lb) in mass per the study (and thus mostly consisting of adult cottontails in their prime), were the most significant prey both by weight (42.3%) and number (13.3%) in Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest of Arizona. Eastern cottontails are also taken regularly in New York and Pennsylvania. In some parts of the range, larger leporids may be attacked, extending to the 2,410 g (5.31 lb) black-tailed (Lepus californicus) and the 3,200 g (7.1 lb) white-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii), the 3,800 g (8.4 lb) European hares (Lepus europaeus), as well as the mountain hare. In Europe, males have been recorded successfully attacking rabbits weighing up to 1,600 g (3.5 lb), or about 2.2 times their own weight, while adult mountain hares overtaken by female goshawks in Fennoscandia have weighed from 2,700 to 3,627 g (5.952 to 7.996 lb) or up to 2.4 times their own weight. Despite historic claims that taking prey so considerably larger than themselves is exceptional beyond a small region of Fennoscandia, there is evidence that as grouse numbers have mysteriously declined since 1960, adult mountain hare are increasingly the leading prey for wintering female goshawks, favoring and causing an increase of larger bodied females in order to overpower such a substantial catch. Asian and American goshawks also take about a half dozen species of pikas, much smaller cousins of rabbits and hares, but they are at best supplementary prey for American goshawks and of unknown importance to little-studied Asian populations.
Some 21 species of woodpecker have been reported from northern goshawk food studies around the world. With their relatively slow, undulating flight adult and fledged woodpeckers can easily be overtaken by hunting goshawks, not to mention their habitat preferences frequently put them within active goshawk ranges. Most of the widespread species from Europe and North America have been observed as prey, most commonly relatively large woodpeckers such as the 76 g (2.7 oz) greater spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) and the 176 g (6.2 oz) European green woodpecker (Picus viridis) in Europe and the 134 g (4.7 oz) northern flicker (Colaptes auratus) in North America. Indeed, the flicker is the third most regularly reported prey species in America. In south-central Wyoming, the northern flicker was the second most numerous prey species and it was the main prey species in a study from New Mexico (here making up 26.4% of prey by number). All sizes of woodpeckers available are taken from the 19.8 g (0.70 oz) lesser spotted woodpecker (Dryobates minor) to the 321 g (11.3 oz) black woodpecker (Dryocopus martius) in Europe and from the 25.6 g (0.90 oz) downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens) to the 287 g (10.1 oz) pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) in North America. In many areas, northern goshawks will pursue water birds of several varieties, although they rarely form a large portion of the diet. Perhaps the most often recorded water birds in the diet are ducks. All told, 32 waterfowl have been recorded in their diet. In the Ural mountains, the nearly cosmopolitan 1,075 g (2.370 lb) mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) was third most numerous prey species. The ducks of the genus Aythya are somewhat frequently recorded as well, especially since their tree-nesting habits may frequently put them in the hunting range of nesting goshawks. Similarly, the wood duck (Aix sponsa) from America and the mandarin duck (Aix galericulata) from Asia may be more vulnerable than most waterfowl at their tree nests. Although etymologists feel that the goshawk is an abbreviation of “goose-hawk”, geese are seldomly taken considering their generally much larger size. Nonetheless, four species have been taken, including adults of species as large as the 2,420 g (5.34 lb) greater white-fronted goose (Anser albifrons). Adult common eiders (Somateria mollissima), the largest northern duck at 2,066 g (4.555 lb), have also been captured by goshawks. Various other water birds reported as taken include red-throated loon (Gavia stellata) chicks, adult little grebes (Tachybaptus ruficollis), adult great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) (about the same size as a greater white-fronted goose), adult crested ibis (Nipponia nippon), black stork (Ciconia nigra) chicks and five species each of heron and rail. Among shorebirds (or small waders), goshawks have been reported preying on 22 sandpipers, 8 plovers, 10 species of gull and tern, 2 species of alcids and the Eurasian stone-curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus), the Eurasian oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus) and the long-tailed jaeger (Stercorarius longicaudus).
Corvids as aforementioned are quite important prey. Although they take fewer passerines than other northern Accipiters, smaller types of songbirds can still be regionally important to the diet. This is especially true of the thrushes which are often delivered to nests in Europe. 17 species of thrush have been identified in goshawk food across their range. The numerous 103 g (3.6 oz) Eurasian blackbird (Turdus merula) is often most reported from this family and can even be the main prey at some locations such as in the Netherlands (23.5% of prey by number) and in Norway (just over 14% by number and two studies showed thrushes collectively make up nearly half of the prey items in Norwegian nests). All common Turdus species are taken in some numbers in Europe, being quite regular and conspicuous in the woodland edge zones most often patrolled by male goshawks, especially while singing in spring and summer. Even where larger, more nutritious prey is present such as at pheasant release sites, the abundant thrushes are more often delivered to the nest because of the ease of capture such as in Norway. Smaller numbers of thrush are taken in general in North America but the 78 g (2.8 oz) American robin (Turdus migratorius) are fairly regular prey nonetheless and were the most numerous prey in the Sierra Nevadas of California (30.7% by number and 21.4% by weight). Thrush taken have ranged in size from the 26.4 g (0.93 oz) western bluebird (Sialia mexicana), the smallest bluebird and lightest North American thrush on average, to the 118 g (4.2 oz) mistle thrush (Turdus viscivorus), Europe’s largest thrush. Beyond corvids and thrushes, most passerines encountered by northern goshawks are substantially smaller and are often ignored under most circumstances in favor of more sizable prey. Nonetheless, more than a hundred passerines have been recorded their diet beyond these families. Most widespread passerine families from North America and Europe have occasional losses to goshawks, including tyrant flycatchers, shrikes, vireos, larks, swallows, nuthatches, treecreepers, wrens, mimids, Old World warblers, Old World flycatchers, pipits and wagtails, starlings, waxwings, New World warblers, emberizine sparrows, cardinalids, icterids, finches and Old World sparrows. Avian prey has even ranged to as small as the 5.5 g (0.19 oz) goldcrest (Regulus regulus), the smallest bird in Europe. In North America, the smallest known bird prey is the 8.2 g (0.29 oz) American redstart (Setophaga ruticilla). Among smaller types of passerines, one of the most widely reported are finches and, in some widespread studies, somewhat substantial numbers of finches of many species may actually be taken. Finches tend to fly more conspicuously as they cover longer distances, often bounding or undulating as they do, over the canopy than most forest songbirds, which may make them more susceptible to goshawk attacks than other small songbirds. Non-passerine upland birds taken by goshawks in small numbers include nightjars, swifts, bee-eaters, kingfishers, rollers, hoopoes and parrots.
Outside of the squirrel family, relatively few other types of rodents are taken in many regions. In eastern Oregon, the 132 g (4.7 oz) northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) (flying squirrels are not true squirrels) was the third or fourth most frequently caught prey species. Microtine rodents which are so essential to most northern non-accipiter hawks and a majority of owls are at best a secondary contributor to goshawk diets, even though 26 species have been reported in their diet. Exceptionally, in a study of the Carpathian mountains of the Ukraine, the 27.5 g (0.97 oz) common vole (Microtus arvalis) was the second most numerous prey species. Relatively high numbers of the 18.4 g (0.65 oz) bank vole (Myodes glareolus) were reported in diets from Poland in Gmina Sobótka and the Białowieża Forest. During summer in Alberta, the 44 g (1.6 oz) meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) was the third most frequently reported prey species, the only known study where large numbers of microtine rodents were taken in North America. Microtine rodents taken by goshawks have ranged in size from the 11 g (0.39 oz) western harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis) to the 1,105 g (2.436 lb) muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus). Other miscellaneous rodents reported sporadically in the diet include dormice, porcupines, kangaroo rats, mountain beavers (Aplodontia rufa), jumping mice, Old World mice and rats, zokors, gophers and jirds.
Insectivores are taken in low numbers including moles, shrews and hedgehogs. The smallest mammalian prey species known to be attacked by goshawks was the 3.65 g (0.129 oz) masked shrew (Sorex cinereus). Even more sporadically attacked by goshawks, given this prey’s nocturnal habits, are bats. In one case a juvenile golden snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana), which was successfully taken by a goshawk. Ungulates such as deer and sheep are sometimes consumed by goshawks but there is no evidence that they prey on live ones (as much larger accipitrids such as eagles can sometimes do), but these are more likely rare cases of scavenging on carrion, which may more regularly occur than once thought in areas with harsh winter weather.
In a few cases, northern goshawks have been recorded hunting and killing prey beyond birds and mammals. In some of the warmer drier extensions of their range, reptiles may be available to them to hunt. Only one species of snake is recorded from their diet, the small innocuous grass snake (Natrix natrix), at 66 g (2.3 oz); however about a half dozen lizards are recorded in their diet, primarily from the Iberian peninsula but also from the Ural mountains and the American southwest. The only known location in the northern goshawk’s range where reptiles were taken in large numbers was Sierra de Guadarrama, Spain, where the 77 g (2.7 oz) ocellated lizard (Timon lepidus) was the second most numerous prey species. Amphibians are even rarer in the diet, only recorded more than singly in one study each from Spain and from England. Fish are similarly rare in the diet, recorded twice each in Bavaria and Belarus. A few pellets have included remains of insects, much of which may be ingested incidentally or via the stomachs of birds that they have consumed. However, there is some evidence they at times will hunt large ground-dwelling insects such as dung beetles.
Interspecies predatory relationships
Northern goshawks are often near the top of the avian food chain in forested biomes but face competition for food resources from various other predators, including both birds and mammals. Comparative dietary studies have shown that mean sizes of prey, both in terms of its size relative to the raptor itself and absolute weight, for goshawks is relatively larger than in most buteonine hawks in North America and Europe. Studies show even buteonine hawks slightly larger than goshawks on average take prey weighing less than 200 g (7.1 oz) whereas average goshawk prey is usually well over such a mass. This is due largely to the much higher importance of microtine rodents to most buteonine hawks, which, despite their occasional abundance, are ignored by goshawks in most regions. Similarly, mean prey mass for sharp-shinned and Cooper's hawks in North America is between about 10 and 30% of their own mass, whereas the mean prey of American goshawks is between about 25 and 50% of their own mass and therefore are the goshawks takes prey that is on average relatively much larger. In many of the ecosystems that they inhabit, northern goshawks compete with resources with other predators, particularly where they take sizeable numbers of lagomorphs. About a dozen mammalian and avian predators in each area all primarily consume European rabbits and snowshoe hares alongside goshawks in the Iberian peninsula and the American boreal forest regions where these became primary staple foods. Like those co-habitant predators, the goshawk suffers declines during the low portion in the lagomorph’s breeding cycles, which rise and fall cyclically every 10 to 12 years. However, even where these are primary food sources, the northern goshawk is less specialized than many (even Bubo owls, some of the more generalist avian predators become extremely specialized lagomorph hunters locally, to a greater extent than goshawks) and can alternate their food selection, often taking equal or greater numbers of tree squirrels and woodland birds. Due to this dietary variation, the northern goshawk is less affected than other raptorial birds by prey population cycles and tends to not be depleted by resource competition.
Despite their propensity to pursue relatively large prey and capability to pursue alternate prey, northern goshawks can be locally outcompeted for resources by species that are more adaptable and flexible, especially in terms of habitat and prey. Most northern buteonine hawks largely take small rodents such as voles (which are usually ignored by goshawks) but can adapt to nearly any other type of prey when the staple local rodent prey populations go down. Comparisons with goshawks and red-tailed hawk nesting in abutting areas of Arizona (other large common Buteos like Swainson's hawks (Buteo swainsonii) and ferruginous hawks (Buteo regalis) utilize open habitats and so do not come into conflict with goshawks) shows the red-tailed hawks as being able to take a broader range of prey than goshawks and nest in more varied habitats, the latter species being perhaps the most commonly seen, widespread and adaptable of diurnal American raptors. On occasion, goshawks are robbed of their prey by a diversity of other birds, including harriers, other hawks, eagles, falcons and even gulls.
Northern goshawks from North America are less prone to nesting outside of mature forests and take larger numbers of mammals as opposed to abundant birds than in Europe. This may be in part due to heavier competition from a greater diversity of raptors in North America. In Europe, the goshawk only co-exists with the much smaller sparrowhawk within its own genus, while in North America, it lives with the intermediately-sized Cooper's hawk. The latter species much more readily nests in semi-open and developed areas of North America than goshawks there and hunts a broad assemblage of medium-sized birds, whereas such prey is more readily available to male goshawks from Europe than to goshawks in North America. Although the Cooper's hawk usually avoids and loses individual contests against the larger goshawk, its adaptability has allowed it to become the most widespread and commonly found North American Accipiter. The slightly larger goshawks of Europe have been shown, in some but not all areas, to outcompete and possibly lower productivity of the slightly smaller common buzzard (Buteo buteo) when their ranges overlap. Usually, however, the dietary habits and nesting preferences are sufficiently distinct and thus effect neither buzzard or goshawk populations. Both can mutually be very common even when the other is present. On the other hand, American goshawks are slightly smaller on average than their European counterparts and can be up to 10% smaller in mass than red-tailed hawks. However, studies have indicated that the goshawk has, beyond its superior speed and agility, has stronger feet and a more forceful attack than that of the red-tailed hawk. All in all, individual competitions between red-tailed hawks and goshawks can go either way and neither is strongly likely to deter the other from nesting given their distinct nesting habitats. Other raptors, including most medium to large-sized owls as well as red-tailed hawks and falcons, will use nests built by northern goshawks, even when goshawks are still in the area.
To many other raptorial birds, the northern goshawk is more significant as a predatory threat than as competition. The northern goshawk is one of the most dangerous species to other raptors, especially to those considerably smaller than itself. In many cases, raptors of any age from nestlings to adults are taken around their nests but free-flying raptors too are readily taken or ambushed at a perch. One example is a study from northern England, the common kestrels (Falco tinnunculus), which average about 184 g (6.5 oz), recorded as prey at goshawk nests (mainly in March and April) numbered 139, a larger number than kestrels recorded alive in the spring in the same area. In the Veluwe province of the Netherlands, the percentage of nest of European honey buzzards (Pernis apivorus), weighing on average 760 g (1.68 lb), predated by goshawks increased from a little as 7.7% in 1981–1990 to 33% in 2000–2004. As their habitat preferences may overlap with goshawks, all other Accipiters encountered may be predated in multiple cases, including the 238 g (8.4 oz) Eurasian sparrowhawk, the 188 g (6.6 oz) levant sparrowhawk (Accipiter brevipes), the 136 g (4.8 oz) sharp-shinned hawk, the 122 g (4.3 oz) Japanese sparrowhawk (Accipiter gularis) and the 440 g (0.97 lb) Cooper's hawk.
Other assorted accipitrids of up to their own size to be predated by goshawks include the 747 g (1.647 lb) black kite (Milvus migrans), the 1,080 g (2.38 lb) red kite (Milvus milvus), the 712 g (1.570 lb) western marsh-harrier (Circus aeruginosus), the 316 g (11.1 oz) Montagu's harrier (Circus pygargus), the 390 g (14 oz) pallid harrier (Circus macrourus) and Buteos of up to adults including the 776 g (1.711 lb) common buzzard, the 424 g (15.0 oz) broad-winged hawk (Buteo platypterus), the 610 g (1.34 lb) red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus) and the 1,065 g (2.348 lb) red-tailed hawk. Even raptors somewhat larger than a northern goshawks have been considered as prey, although it is not clear whether adults are among the victims, including the 1,494 g (3.294 lb) osprey (Pandion haliaetus), 1,147 g (2.529 lb) crested honey-buzzard (Pernis ptilorhynchus) and the 1,370 g (3.02 lb) lesser spotted eagle (Clanga pomarina).
Outside of the accipitrid group, heavy predation on different varieties of raptorial birds by northern goshawks can continue unabated. Many types of owl are taken and in Europe, the northern goshawk is the second most prolific predator of owls behind the Eurasian eagle owl (Bubo bubo). In Bavaria, Germany, the 287 g (10.1 oz) long-eared owl (Asio otus) was the second most common prey species for nesting goshawks. In the Białowieża Forest of Poland, fairly high numbers of the 475 g (1.047 lb) tawny owl (Strix alucco) were taken. In all, some 18 species of owl have been recorded in the diet, ranging in size from the Eurasian (Glaucidium passerinum) and northern pygmy owls (Glaucidium gnoma) at 58.5 g (0.129 lb) and 61.8 g (2.18 oz), respectively, to all the large northern Strix owls including adults and even the 1,400 g (3.1 lb) great horned owl. Whether adults have ever been killed as prey though is unknown but goshawks have been known to kill great horned owls that they’ve found near their nests. In addition, about eight species of falcon have been identified in the foods of goshawks. Adult falcons of small species such as kestrels and merlins (Falco columbarius) can be overpowered quite easily if they can manage to surprise the prey. Larger falcons have turned up in the diet as well, including the 720 g (1.59 lb) prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus) and the 966 g (2.130 lb) saker falcon (Falco cherrug), although possible only nestlings of these species. Brief aerial skirmishes between goshawks and peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) have been described but neither species is known to have killed one another in the wild. In Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, at least four small passerines species were recorded as nesting close to active goshawk nest, due to the incidental shelter that the fierce goshawks inadvertently provides from smaller raptors which are their main predators. Such raptors, including Eurasian kestrels, Eurasian sparrowhawks and long-eared owls, not only avoid goshawk activity where possible but also were found to have lower nest productivity any time they nested relatively close to goshawks per the study. A similar phenomenon, with goshawks inadvertently providing shelter to small passerines, has been recorded in North America as well.
Competition for northern goshawks can also come from mammalian carnivores. Martens, and to a lesser extent other weasels, are presumably one of their more major competitors as their diet often consists of similar prey primarily during spring and summer, tree squirrels and woodland birds, but little has been studied in terms of how the two types of predator effect each other. Most recorded interactions have been predatory, as the goshawk has been recorded preying on a dozen species, from the 122 g (4.3 oz) least weasel (Mustela nivalis) to the 1,700 g (3.7 lb) stone marten (Martes foina). Northern goshawks have also been recorded as feeding on much bigger predators such as the 5,775 g (12.732 lb) red fox (Vulpes vulpes), the 4,040 g (8.91 lb) raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and the 3,500 g (7.7 lb) striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), but it is not clear whether these were actual kills, as many may be encountered as already dead carrion. Domestic carnivores are sometimes eaten, including dogs and cats, the latter of which has reportedly been taken alive by goshawks. The red fox is a surprisingly considerable competitor for resources with northern goshawks. It was found in Norway that goshawk numbers were higher when voles were at peak numbers, not due to voles as a food source but because foxes were more likely to eat the rodents and ignore grouse, whereas during low vole numbers the foxes are more likely to compete with goshawks over grouse as prey. A decrease of the fox population of Norway due to sarcoptic mange was found result in an increase of grouse numbers and, in turn, northern goshawks. In some areas, red foxes have been found to steal up to half of the goshawks’ kills.
Unlike the predators at the top of the avian food chain such as eagles and the largest owls, which are rarely endangered by predation as adults, the northern goshawk is itself susceptible to a fairly extensive range of predators. The most deadly are likely to be the Eurasian eagle owl and the great horned owl, which not only predate goshawks of any age and at any season but also opportunistically take over their own prior nests as their own nesting site. Of the two, the American horned owl nesting habits are more similar to goshawks, which most often consists of tree nests whereas the eagle owl usually nests in rock formations. Thus, the northern goshawk is more likely to victimized by the great horned owls, which can stage nightly ambushes and destroy an entire goshawk family as they pick off both adults and nestlings. In radio-tagging studies of adult and immature goshawks in the Great Lakes region and Arizona, up to half of the studied birds were killed by great horned owls at night, while the horned owls accounted for 40% of the nest failures in studies from Arizona and New Mexico. In comparison, in Schleswig-Holstein, 59% of reintroduced eagle owls used nests built by goshawks and no goshawk pairs could successfully nest within 500 m (1,600 ft) of an active eagle-owl nest. 18% of nest failures here positively were attributed to eagle owl predation, with another 8% likely due to eagle-owls. Other larger raptorial birds can threaten them. The golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) and the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) in North America, have killed wintering goshawks, but given the discrepancy in their habitat preferences, such cases are presumably rare. Other avian predators known to have successfully preyed on goshawks including adults (usually in singular cases) include white-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla), eastern imperial eagles (Aquila heliaca), snowy owls (Bubo scandiacus) and red-tailed hawks.
The same mammalian predators that sometimes compete for food with northern goshawks also sometimes kill them, with seemingly the nestlings, fledglings and brooding females with impaired flight due to their wing feather moults seemingly the most vulnerable. In one case, the American marten, which at 660 g (1.46 lb) is the smallest marten and is sometimes taken as prey by the goshawks, successfully ambushed and preyed on a brooding female goshawk. In Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest of Wisconsin, the main source of mortality for northern goshawks is reintroduced fishers (Martes pennanti), which are the largest kind of marten at 3,900 g (8.6 lb) and capably kill many chicks, fledglings and brooding females. In contrast, in Europe, the pine marten (Martes martes) has only been known to prey on young goshawks still in the nest and not adults. Other mammals capable of climbing trees have been observed or inferred to predate goshawks, either mostly or entirely young in the nests, including wolverines (Gulo gulo), North American porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum), raccoons (Procyon lotor), bobcats (Lynx rufus) and American black bears (Ursus americanus). Overall, the range of nest predators is more extensive in North America than in Eurasia, in the latter continent most recorded nest depredations are by eagle owls, with martens and corvids usually only preying on goshawk nestlings when low food supplies cause the goshawks to have lower nest attendance (and presumably effect these predators to the extent that they take the risk of coming to the goshawk nest). Fledgling goshawks are also vulnerable to canids such as coyotes (Canis latrans), gray wolves (Canis lupus) and red foxes as they may perch lower to the ground and are clumsier, more unsteady and less cautious than older birds. In one case, a goshawk that was ambushed and killed at a kill by a mangy vixen fox was able to lethally slash the windpipe of the fox, which apparently died moments after partially consuming the goshawk.
Apart for aforementioned predation events, northern goshawks have at times been killed by non-predators, including prey that turned the tables on their pursuer, as well as in hunting accidents. In one case, a huge group (or murder) of hooded crows heavily mobbed a goshawk that they caught in a relatively open spot, resulting in a prolonged attack that ended up killing the goshawk. In another instance, a goshawk drowned while attempting to capture a tufted duck (Aythya fuligula). One young goshawk managed to escape a red fox that had caught it with a chewed wing, only to drown in a nearby creek. Another, and rather gruesome, hunting mishap occurred when a goshawk caught a large mountain hare and, while attempting to hold it in place by grasping vegetation with its other foot, was torn in half.
The northern goshawk is one of the most extensively studied raptors in terms of its breeding habits. Adult goshawks return to their breeding grounds usually between March and April, but locally as early as February. If prey levels remain high, adults may remain on their breeding ground all year. Courtship flights, calls and even nest building has been recorded in Finland exceptionally in September and October right after young dispersed, whereas in most of Fennoscandia, breeding does not commence any earlier than March and even then only when it is a warm spring. Most breeding activity occurs between April and July, exceptionally a month earlier or later. Even in most areas of Alaska, most pairs have produced young by May. Courtship flights typical are above the canopy on sunny, relatively windless days in early spring with the goshawks’ long main tail feathers held together and the undertail coverts spread so wide to give them an appearance of having a short, broad-tail with a long dark strip extending from the center. Display flights not infrequently escalate into an undulating flight, similar to a wood pigeon but with sharper turns and descents, and are sometimes embellished with sky-dives that can cover over 200 m (660 ft). One study found undulating display flights more than three times more often done by males than females. After display flights have concluded, the male typically brings a prepared fresh prey item to the female as part of the courtship. In general, these displays are presumably to show (or reinforce) to the potential mate their health and prowess as breeding partner. Copulation is brief and frequent, ranging up to nearly 520 times per clutch (on average about 10 times a day or 100-300 throughout the season), and may be the male’s way of ensuring paternity since he is frequently away gathering food by the time of egg-laying, although extra-pair copulation is extremely rare. Female solicits copulations by facing away from male with drooped wings and flared tail-coverts. The male, wings drooped and tail-coverts flared, drops from a branch to gain momentum, then swoops upward and mounts her back. Both birds usually call while mating. Fidelity studies from Europe show that about 80–90% of adult females breed with the same male in consecutive years, whereas up to 96% of males mate with the same female in consecutive years. In California, 72% of males retained relationship with the same mates in consecutive years while 70% of females did the same. Males intruding in Hamburg, Germany territories were in some cases not evicted and ended up mating with the female, with the male of the pair not stopping it. In migratory, northernmost populations, mate retention in consecutive years is low. Males are sometimes killed by females during courtship and encounters can be dangerous especially if he does not bring food to courtship and he often seems nervous withdrawing with a trill at a given chance.
Nesting areas are indefinite, a nest may be used for several years, also a nest built years prior may be used or an entirely new nest may be constructed. When nest constructing, the pair will often roost together. Males construct most new nests but females may assist somewhat if reinforcing old nests. While the male is building, the female perches in the vicinity, occasionally screaming, sometimes flying to inspect the nest. At other times, the female may take a more active role, or even the primary one, in new nest construction and this is subject to considerable individual variation. For the nesting tree, more than 20 species of conifer have been used including spruce, fir, larch, pine and hemlock. Broadleaf trees used including ash, alder, aspen, beech, birch, elm, hickory, hornbeam, lime, maple (including sycamore), oak, poplar, tamarack, wild cherry and willow. In some areas, the nests may be line with hard pieces of bark and also with green sprigs of conifers. Often the tallest tree in a given stand is selected as the nest tree and this is often the dominant tree species within the given region and forest. Therefore, hardwood trees are usually used as the nesting tree in the eastern United States while conifers are usually used in the western United States. Most nest are constructed under the canopy or near the main fork of a tree and in North America, averaging nest height ranged from 5.8 m (19 ft) (in the Yukon territory) to 16.9 m (55 ft) (in New Mexico), elsewhere as in Europe average height is between 9 and 25 m (30 and 82 ft). In the dwarf trees of the tundra, nests have been found at only 1 to 2 m (3.3 to 6.6 ft) off the ground, and, in the tundra and elsewhere, very rarely on felled trees, stumps or on the ground. In some studies from North America up to 15% of nests are in dead trees but this is far rarer in Eurasia. More significant than species is the maturity and height of the nesting tree, its structure (which should have ample surface around the main fork) and, perhaps most significantly, little to no understory below it. Multiple studies note the habit of nest being built in forests close to clear-fellings, swamps and heaths, lakes and meadows, roads (especially light-use logging dirt roads), railways and swathes cut along power cables, usually near such openings there'd be prominent boulders, stones or roots of fallen trees or low branches to use as plucking points. Canopy cover averaged between 60 and 96% in Europe. As is typical in widely distributed raptors from temperate-zones, those from cold regions faced south, 65% in Alaska, 54% in Norway and also in high latitudes such as sky-forests of the Arizona Rockies, otherwise usually nests face north and east.
Nests, especially after initial construction, may average between 80 and 120 cm (31 and 47 in) in length and50 to 70 cm (20 to 28 in) in width, and are around 20 to 25 cm (7.9 to 9.8 in) deep. After many uses, a nest can range up to 160 cm (63 in) across and 120 cm (47 in) in depth and can weigh up to a ton when wet. Northern goshawks may adopt nests of other species, common buzzards contributed 5% of nests used in Schleswig-Holstein, including unusually exposed ones on edges of woods and another 2% were built by common ravens or carrion crows, but 93% were built by the goshawks themselves. While colonizing peri-urban areas in Europe, they may displace Eurasian sparrowhawks not only from their territories but may actually try to use overly small sparrowhawk nests, usually resulting in nest collapse. One nest was used continuously by different pairs for a period of 17 years. A single pair may maintain up to several nests, usually up to two will occur in an area of no more than a few hundred kilometers. One nest may be used in sequential years, but often an alternate is selected. During an 18-year-study from Germany, many alternate nests were used, 27 pairs had two, 10 had 3, 5 had 4, one had five and one pair had as many as 11. Other regions where pairs had on average two nests were Poland, California and Arizona’s Kaibab Plateau. The extent of use of alternate nests is unknown as well as their benefit, but they may reduce significant levels of parasites and diseases within the nest. In central Europe, the goshawk’s nest area can be as small 1 to 2 ha (2.5 to 4.9 acres) of woods and less than 10 hectares are commonplace. Usually only 1 active nest occurs per 100 ha (250 acres), are they avoid edges as nest sites and occupied nests are seldom less than 600 m (2,000 ft) apart. The most closely spaced active nests by a separate pair on record was 400 m (1,300 ft) in central Europe, another case of two active nests 200 m (660 ft) apart in Germany was a possible case of polygamy.
The eggs are laid at 2- to 3-day intervals on average between April and June (usually May), taking up to 9 days for a clutch of 3–4 and 11 days for a clutch of 5. The eggs are rough, unmarked pale bluish or dirty white. In A. g, atricapillus, the average dimensions of the eggs are reported at 57.76 to 59.2 mm (2.274 to 2.331 in) in height by 44.7 to 45.1 mm (1.76 to 1.78 in) in width, with ranges of 52–66 mm (2.0–2.6 in) x 42–48 mm (1.7–1.9 in). In Spanish eggs, the average dimensions were 56.3 mm × 43 mm (2.22 in × 1.69 in) compared to German ones, which averaged 57.3 mm × 44 mm (2.26 in × 1.73 in). Goshawks from Lapland, Finland lay the largest known eggs at 62–65 mm (2.4–2.6 in) x 47–49.5 mm (1.85–1.95 in), while other Finnish goshawk eggs ranged from 59–64 mm (2.3–2.5 in) x 45–48 mm (1.8–1.9 in). Weight of the eggs average 59 g (2.1 oz) in America, 63 g (2.2 oz) in Great Britain and 50 to 60 g (1.8 to 2.1 oz) in Poland and Germany, with extreme weights from the latter nations of 35 to 75 g (1.2 to 2.6 oz). Clutch size almost always averages between 2 and 4 eggs, with a median around 3, rarely as few as 1 or as many 5–6 will be laid. In combination spring weather and prey population levels seem to drive both egg laying dates and clutch size. If an entire clutch is lost, a replacement can be laid within 15 to 30 days.
During incubation, females tend to become quieter and more inconspicuous. The mother can develop a brooding patch of up to 15 by 5 cm (5.9 by 2.0 in) on her underside. She may turn the eggs as frequently as every 30 to 60 minutes. Males may incubate as many as 1 to 3 hours, but usually less than an hour, early in incubation but rarely do so later on. During daylight females can do as much as 96% of the observed incubation. The incubation stage last for any time between 28 and 37 days (rarely up to 41 days in exceptionally big clutches), varying in different parts of the range. After hatching occurs, the male does not come directly to the nest but instead just delivers food (usually already plucked, beheaded or otherwise dismembered) to a branch near the nest which the female tears apart and shares between herself and the nestlings. Food deliveries by the male can be daily or as infrequent as every 3 to 5 days. In turn, the female must feed the young about twice a day in order for the chicks to avoid starvation. Caching of food has been recorded near the nest, but only before the young start feeding themselves. Food deliveries must average about 250 to 320 g (8.8 to 11.3 oz) per young goshawk per day for them to successfully fledge, or 700 to 950 g (1.54 to 2.09 lb) total daily and 60 to 100 kg (130 to 220 lb) throughout the season for an average sized clutch of around three. Females will also start capturing prey later on, but usually only after the young have already fledged. In Europe, female goshawks may press down on their nest if a human approaches, others may unobtrusively leave the nest, although are more reluctant to leave the nest late in incubation. In North America, the behavior of parent goshawks differs, as they often vigorously defend their territories fiercely from all intruders, including passing humans. The northern goshawk has a reputation as the most aggressive American raptor when the vicinity of their nest is approached. Here, when the nest is approached (especially soon after hatching) the goshawk will engage in their defensive kakking vocal display accompanied by exaggerated swooping in flight which quickly phases into a violent attack, potentially causing painful (but usually minor) injuries and blood loss. Research has indicated that attacks on humans are mostly done by adult females (more than 80% of the time) and are rarely pressed unless a person is by themselves. However, large groups and loud noise can appear to irritate the female and may cause her to attack the next lone person who comes near the nest. The higher aggression towards humans in North America than in Europe has been linked to both a more extensive range of potential nest predators for American goshawks causing them to develop a more aggressive display or the lower rates of persecution in America than in Europe, who may account for the relative shyness in the latter continent. Occasionally, both males and females have been recorded abandoning the nest and their mates. There are a few rare cases where males successfully reared up to 4 young after the female abandoned the nest or was killed between the 2 and 3rd week. Otherwise male will continue delivering prey but without the female all the nestlings will starve to death and the food simply rots. In cases where the male abandons the female and the brood, she may be able to successfully brood but usually only nestling is likely to survive to fledge without the male’s contribution of prey. At other times the mother may be replaced, sometimes forcefully, by another female, usually an older mature one. Exceptional cases of polygamy, with a male mating with two females, have been reported in Germany and The Netherlands and typically these breeding attempts fail.
Hatching and development
Hatching is asynchronous but not completely, usually an average sized clutch takes only 2 to 3 days to hatch, although it may take up to 6 days to hatch a clutch of more than 4 eggs. Hatchlings start calling from within the shell as much as 38 hours before hatching, as a faint chep, chep, chack, peep, peep, peep may be heard. The young are covered with down and altricial (as are all raptors) at first but develop rapidly. Hatchlings measure about 13 cm (5.1 in) long at first and grow about 5 to 9 cm (2.0 to 3.5 in) in length each week until they fledge. The mothers typically brood the nestlings intensively for about two weeks, around the time grayer feathers start to develop through the nestlings’ down. The most key time for development may be at three weeks when the nestlings can stand a bit and start to develop their flight feathers. Also at the three-week stage, they can reach about half the adults’ weight and females start to noticeably outgrow the males. However, this growth requires increased food delivery so frequently results in lower nest attendance and, in turn, higher predation rates. Also rates of starvation at this stage can exceed 50% especially in the youngest of large clutches of 4 to 5. Nestlings at 4 weeks are starting to develop strong flight feathers, which they frequently flap; also they can start to pull on food but are still mainly fed by female and begin to make a whistling scream when she goes to fetch food from the male. More active feeding behavior by nestlings may increase their aggression towards each other. By the 5th week, they've developed many typical goshawk behaviors, sometimes mantling over food, testing balance by extending one leg and one wing at edge of nest (called "warbling" by falconers) and can wag their tails vigorously. Starvation risk also increases at this point due to their growing demands and, due to their incessant begging calls, vocal activity may court predators. In 6th week, they become "branchers", although still spend much of the time by the nest, especially by the edge. The young goshawks "play" by seizing and striking violent at a perch or by yanking off leaves and tossing them over their back. Wing feathers do not develop highly dimorphically, but male branchers are better developed than females who have more growing to do and can leave the nest up to 1–3 days sooner. The young rarely return to the nest after being 35 to 46 days of age and start their first flight another 10 days later, thus becoming full fledglings. Goshawk nestlings frequently engage in “runting”, wherein the older siblings push aside and call more loudly and are thus are feed more often at food deliveries, until the younger siblings may either starve to death, be trampled or killed by their siblings (referred to as siblicide or “cainism”). There is some evidence that mother goshawks may lessen the effects of runting by delaying incubation until their last eggs are laid. Food supply may be linked to higher rates of siblicides and, in many locations with consistent prey levels, runting and siblicide can occur somewhat seldomly (meaning the northern goshawk is a “facultative” rather than “obligate cainist”). Nonetheless, either by predation, starvation or siblicide, few nests produce more than 2 to 3 fledglings. One pair in North America was able to successfully fledge all four of its young. Somewhat larger numbers of female fledglings are produced in Europe with their larger size, but the opposite is true in North America where sexual dimorphism is less pronounced. When food supplies are very high, though, European goshawks actually can produce somewhat more males than females.
At about 50 days old, the young goshawks may start hunting on their own but more often eat carrion either provided by parents or biologists. Most fledglings stay within 300 m (980 ft) of the nest at 65 days of age but can wander up to 1,000 km (620 mi) before dispersal at between 65–80 days old in sync with the full development of their flight feathers. Between 65 and 90 days after hatching, more or less all young goshawks become independent. There is no evidence that parents aggressively displace the young in the fall (as other raptorial birds have sometimes been reported to do), therefore the young birds seek independence on their own. Goshawk siblings are not cohesive together past 65 days, except for some lingering young females, whereas common buzzard broods are not recorded at their nests after 65 days but remain strongly cohesive with each other. 5% of radio-tagged young in Gotland, Sweden (entirely males) were found to disperse to another breeding area and join a different brood as soon as their flight feathers were developed enough. These seem to be cases of moving to a better food area. Parents and adoptive young seem to tolerate this, although parents do not seem to be able to tell the difference between their own and other young. It is only after dispersal that goshawks typically start to hunt and seem to drink more often than older birds, sometimes spend up to an hour bathing.
Breeding success rates
Nest success averages between 80 and 95% in terms of the number of nests that produce fledglings, with an average number of 2 to 3 fledglings per nest. About equal numbers of eggs and nestlings may be lost (6% lost in each the incubation and brooding periods per a study from Arizona) but according to a study from Spain large clutches of 4 to 5 had higher losses overall than medium-sized clutches of 2 to nearly 4. Total losses averaged 36% in Spain across clutches of 2–5. Similar results were found in Germany, with similar numbers of fledglings produced in very large clutches (more than 4) as in medium-sized ones (2–4). A grading of success from a study in Sweden found categories of competent and less competent pairs, with losses averaging 7% and 17% in these two groups, respectively. Studies from Finland and the Yukon Territory found that average number of fledglings varied dramatically based on food supply based on the cyclical nature of most prey in these northern areas, varying from average success rates of 0 to 3.9 fledglings in the latter region. Similar wide variations in breeding success in correlation to prey levels were noted at other areas, including Nevada (where the number of fledglings could be up to seven times higher when lagomorphs were at their population peaks) and Wisconsin.
Poor weather, which consists of cold springs that bear late cold spells, snow, and freezing rain, causes many nests to fail, and may also hamper courtship and lower brood size and overall breeding attempts. However, the most important cause of nest failure was found to be nest destruction by humans and other predations, starvation, then bad weather and collapse of nests in declining order. On average, humans are responsible based on known studies for about 17% of nest failures in Europe. 32% of 97 nestlings in Bavaria, Germany died because of human activities, while 59% of 111 broods in England failed due to this factor. Low food supplies are linked to predation, as it seems to cause greater risk of predation due to the lower nest attendance. Lower densities of pairs may actually increase nesting success, as per studies from Finland where the highest median clutch size, at 3.8, was in the area with the lowest densities. Similarly, in Schleswig-Holstein, nest failure was 14% higher where active nests were closer than 2 km (1.2 mi) apart compared to nests farther than this. Age may also play a factor in nest success, pairings where one mate is not fully mature (usually the female, as males rarely breed before attaining adult plumage) is less than half as successful as ones where both were mature, based on studies from Arizona. Overall, males do not normally breed at any younger than 3 years of age (although they are in adult plumage by two years) and females can breed at as young as 1 to 2 years old, but rarely produce successful, viable clutches. The age at sexual maturity is the same as other northern Accipiters as well as most buteonine hawks (eagles, on the other hand, can take twice as long to attain full sexual maturity). 6–9 years of age seem to be the overall peak reproductive years for most northern goshawks. However, some females can reproduce at as old as 17 years old and senescence is ambiguous in both sexes (possibly not occurring in males). Median values of brood success was found to be 77% in Europe and 82% in North America overall. Conversely, the median brood size is about half a chick smaller in North America than in Europe. In Europe, clutch size overall averages 3.3, the number of nestlings averages 2.5 and fledglings averages 1.9.
The lifespan in the wild is variable. It is known that in captivity, northern goshawks may live up to 27 years of age. Wild birds that survive their first two years can expect a lifespan of up to 11 years. There is one record (apparently sourced to the AOU) of a 16-year, 4-month-old goshawk. In Fennoscandia, starvation was found to account for 3-6% of reported deaths. In Norway, 9% of deaths were from starvation, but the percentage of demises from this increased to the north and affected juveniles more so than adults. In Gotland, Sweden, 28% of mortality was from starvation and disease. Both bacterial and viral diseases have been known to cause mortality in wild northern goshawks. Variable numbers of goshawks are killed by flying into man-made objects such as power lines and buildings and by automobiles, although lesser numbers are affected by powerline collisions than larger types of raptor.
The breeding range of the northern goshawk extends over one-third of North America and Asia each and perhaps five-sixths of Europe, a total area of over 30,000,000 km2 (12,000,000 sq mi). Densities in western and central Europe were recorded at 3–5 pairs per 100 km2 (39 sq mi). In boreal Sweden, numbers vary from 1 to 4.5 pairs per 100 km2 (39 sq mi), while in similar habitat in Alaska there were 0.3 to 2.7/100 km2 (39 sq mi). An average of only 1 pair per 100 km2 (39 sq mi) would give world population of 600,000 breeding birds, likely at least half as many immature and other non-breeders. Recent study found 145,000–160,000 in Europe or 1 pair/60 km2 (23 sq mi) to 1 pair/54 km2 (21 sq mi). The total population of northern goshawks in the world probably ranges well over a million. The total European populations, estimated at as many as 160,000 individuals, makes it the fourth most numerous raptor in the continent, after the common buzzards (>700,000 pairs), Eurasian sparrowhawk (>340,000 pairs) and common kestrel (>330,000 pairs). The most populated countries by goshawks in Europe were Sweden (an estimated 10,000 pairs), Germany (8,500 pairs), Finland (6,000 pairs) and France (5,600 pairs). The highest densities of breeding pairs per 100 km2 (39 sq mi) of land were in The Netherlands, Latvia and Switzerland, although this is biased due to the small land area of these countries. Russia has a roughly estimated 85,000 pairs of northern goshawk. In North America, there are a broadly estimated 150,000–300,000 individuals. In North America, most western populations at mid-latitudes have approximately 3.6–10.7 pairs100 km2 (39 sq mi). A total of 107 nesting territories (1991–1996) were located on a 1,754 km2 (677 sq mi) study area on the Kaibab Plateau, AZ, resulting in a density of 8.4 pairs/100 km2 (39 sq mi). The estimated density in Pennsylvania (1.17 pairs/100 km2 (39 sq mi)) suggests that eastern populations may occur at lower densities than western populations, but densities of eastern populations may increase as these populations recover. Typically, populations at far northern latitudes may occur at lower densities than those of southwestern and western populations in North America. Although median densities was similar, populations are overall much denser in Europe than in North America. The hotspots of density for goshawks in Europe lie in east-central Europe (around Poland) and in west-central area (the Netherlands/West Germany).
Mortality rates for first-year goshawks is often considerably higher than older birds. In studies from Gotland, Sweden, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany and the Netherlands, 40–42% of first-years died. By the second year, mortality rates drop to 31–35%, based on ring studies from the Netherlands and Finland. Based on studies from Gotland, Finland and the southwestern United States, annual mortality for adults is 15–21%, however, feather results indicate that annual mortality for adult goshawks is up to 7% higher in Europe than in North America. In many parts of the range, especially Europe, historic populations decreased regionally due to human persecution (especially shooting), disturbance and epidemic loss of habitat, especially during the 19th century and early 20th. Some states, like Pennsylvania, paid $5 bounties on Goshawks in the 1930s. From 1880–1930, an estimated 3,000–5,500 goshawk were being killed annually in Norway when bounties were offered. Shooting rate lowered later, causing the average number of goshawks shot to drop to 654 to for the period 1965–1970. Northern goshawks continue to be persecuted in Norway, shown by the high turnover rate of breeding females in Telemark County, revealed by DNA analysis of moulted feathers. In Finland, where the species was not legally protected, 4,000–8,000 goshawks were being killed annually from 1964–1975. Most goshawks shot are incautious juveniles, with 58% of juvenile mortality in Germany and 59% from the Netherlands being killings by humans. Increase of pheasant releases in Vendsyssel, Denmark from 6,000 to 35,000 since 1994 has resulted in fewer goshawks as they often hunt the pheasants in winter and are shot, legally, by the region’s gamekeepers. As recently as about 5 years before that, intentional killing by humans continued as the main cause of mortality for goshawks on Gotland, Sweden, causing 36% of deaths. In the United Kingdom and Ireland, the northern goshawk was extirpated in the 19th century because of specimen collectors and persecution by gamekeepers, but in recent years it has come back by immigration from Europe, escaped falconry birds, and deliberate releases. The goshawk is now found in considerable numbers in Kielder Forest, Northumberland, which is the largest forest in Britain. Overall there are some 200 birds in Great Britain.
In the 1950s–1960s declines were increasingly linked with pesticide pollution. However, in early 1970s pesticide levels in the United States for goshawks were low. Eggshell thinning has not been a problem for most populations, although California eggshells (weight and thickness index) pre-1947 (pre-DDT) to 1947—1964 (DDT in use) declined some 8-12%. In Illinois, migratory goshawks during the winter of 1972-1973 invasion year contained less organochlorine and PCB residues than did other raptors, however, these birds were probably from nonagricultural, northern forests. Higher DDT levels seemed to have persisted quite recently in Europe. This was the case in Germany, especially in former East Germany where DDT was widely available until 1988, having been largely discontinued elsewhere after the 1970s. Goshawks, which had increased in The Netherlands after World War II due to less persecution, new woodlands and increased pigeon numbers, were found to have suddenly crashed from the late 1950s on. It was later revealed that this was due to DDT, the number of breeding pairs decreasing 84% from 1958 to 1963. As opposed to DDT, the main contaminant found to have reduced goshawks in Scandinavia during the 20th century were methyl mercury seed dressings used to reduce fungal attack in livestock.
Seemingly the remaining persistent conservation threat to goshawks, given their seeming overall resilience (at the species level) to both persecution and pesticides, is deforestation. Timber harvests are known to destroy many nests and adversely regional populations. Harvest methods that create extensive areas of reduced forest canopy cover, dropping to cover less than 35-40%, may be especially detrimental as cases of this usually cause all goshawks to disappear from the area. However, the mortality rates due to foresting practices are unknown and it is possible that some mature goshawks may simply be able to shift to other regions when a habitat becomes unsuitable but this is presumably unsustainable in the long-term. In harvest forests of California, where overstory trees are frequently removed, goshawks have been found to successfully remain as breeding species as long as some mature stands are left intact. Despite the decline of habitat quality and the frequent disturbances, this region’s goshawks breeding success rates somewhat improbably did not reduce. Similarly, a study from Italy and France shows that goshawks only left woodlots when the canopy was reduced by more than 30%, although the European goshawk populations have long been known to be adaptable to some degree of habitat fragmentation. Based on habitat usage studied in New Jersey and New York, this adaptability is not seen everywhere, as here nests were further from human habitation than expected on the basis of available habitat, an observation suggesting that disturbance regionally can reduce habitat quality. Similarly, studies from the American southwest and Canada have indicated that heavily logged areas caused strong long-term regional declines for goshawks. In Arizona, it was found that even when the nests were left intact, the noisy timber harvest work often caused failure of nesting during the incubation stage, and all nesting attempts that were occurring within 50 to 100 m (160 to 330 ft) of active logging failed, frequently after parents abandoned the nest. Other noisy activity, such as camping, have also caused nests to failure. Wildlife researchers and biologists do not seem to negatively affect goshawk nests, as they aware to keep forays to the nest brief and capture of adult goshawks for radio-tagging was found to not determent their success at raising broods.
In North America, several non-governmental conservation organizations petitioned the Department of Interior, United States Fish & Wildlife Service (1991 & 1997) to list the goshawk as "threatened" or "endangered" under the authority of the Endangered Species Act. Both petitions argued for listing primarily on the basis of historic and ongoing nesting habitat loss, specifically the loss of old-growth and mature forest stands throughout the goshawk's known range. In both instances, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service concluded that listing was not warranted, but state and federal natural resource agencies responded during the petition process with standardized and long-term goshawk inventory and monitoring efforts, especially throughout U.S. Forest Service lands in the Western U.S. The United States Forest Service (US Dept of Agriculture) has listed the goshawk as a "sensitive species", while it also benefits from various protection at the state level. In North America, the goshawk is federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 by an amendment incorporating native birds of prey into the Act in 1972. The northern goshawk is also listed in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).
Relationship with humans
The northern goshawk appears on the flag of the Azores. The archipelago of the Azores, Portugal, takes its name from the Portuguese language word for goshawk, (açor), because the explorers who discovered the archipelago thought the birds of prey they saw there were goshawks; later it was found that these birds were kites or common buzzards (Buteo buteo rothschildi). The goshawk features in Stirling Council's coat of arms via the crest of the Drummond Clan.
The name "goshawk" is a traditional name from Anglo-Saxon gōshafoc, literally "goose hawk". The name implies prowess against larger quarry such as wild geese, but were also flown against crane species and other large waterbirds. The name "goose hawk" is somewhat of a misnomer, however, as the traditional quarry for goshawks in ancient and contemporary falconry has been rabbits, pheasants, partridge, and medium-sized waterfowl, which are similar to much of the prey the species hunts in the wild. A notable exception is in records of traditional Japanese falconry, where goshawks were used more regularly on goose and crane species. In ancient European falconry literature, goshawks were often referred to as a yeoman's bird or the "cook's bird" because of their utility as a hunting partner catching edible prey, as opposed to the peregrine falcon, also a prized falconry bird, but more associated with noblemen and less adapted to a variety of hunting techniques and prey types found in wooded areas. The northern goshawk has remained equal to the peregrine falcon in its stature and popularity in modern falconry.
Goshawk hunting flights in falconry typically begin from the falconer's gloved hand, where the fleeing bird or rabbit is pursued in a horizontal chase. The goshawk's flight in pursuit of prey is characterized by an intense burst of speed often followed by a binding maneuver, where the goshawk, if the prey is a bird, inverts and seizes the prey from below. The goshawk, like other accipiters, shows a marked willingness to follow prey into thick vegetation, even pursuing prey on foot through brush. Goshawks trained for falconry not infrequently escape their handlers and, extrapolated from the present day British population which is composed mostly of escaped birds as such, have reasonably high survival rates, although many do die shortly after escape and many do not successfully breed. The effect of modern-day collection of northern goshawks for falconry purposes is unclear, unlike some falcon species which can show regional declines due to heavy falconry collections but can increase in other areas due to established escapees from falconers.
- BirdLife International (2013). "Accipiter gentilis". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
- "Astur gentilis schvedowi AVIS-IBIS".
- Brown, Leslie; Amadon, Dean (1986). Eagles, Hawks and Falcons of the World. Wellfleet. ISBN 978-1555214722.
- Jobling, James A. (2010). The Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names. London: Christopher Helm. pp. 30, 171–172. ISBN 978-1-4081-2501-4.
- Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata (in Latin). Holmiae (Stockholm): Laurentii Salvii. p. 89.
F. cera pedibusque flavis, corpore cinereo maculis fuscis cauda fasciis quatuor nigricantibus
- Ferguson-Lees, James; Christie, David A. (2001). Raptors of the World. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 0-618-12762-3.
- Squires, J.; Reynolds, R. (1997). Northern Goshawk. Birds of North America. 298. pp. 2–27.
- Kenward, Robert (2006). The Goshawk. London, UK: T & A D Poyser. p. 274. ISBN 978-0-7136-6565-9.
- Monson, G. & Phillips, A.R. (1964). A check-list of the birds of Arizona. Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press.
- Howell, S. N. G. & Webb, S. (1995). A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198540120
- Penteriani, V. (2002). Goshawk nesting habitat in Europe and North America: a review. Ornis Fennica, 79: 149-163.
- Ludwig, T. W. "Northern goshawk forest type preference in the Chippewa National Forest" (PDF). Saint Mary's University of Minnesota. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
- Austin, K. K. (1993). "Habitat use and home range size of breeding northern goshawks in the southern Cascades" (PDF). Oregon State University (Master's Thesis). Corvallis, Oregon. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
- Erickson, M. G. (1987). Nest site habitat selection of the goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) in the Black Hills of South Dakota (Doctoral dissertation, MS thesis. University of South Dakota. Brookings, South Dakota).
- Bednarek, W. (1975). Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Populationsökologie des Habichts (Accipiter gentilis): Habitatbesetzung und Bestandsregulation. Deutscher Falkenorden Jahrbuch, 1975, 47-53.
- Link, H. (1977). Beiträge zur Bestandssituation, Ökologie, Brutbiologie und Beutewahl einer nordbayerischer Population des Habichts (Accipiter gentilis). PhD thesis.
- Bull, E. L., & Hohmann, J. E. (1994). Breeding biology of northern goshawks in northeastern Oregon. Studies in Avian Biology, 16, 103-105. ISSN 0197-9922
- Squires, J. R. Ruggiero, L.F. (1995). Winter movements of adult northern goshawks that nested in southcentral Wyoming. J. Raptor Res. no. 29:5-9. ISSN 0892-1016 (print); 2162-4569 (web)
- Swem, T.; Adams, M. (1992). "A northern goshawk nest in the tundra biome". Journal of Raptor Research. 26 (2): 102–102.
- Engelmann, F. 1928. Die Raubvogel Europas: Naturgeschichte, Kulturgeschichte und Falknerei. Neudamm, Germany. ISBN 9783891046029
- Johnsgard, P. (1990). Hawks, Eagles, & Falcons of North America. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. ISBN 0874746825.
- Newton, I. (1986). The Sparrowhawk. Poyser Monographs, Calton, UK. ISBN 9781408138328
- Snyder, Noel F. R.; Snyder, Helen A. (1974). "Function of eye coloration in North American accipiters" (PDF). The Condor. 76 (2): 219–222. doi:10.2307/1366740. eISSN 1938-5129. ISSN 0010-5422. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
- "Northern Goshawk". Birds of Quebec. Retrieved 18 March 2007.
- Del Hoyo, J. E., & Elliot, A. A. & Sargatal, J.(eds.), 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 2. New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Lynx Edicions. Barcelona. ISBN 978-84-87334-15-3
- Blasco-Zumeta, J. & Henze, G.-H. 117. Goshawk. Ibercaja Aula en Red, Obra Social..
- Mueller, Helmut C.; Berger, Daniel D.; Allez, George (May 1979). "The Identification of North American Accipiters" (PDF). American Birds. 33 (3): 236–240. ISSN 0004-7686. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
- CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses, 2nd Edition by John B. Dunning Jr. (Editor). CRC Press (2008), ISBN 978-1-4200-6444-5.
- Johnson, Donald R. (December 1989). "Body size of Northern Goshawks on coastal islands of British Columbia" (PDF). Wilson Bulletin. 101 (4): 637–639. ISSN 1559-4491. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
- "Northern Goshawk – Accipiter gentilis". AVIS-IBIS: Birds of Indian Subcontinent. 4 December 2009. Retrieved 21 December 2012.
- Hoffman, Stephen W.; Smith, Jeff P.; Gessaman, James A. (Spring 1990). "Size of fall-migrant accipiters from the Goshute Mountains of Nevada" (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 61 (2): 201–211. ISSN 0273-8570. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
- Gromme, O. J. (1935). "The goshawk (Astur atricapillus atricapillus) nesting in Wisconsin" (PDF). The Auk. 52 (1): 15–20. doi:10.2307/4077102. ISSN 0004-8038. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
- Schnell, Jay H. (1958). "Nesting behavior and food habits of goshawks in the Sierra Nevada of California" (PDF). The Condor. 60 (6): 377–403. doi:10.2307/1365696. eISSN 1938-5129. ISSN 0010-5422. Retrieved 11 March 2017..
- Penteriani, Vincenzo (2001). "The annual and diel cycles of goshawk vocalizations at nest sites" (PDF). Journal of Raptor Research. 35 (1): 24–30. ISSN 0892-1016. Retrieved 12 March 2017.
- Zirrer, Francis. "The goshawk". Passenger Pigeon. IX (3): 79–94. ISSN 0031-2703. Retrieved 12 March 2017..
- Kleinschmidt, O. (1923). Berajah, Zoografia infinita. Die Realgattung Habicht, Falco columbarius (KL). Gebauer-Schwetschke, Halle, Germany.
- Wattel, Jan. "Geographical differentiation in the genus Accipiter". Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club. Cambridge, Mass. (13). ISBN 9781877973239..
- Grossman, Mary Louise; Hamlet, John (1964). Birds of Prey of the World. New York: Bonanza Books. ISBN 9780517067888.
- Brodkorb, Pierce (1964). "Catalogue of fossil birds: Part 2 (Anseriformes through Galliformes)". Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. 3 (8): 246.
- Palmer, Ralph S. (1988). Handbook of North American Birds, Vol. 4: Diurnal Raptors. Pt. 1. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300040593.
- Gladkov, N. A. (January 1941). "Taxonomy of Palaearctic goshawks". The Auk. 58 (1): 80–90. doi:10.2307/4078901. ISSN 0004-8038..
- Zuberogoitia, Iñigo; Martínez, José Enrique (2015). Salvador, A.; Morales, M. B., eds. "Azor común – Accipiter gentilis". Enciclopedia Virtual de los Vertebrados Españoles. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
- Fischer, Wolfgang (1980). Die Habichte: Accipiter. Die Neue Brehm-Bucherei. 158. Wittenberg Lutherstadt, Germany: A. Ziemsen. ISSN 0138-1423. OCLC 716324621.
- Maniarski, Roman; Ciach, Michal (October 2012). "Plumage aberration in Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis". Ardea. 100 (2): 211–213. doi:10.5253/078.100.0214. ISSN 0373-2266.
- Thibault, Jena-Claude; Patrimonio, Olivier; Torre, José (July 1992). "Does the diurnal raptor community of Corsica (Western Mediterranean) show insular characteristics?". Journal of Biogeography. 19 (4): 363–373. doi:10.2307/2845564. eISSN 1365-2699. ISSN 0305-0270.
- Wendt, Karin (8 May 2000). Topographische Anatomie der Hintergliedmaße beim Habicht (Accipiter gentilis Linne 1758) (PDF) (Dissertation) (in German). Institut für Veterinär-Anatomie, -Histologie und -Embryologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
- Shigeta, Yoshimitsu; Uchida, Hiroshi; Momose, Hiroshi (September 2006). "Measurements and identification of the Japanese Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis fujiyamae". Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology (in Japanese). 38 (1): 22–29. doi:10.3312/jyio.38.22. ISSN 1348-5032. Retrieved 15 March 2017..
- Smith, J. P., Hoffman, S. W., & Gessaman, J. A. (1990). Regional Size Differences among Fall-Migrant Accipiters in North America. Journal of Field Ornithology, 192–200.
- Whaley, W. H. & White, C.M. (1994). Trends in geographic variation of Cooper's hawk and northern goshawk in North America: a multivariate analysis. Proc. West. Found. Vertebr. Zool. no. 5:161-209.
- Henny, C. J., Olson. R.A. & Fleming, T.L. (1985). Breeding chronology, molt, and measurements of accipiter hawks in northeastern Oregon. J. Field Ornithol. no. 56: 97–112.
- Mavrogordato, J. (1973). A Hawk for the Bush: A Treatise on the Training of the Sparrow-hawk and Other Short-winged Hawks. Spearman.
- Mueller, H. C., Berger, D.D. & Allez, G. (1976). Age and sex variation in the size of goshawks. Bird-Banding no. 47 (4):310–318.
- Rashid, S. (2015). Northern Goshawk, the Grey Ghost: Habits, Habitats and Rehabilitation. Schiffer Publishing Ltd.
- Taverner, P. A. (1940). "Variation in the American goshawk". The Condor. 42 (3): 157–160. doi:10.2307/1364206.
- Iverson, G. C., Hayward, G. D., Titus, K. DeGayner, E., Lowell, R.E., Crocker-Bedford, D.C., Schempf, P.F. & Lindell, J.F. (1996). Conservation assessment for the northern goshawk in southeast Alaska. U.S. Dept., Agric., For. Serv. Publ.
- Ingraldi, M.F. (2005). A skewed sex ratio in Northern Goshawks: is it a sign of a stressed population? Journal of Raptor Research 39.3 (2005): 247–252.
- Cramp, S. and K. E. L. Simmons. (1980). Handbook of the birds of Europe and the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the western Palearctic, Vol. 2. Hawks to bustards. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN 9780198575054
- Kaufman, K. (1990). A Field Guide to advanced birding: birding challenges and how to approach them. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co. ISBN 9780395535172
- "Northern Goshawk". Hanging Rock Raptor Observatory. Retrieved 23 January 2012.
- Crossley, R. T.; Couzens, D. (2013), The Crossley ID Guide: Britain and Ireland, The Crossley ID Guides, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0691151946
- Smith, Jeff P.; Hoffman, Stephen W.; Gessaman, James A. (Spring 1990). "Regional Size Differences among Fall-Migrant Accipiters in North America" (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 61 (2): 192–200. ISSN 0273-8570. Retrieved 11 March 2017..
- Dobler, G. (1990). Brutbiotop und territorialitèt bei habicht (Accipiter gentilis) und rotmilan (Milvus milvus) [Nesting habitat and territoriality in goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) and red kite (Milvus milvus)]. J. Ornithologie no. 131:85–93.
- Schnurre, O. (1956). Ernahrungbiologische Studien au Raubvogel und Eulen dur Darbhalbinsel (Mecklenberg). Beitrage zur Vogelkunde, 19: 1–16.
- Atkinson, E. C., Goodrich, L. J., & Bildstein, K. L. (1996). Temporal field guide to autumn raptor migration at Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Birds, 10, 134–137.
- Smith, G. A. and D. G. Muir. 1980. Derby Hill spring hawk migration. Birding no. 12:224–234.
- Fransson, T., & Pettersson, J. (2001). Swedish bird ringing atlas. Swedish Museum of Natural History & Swedish Ornitological Society.
- Marcström, V., & Kenward, R. (1981). Movements of wintering goshawks in Sweden. Swedish Sportsmen's Association.
- Hoglund, N. H. 1964. The hawk Accipiter gentilis Linne in Fennos Kandia (English translation). Viltrevy no. 2:195–269.
- Keane, J. J. & Morrison, M.L. (1994). Northern Goshawk ecology: effects of scale and levels of biological organization. Stud. Avian Biol. no. 16:3-11.
- Evans, D. L. & Sindelar, C.R. (1974). First record of the goshawk for Louisiana-a collected, banded bird. Bird-Banding no. 45: 270.
- Doyle, F. I. & Smith, J.M.N. (1994). Population responses of northern goshawks to the 10-year cycle in numbers of snowshoe hares. Stud. Avian Biol. no. 16:122–129.
- Sonsthagen, S. A., Rodriguez, R., & White, C. M. (2006). Satellite telemetry of Northern Goshawks breeding in Utah-I. Annual movements. Studies in Avian Biology, 31, 239.
- Haukioja, E., & Haukioja, M. (1970). Mortality rates of Finnish and Swedish goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). Finnish Game Research, 31, 13-20.
- Mueller, H. C., D. D. Berger and G. Allez. 1977. The periodic invasions of goshawks. Auk no. 94:652-663.
- Sibley, D. A. 1997. Birds of Cape May. 2nd ed. Cape May Point: New Jersey Audubon Soc.
- Hoffman, S. W., W. R. DeRagon and J. C. Bednarz. (1992). Patterns and recent trends in counts of migrant hawks in western North America, 1977-1991. Unpubl. report.
- Wattel, J. (1973). Geographical differentiation in the genus Accipiter (No. 13). Harvard Univ Nuttall Ornithological.
- Bright-Smith, D. J.; Mannan, R.W. (1994). "Habitat use by breeding male northern goshawks in northern Arizona". Stud. Avian Biol. 16: 58–65.
- Beier, P.; Drennan, J.E. (1997). "Forest structure and prey abundance in foraging areas of northern goshawks". Ecological Applications. 7 (2): 564–571. doi:10.2307/2269521.
- Underwood, J.; White, C. M.; Rodriguez, R. (2006). "Winter movement and habitat use of northern goshawks breeding in Utah". Studies in Avian Biology. 31: 228.
- Widen, P (1989). "The hunting habitats of goshawks Accipiter gentilis in boreal forests of central Sweden". Ibis. 131 (2): 205–213. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1989.tb02763.x.
- Fox, N., & Merrick, T. (1995). Understanding the bird of prey. Hancock House Pub Limited.
- Widén, P (1984). "Activity patterns and time-budget in the goshawk Accipiter gentilis in a boreal forest area in Sweden". Ornis Fennica. 61: 109–112.
- Hantge, E (1980). "Untersuchungen uber den Jagderfolg mehrerer europaischer Greifvogel". Journal fur Ornithologie. 121: 200–207. doi:10.1007/bf01642933.
- Rutz, C (2006). "Home range size, habitat use, activity patterns and hunting behaviour of urban-breeding Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis". Ardea-Wageningen. 94 (2): 185.
- Kenward, R. E. (1982). Goshawk hunting behaviour, and range size as a function of food and habitat availability. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 69–80.
- Wittenberg, J. (1985). Habicht Accipiter gentilis jagt zu Fuß in der Stadt. Anz. orn. Ges. Bayern 24, Heft 2 (3): 180.
- Bergstrom, B. J. (1985). "Unusual prey-stalking behavior by a goshawk". J. Field Ornithol. 56: 415.
- Backstrom, P (1991). "Northern goshawk predation on sharp-tailed grouse". Loon. 63: 74.
- Westcott, P. W. (1964). "Unusual feeding behavior of a goshawk". Condor. 66: 163. doi:10.2307/1365393.
- Brace, K (1983). "Goshawk-snowshoe hare encounter". Blue Jay. 41: 120.
- Beebe, F. L. (1974). "Goshawk." In Field studies of the Falconiformes of British Columbia, 54-62. Br. Columbia Prov. Mus. Occas. Pap. Ser. no. 17.
- Kenward, R. E. (1979). "Winter predation by goshawks in lowland Britain". British Birds. 72: 64–73.
- Sæther, B. (2014). Prey handling and consumption by northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis): a feeding experiment.
- Reynolds, R. T. & Meslow, E.C. (1984). Partitioning of food and niche characteristics of coexisting Accipiter during breeding. Auk no. 101:761–779.
- Grønnesby, S., & Nygard, T. (2000). Using time-lapse video monitoring to study prey selection by breeding Goshawks Accipiter gentilis in Central Norway. Ornis Fennica, 77(3), 117-129.
- Rutz, C (2003). "Assessing the breeding season diet of goshawks Accipiter gentilis: biases of plucking analysis quantified by means of continuous radio‐monitoring". Journal of Zoology. 259 (2): 209–217. doi:10.1017/s0952836902003175.
- Simmons, R.E.; Avery, D.M.; Avery, G. (1991). "Biases in diet determined from pellets and remains: correction factors for a mammal and bird-eating raptor". Journal of Raptor Research. 25: 63–67.
- Smithers, B.L.; Boal, C.W.; Andersen, D.E. (2005). "Northern Goshawk diet in Minnesota: An analysis using video recording systems" (PDF). Journal of Raptor Research. 39 (3): 264–273.
- "Accipiter gentilis – northern goshawk". Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan.
- Lewis, Stephen B.; Titus, Kimberly; Fuller, Mark R. (2006). "Northern Goshawk Diet During the Nesting Season in Southeast Alaska" (PDF). Journal of Wildlife Management. 70 (4): 1151–1160. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1151:NGDDTN]2.0.CO;2.
- Kennedy, P. L. (2003). Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis atricapillus): A technical conservation assessment. USFS, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project. Fort Collins, Colorado.
- Bosakowski, T. (1999). The Northern Goshawk: Ecology, Behavior and Management in North America. Hancock House Pub Limited.
- Jones, S. (1979). The accipiters: goshawk, Cooper's hawk, sharp-shinned hawk (No. 17). US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.
- García-Salgado, G.; Rebollo, S.; Pérez-Camacho, L.; Martínez-Hesterkamp, S.; Navarro, A.; Fernández-Pereira, J. M. (2015). "Evaluation of trail-cameras for analyzing the diet of nesting raptors using the Northern Goshawk as a model". PLoS ONE. 10 (5): e0127585. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127585.
- Zawadzka, D., & Zawadzki, J. (1998). The Goshawk Accipiter gentilis in Wigry National Park (NE Poland)-numbers, breeding results, diet composition and prey selection. Acta ornithologica, 33(3-4), 181-190.
- Boal, C. W., & Mannan, R. W. (1996). Prey sizes of male and female northern goshawks. The Southwestern Naturalist, 355–358.
- Tornberg, R. (1997). Prey selection of the goshawk Accipiter gentilis during the breeding season: the role of prey profitability and vulnerability. Ornis Fennica, 74(1), 15–28.
- Nielsen, J. T., & Drachmann, J. (1999). Prey selection of Goshawks Accipiter gentilis during the breeding season in Vendsyssel, Denmark. Dansk Orn Foren Tidsskr, 93, 85–90.
- Penteriani, V (1997). "Long-term study of a Goshawk breeding population on a Mediterranean mountain (Abruzzi Apennines, Central, Italy): density, breeding performance and diet". Journal of Raptor Research. 31: 308–312.
- Boal, C. W., & Mannan, R. W. (1994). Northern goshawk diets in ponderosa pine forests on the Kaibab Plateau. Studies in Avian Biology, 16, 97-102.
- Rutz, C. (2004). Breeding season diet of Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis in the city of Hamburg, Germany. Corax, 19, 311–322.
- Verdal, T., & Selås, V. (2010). A comparison of Goshawk summer diet in three areas with different breeding density in western Norway. Ornis Norvegica, 33, 110–117.
- Sulkava, S. (1964). Zur Nahrungbiologies des Habichts, Accipiter gentilis L. Aquilo Seria Zoologica, 3: 1–103.
- Karyakin, I. (2009). Goshawk in the Urals and adjacent territories. Raptor Conservation, A (4).
- Araujo, J. (1974). Falconiformes del Guadarrama suroccidental. Ardeola, 19(2), 257–278.
- Zuban, I.A. (2012). Goshawk Accipiter gentilis in Zhambyl district of North Kazakhstan. Russian Ornithological Journal, 749 (21): 885–890.
- Meng, H. (1959). Food habits of nesting Cooper's Hawks and Goshawks in New York and Pennsylvania. The Wilson Bulletin, 71(2), 169–174.
- Ellenberg, H. & Dreifke, R. (1993). “Abrition”– Der Kolrabe als Schutzchild vor dem Habicht. Corax, 15: 2–10.
- Watson, J. W.; Hays, D. W.; Finn, S. P.; Meehan-Martin, P. (1998). "Prey of breeding northern goshawks in Washington". Journal of Raptor Research. 32 (4): 297–305.
- Skilsky, I.V.; Meleshchuk, L.I. (2007). "Diet of the Goshawk in the southern part of the Ukraine". Berkut. 16 (1): 159–161.
- Petronilho, J.; Vingada, J. V. (2002). "First data on feeding ecology of Goshawk Accipiter gentilis during the breeding season in the natura 2000 site Dunas de Mira, Gândara e Gafanhas (Beira Litoral, Portugal)". Airo. 12: 11–16.
- Abuladze, A. (2013). Birds of Prey of Georgia. Materials towards Fauna of Georgia, Issue VI, Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University.
- Opdam, P. F. M. (1980). Feeding ecology and niche `1qdifferentiation in goshawk (Accipiter gentilis L.) and sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus L.) (Doctoral dissertation, [Sl]: PFM Opdam).
- Toyne, E. P. (1998). "Breeding season diet of the Goshawk Accipiter gentilis in Wales". Ibis. 140 (4): 569–579. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1998.tb04701.x.
- Brüll, H. (1964). Das Leben deutscher Greifvögel. Fischer, Sttugart, Germany.
- Pielowski, Z (1961). "Uber den Unifikationseinfluss der selektiven Narhungswahl des Habichts, Accipiter gentilis L., auf Haustauben". Ekologa Polska. 9: 183–194.
- Rutz, C (2012). "Predator fitness increases with selectivity for odd prey". Current Biology. 22 (9): 820–824. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.028.
- Takagi, M.; Ueta, M.; Ikeda, S. (1995). "Accipiters prey on nestling birds in Japan". Journal of Raptor Research. 29: 267–268.
- Bosakowski, T.; Smith, D. G. (2006). "Ecology of the Northern Goshawk in the New York-New Jersey highlands". Studies in Avian Biology. 31: 109.
- Becker, T. E.; Smith, D. G.; Bosakowski, T. (2006). "Habitat, food habits, and productivity of northern goshawks nesting in Connecticut". Studies in Avian Biology. 31: 119–125.
- Widen, P. (1987). Goshawk predation during winter, spring and summer in a boreal forest area in Sweden. Ornis Fennica, 61: 109-112.
- Linden, H., & Wikman, M. (1983). Goshawk predation on tetraonids: availability of prey and diet of the predator in the breeding season. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 953-968.
- Tornberg, R., Korpimaki, E., & Byholm, P. (2006). Ecology of the northern goshawk in Fennoscandia. Studies in Avian Biology, 31, 141–157.
- Tornberg, R (2001). "Pattern of goshawk Accipiter gentilis predation on four forest grouse species in northern Finland". Wildlife Biology. 7 (4): 245–256.
- Lewis, S. B.; Fuller, M. R.; Titus, K. (2004). "A comparison of 3 methods for assessing raptor diet during the breeding season". Wildlife Society Bulletin. 32 (2): 373–385. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[373:acomfa]2.0.co;2.
- Marcstrom, V. & Widen, P. (1977). Hur skulle det ga for duvhoken om inte Fasan fanns? Svensk Jakt, 115: 98–101.
- Badarch, D., Zilinskas, R. A., & Balint, P. J. (2003). Mongolia today: science, culture, environment and development (Vol. 1). Psychology Press.
- Golet, G. H.; Golet, H. T.; Colton, A. M. (2003). "Immature Northern Goshawk captures, kills, and feeds on adult-sized wild turkey". Journal of Raptor Research. 37 (4): 337–340.
- Mañosa, S (1994). "Goshawk diet in a Mediterranean area of northeastern Spain". Journal of Raptor Research. 28 (2): 84–92.
- Slisky, I.V. & Meleshchuk, L.I. (2007). Diet of the goshawk in southern part of western Ukraine. Berkut, 16 (1): 159–161.
- Ivanovsky, V. V. (1998). Current status and breeding ecology of the Goshawk Accipiter gentilis in northern Belarus. Holarctic Birds of Prey, ADENEXWWGBP, Calamonte, Spain, 111–115.
- Marquiss, M., & Newton, I. (1982). The goshawk in Britain. British Birds, 75, 243–260.
- Grzybowski, J. A., & Eaton, S. W. (1976). Prey items of goshawks in southwestern New York. The Wilson Bulletin, 88(4), 669–670.
- Graham, R. T., de Volo, S. B., & Reynolds, R. T. (2015). Northern goshawk and its prey in the Black Hills: Habitat assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-339. Fort Collins, CO: US, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
- The Shipley Group (2009). Goshawk Survey; Soule River Watershed, Southeast Alaska. Alaska Power & Telephone Survey.
- Schaffer, W. W. 1998. Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) habitat characterization in central Alberta. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
- McComb, A. M. (2004). Raptor Predation Attempts on Grey Squirrels Sciurus carolinensis (Gmelin). The Irish Naturalists' Journal, 27(12), 483–484.
- Wauters, L. A.; Dhondt, A. A. (1989). "Variation in length and body weight of the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in two different habitats". Journal of Zoology. 217 (1): 93–106. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02477.x.
- Gompper, M. E. (1999). "Predation in Vertebrate Communities: The Białowieża Primeval Forest as a Case Study". Ecology. 80 (7): 2450–1. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2450:PPDAAE]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 176929.
- Tomešek, M.; Čermák, P. (2014). "Distribution and biology of goshawk (Accipiter gentilis L.) in the Chřiby Upland, the Czech Republic". Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 57 (1): 153–164.
- Vaidie, F. (1999). L’Autour des palombes (Accipiter gentilis) en Sarthe.
- Steele, M. A. (1998). Tamiasciurus hudsonicus. Mammalian Species Archive, 586, 1–9.
- Squires, J. R. (2000). "Food habits of northern goshawks nesting in south central Wyoming". The Wilson Bulletin. 112 (4): 536–539. doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0536:fhongn]2.0.co;2.
- Clough, L. T. (2000). Nesting habitat selection and productivity of northern goshawks in west-central Montana. University of Montana.
- Carey, A. B. (1995). "Sciurids in Pacific Northwest Managed and Old‐Growth Forests". Ecological Applications. 5 (3): 648–661. doi:10.2307/1941974.
- Promessi, R. L., Matson, J. O., & Flores, M. (2004). Diets of nesting northern goshawks in the Warner Mountains, California. Western North American Naturalist, 359–363.
- Keane, J. J.; Morrison, M. L.; Fry, D. M. (2006). "Prey and weather factors associated with temporal variation in northern goshawk reproduction in the Sierra Nevada, California". Studies in Avian Biology. 31: 87.
- Lorenzini, A.; Tresini, M.; Austad, S. N.; Cristofalo, V. J. (2005). "Cellular replicative capacity correlates primarily with species body mass not longevity". Mechanisms of ageing and development. 126 (10): 1130–1133. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2005.05.004.
- Drennan, J. E. (2006). "Northern goshawk food habits and goshawk prey species habitats". Studies in Avian Biology. 31: 198–227.
- Storer, R. W. (1966). "Sexual dimorphism and food habits in three North American accipiters". The Auk. 83 (3): 423–436. doi:10.2307/4083053.
- Kenagy, G. J.; Trombulak, S. C. (1986). "Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size". Journal of Mammalogy. 67 (1): 1–22. doi:10.2307/1380997.
- Rogers, A. S.; DeStefano, S.; Ingraldi, M. F. (2006). "Diet, prey delivery rates, and prey biomass of northern goshawks in east-central Arizona". Studies in Avian Biology. 31: 219.
- Jenkins, S. H., & Eshelman, B. D. (1984). Spermophilus beldingi. Mammalian Species Archive, 221, 1–8.
- Miller, R. A.; Carlisle, J. D.; Bechard, M. J. (2014). "Effects of prey abundance on breeding season diet of Northern Goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) within an unusual prey landscape". Journal of Raptor Research. 48 (1): 1–12. doi:10.3356/0892-1016-48.1.1.
- Feldhamer, G. A., Thompson, B. C., & Chapman, J. A. (2003). Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. JHU Press.
- Slobodchikoff, C., B. Perla, J. Verdolin. 2009. Prairie Dogs: Communication and Community in an Animal Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Perrone, A., Macchi, E., & Durio, P. (1992). Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) predation on marmot (Marmota marmota). In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Alpine Marmot (Marmota marmota) and on genus Marmota (pp. 239–240).
- Van Vuren, D. H. (2001). "Predation on yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris)". The American Midland Naturalist. 145 (1): 94–100. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0094:poybmm]2.0.co;2.
- White, C. R.; Seymour, R. S. (2003). "Mammalian basal metabolic rate is proportional to body mass2/3". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100 (7): 4046–4049. doi:10.1073/pnas.0436428100. PMC .
- Reynolds, R. T., Graham, R. T., & Boyce, D. A. (2006). An ecosystem-based conservation strategy for the northern goshawk. Studies in Avian Biology, 31, 299-311.
- Verts, B. J., & Carraway, L. N. (2001). Tamias minimus. Mammalian Species, 1-10.
- Pfeiffer W. (1978). [On the capture of a hare (Lepus europaeus) by a Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis)]. Aves 15: 31–33.
- Lim, B. K. (1987). Lepus townsendii. Mammalian Species Archive, 288, 1-6.
- Best, T. L. (1996). Lepus californicus. Mammalian Species Archive, 530, 1–10.
- Chapman, J. A., & Flux, J. E. (1990). Rabbits, hares and pikas: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN.
- Kenward, R. E.; Marcstrom, V.; Karlbom, M. (1981). "Goshawk winter ecology in Swedish pheasant habitats". J. Wildl. Manage. 45: 397–408. doi:10.2307/3807921.
- Tornberg, R.; Mönkkönen, M.; Pahkala, M. (1999). "Changes in diet and morphology of Finnish goshawks from 1960s to 1990s". Oecologia. 121 (3): 369–376. doi:10.1007/s004420050941.
- Bleisch, W. (2011). Asian Highlands Perspectives 18: Environmental Issues Facing Tibetan Pastoral Communities (Vol. 31). ASIAN HIGHLANDS PERSPECTIVES.
- Smith, A. T.; Foggin, J. M. (1999). "The plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) is a keystone species for biodiversity on the Tibetan plateau". Animal Conservation. 2 (4): 235–240. doi:10.1017/s1367943099000566.
- Schreven, K. Een luchtbukskogeltje in een braakbal van een Havik Accipiter gentilis, in de context van jacht en loodvergifti-ging. De Takkeling, 225–229.
- Kennedy, P. L. (1989). The nesting ecology of Cooper's hawks and northern goshawks in the Jemez Mountains, NM: a summary of results, 1984-1988 (Final Report). Santa Fe National Forest: U.S.D.A. Forest Service.
- Bacon, B.R. (1983). "Goshawk and Red Fox predate Wood Ducks in trap". Passenger Pigeon. 45: 129.
- Lever, C. (2013). The mandarin duck. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Veldkamp R. (2008). [Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo and other large bird species as prey of goshawks Accipiter gentilis in De Wieden]. De Takkeling 16: 85–91.
- Madsen, J. (1988). Goshawk, Accipiter gentilis, harassing and killing brent geese Branta bernicla. Meddelelse fra Vildtbiologisk Station (Denmark).
- Castelijns, H (2010). "Goshawk Accipiter gentilis catches Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis". De Takkeling. 18: 197.
- Møller, A. P., Solonen, T., Byholm, P., Huhta, E., Tøttrup Nielsen, J. and Tornberg, R. 2012. Spatial consistency in susceptibility of prey species to predation by two Accipiter hawks. J. Avian Biol. 43.
- Møller, A. P., Erritzøe, J., & Tøttrup Nielsen, J. (2010). Predators and microorganisms of prey: goshawks prefer prey with small uropygial glands. Functional ecology, 24(3), 608–613.
- Eriksson, M. O. G.; Blomqvist, D.; Hake, M.; Johansson, O. C. (1990). "Parental feeding in the Red-throated Diver Gavia stellata". Ibis. 132: 1–13.
- Kis, B (1999). "[Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) robbing a Black Stork (Ciconia nigra) nest]". Tuzo. 4: 87–88.
- Belika, V.P. (2003). "The Goshawk: Place in Russian ecosystems. Materials to the IV Conference on Raptors of Northern Eurasia". Penza. 176: 5–173.
- Camphuysen, C. J. (2015). "De Havik Accipiter gentilis als meeuwenpredator op Texel". De takkeling. 23 (1): 79–85.
- Kranenbarg, S (1997). "[Inland-strayed Long-tailed Skua Stercorarius longicaudus victim of Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis]". Limosa. 70: 76–77.
- Nethersole-Thompson, D. (2010). Waders: their breeding, haunts and watchers. A&C Black.
- Sonerud, G. A.; Steen, R.; Selås, V.; Aanonsen, O. M.; Aasen, G. H.; Fagerland, K. L.; Fossa, A.; Kristiansen, L.; Low, L.M.; Ronning, M.E.; Skouen, S.K.; Asakskogen, E.; Johansen, H.M.; Johnsen, J.T.; Karlsen, L.T.; Nyhus, G.C.; Roed, L.T.; Skar, K.; Sveen, B.-A.; Tvelten, R.; Slagsvold, T. (2014). "Evolution of parental roles in provisioning birds: diet determines role asymmetry in raptors". Behavioral Ecology. 25 (4): 762–772. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru053.
- Bezzel, E.; Rust, R.; Kechele, W. (1997). "Nahrungswahl südbayerischer Habichte Accipiter gentilis während der Brutzeit". Ornithologischer Anzeiger. 36: 19–30.
- Roberson, A. M., Anderson, D. E., & Kennedy, P. L. (2003). The northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis atricapillus) in the western Great Lakes Region: a technical conservation assessment. Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Minnesota.
- Kirby, R. E.; Fuller, M. R. (1978). "Observations and reinterpretation of Kingfisher-raptor interactions". Auk. 95 (3): 598–599.
- Wells-Gosling, N. & Heaney, L.R. 1984. Glaucomys sabrinus. Mammalian Species No. 229. American Society of Mammalogists.
- Balčiauskienė, L., & Balčiauskas, L. (2009). Prediction of the body mass of the bank vole Myodes glareolus from skull measurements. Estonian J. Ecol, 58, 77-85.
- Gryz, J., & Krauze-Gryz, D. (2014). The influence of raptors (Falconiformes) and ravens (Corvus corax) on populations of game animals. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW. Forestry and Wood Technology, 114–125.
- Reich, L. M. (1981). Microtus pennsylvanicus. Mammalian species, (159), 1-8.
- Morand, S.; Poulin, R. (1998). "Density, body mass and parasite species richness of terrestrial mammals". Evolutionary Ecology. 12 (6): 717–727. doi:10.1023/a:1006537600093.
- Begall, S., Burda, H., & Schleich, C. E. (2007). Subterranean rodents: news from underground. In Subterranean Rodents (pp. 3-9). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Adamian, M. S., & Klem, D. (1999). Handbook of the Birds of Armenia. American University of Armenia.
- Thrailkill, J. A.; Andrews, L. S.; Claremont, R. M. (2000). "Diet of breeding northern goshawks in the Coast Range of Oregon". Journal of Raptor Research. 34 (4): 339–340.
- Curnutt, J. (2007). Conservation Assessment for Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) Linnaeus in the Western Great Lakes.
- Sherrod, S. K. (1978). Diets of North American Falconiformes. Raptor Res, 12(3/4), 49–121.
- Mikula, P.; Morelli, F.; Lučan, R. K.; Jones, D. N.; Tryjanowski, P. (2016). "Bats as prey of diurnal birds: a global perspective". Mammal Review. doi:10.1111/mam.12060.
- Zhang, S.; Ren, B.; Li, B. (1999). "A juvenile Sichuan golden monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) predated by a goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) in the Qinling Mountains". Folia Primatologica. 70 (3): 175–176. doi:10.1159/000021693.
- Ahmadzadeh, F., Carretero, M. A., Mebert, K., Faghiri, A., Ataei, S., Hamidi, S., & Böhm, W. (2011). Preliminary results on biological aspects of the grass snake, Natrix natrix in the southern coastal area of the Caspian Sea. Acta Herpetologica, 6(2), 209–221.
- Klein, W.; Reuter, C.; Böhme, W.; Perry, S. F. (2005). "Lungs and mesopneumonia of scincomorph lizards (Reptilia: Squamata)". Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 5 (1): 47–57. doi:10.1016/j.ode.2004.06.004.
- Thiollay, J. M. (1967). Ecologie d’une population de rapaces diurnes en Lorraine. 116–183.
- Young, O. P. (2015). Predation on dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): a literature review. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 111–155.
- Marti, C. D., Korpimäki, E., & Jaksić, F. M. (1993). Trophic structure of raptor communities: a three-continent comparison and synthesis. In Current ornithology (pp. 47–137). Springer US.
- Bosakowski, T.; Smith, D. G. (1992). "Comparative diets of sympatric nesting raptors in the eastern deciduous forest biome". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 70 (5): 984–992. doi:10.1139/z92-140.
- Steenhof, K.; Kochert, M. N. (1985). "Dietary shifts of sympatric buteos during a prey decline". Oecologia. 66 (1): 6–16. Bibcode:1985Oecol..66....6S. doi:10.1007/bf00378546.
- Krebs, C. J.; Boutin, S.; Boonstra, R.; Sinclair, A. R. E. (1995). "Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle". Science. 269 (5227): 1112. doi:10.1126/science.269.5227.1112.
- Hik, D. S. (1995). "Does risk of predation influence population dynamics? Evidence from cyclic decline of snowshoe hares". Wildlife Research. 22 (1): 115–129. doi:10.1071/wr9950115.
- Jaksic, F. M.; Soriguer, R. C. (1981). "Predation upon the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in Mediterranean habitats of Chile and Spain: a comparative analysis". The Journal of Animal Ecology. 50: 269–281. doi:10.2307/4044.
- Serrano, D (2000). "Relationship between raptors and rabbits in the diet of Eagle Owls in southwestern Europe: competition removal or food stress?". Journal of Raptor Research. 34 (4): 305–310.
- Gatto, A. E., Grubb, T. G., & Chambers, C. L. (2006). Red-tailed hawk dietary overlap with northern goshawks on the Kaibab Plateau, Arizona. J. Raptor Res., 39: 439-444.
- La Sorte, F. A.; Mannan, R. W.; Reynolds, R. T.; Grubb, T. G. (2004). "Habitat associations of sympatric red-tailed hawks and northern goshawks on the Kaibab Plateau". Journal of Wildlife Management. 68 (2): 307–317. doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0307:haosrh]2.0.co;2.
- Preston, C. R. (2000). Red-tailed hawk. Stackpole Books.
- Ponitz I. 1992. [White-tailed Eagle and Western Marsh Harrier steal prey from Northern Goshawk!] Falke 39. p. 209.
- Moshkin, A. (2009). Kleptoparasitism-One of Hunting Technique of the Peregrine Falcon that Became Common under Condition of the Increase in its Number in the Southern Ural Mountains, Russia. Raptors Conservation, 18 (17): 93–97.
- Karlsen, Rune Sveinsgjerd. "Den tøffe måka og hauken" [The tough gull and the hawk] (in Norwegian). Natur i Bilder. Retrieved 28 June 2013.
- Kenward, R. E. (1996). Goshawk Adaptation to Deforestation: Does Europe Differ From North. Raptors in Human Landscapes: Adaptation to Built and Cultivated Environments, 233.
- Reynolds, R. T., & Wight, H. M. (1978). Distribution, density, and productivity of accipiter hawks breeding in Oregon. The Wilson Bulletin, 182–196.
- Looft, V. & Biesterfeld, G. (1981). Habicht – Accipiter gentilis. In: Looft, V. & G. Busche (Hrsg.). Vogelwelt Schleswig-Holsteins. Greifvögel. Wachholtz, Neumünster.
- Kostrzewa, A. (1991). Interspecific interference competition in three European raptor species. Ethology, Ecology, and Evolution, 3: 127–143.
- Krüger, O (2002). "Interactions between common buzzard Buteo buteo and goshawk Accipiter gentilis: trade‐offs revealed by a field experiment". Oikos. 96 (3): 441–452. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960306.x.
- Goslow, G. E. (1971). The attack and strike of some North American raptors. The Auk, 815-827.
- Sprunt, A., & May, J. B. (1955). North American birds of prey. Published under the sponsorship of the National Aububon Society by Harper.
- Woodbridge, B.; Detrich, P.J. (1994). "Territory occupancy and habitat patch size of northern goshawks in the southern Cascades of California". Studies in Avian Biology. 16: 83–87.
- Sergio, F., & Hiraldo, F. (2008). Intraguild predation in raptor assemblages: a review. Ibis, 150(s1), 132–145.
- Lourenço, R., Santos, S. M., Rabaça, J. E., & Penteriani, V. (2011). Superpredation patterns in four large European raptors. Population Ecology, 53(1), 175–185.
- Petty, S. J.; Anderson, D. I. K.; Davison, M.; Little, B.; Sherratt, T. N.; Thomas, C. J.; Lambin, X. (2003). "The decline of common kestrels Falco tinnunculus in a forested area of northern England: the role of predation by northern goshawks Accipiter gentilis". Ibis. 145 (3): 472–483. doi:10.1046/j.1474-919x.2003.00191.x.
- Bijlsma, R.G. (2004). Wat is het predatiersico voor Wespendieven Pernis apivorus in de Nederlands bossen bij een afnemend voedselaanbod voor Haviken Accipiter gentilis. De Takkeling, 12: 185–197.
- Iwami, Y (1996). "Some Prey Items of Three Species of Hawks (Goshawk Accipiter gentilis, Sparrowhawks A, nisus and Buzzard Buteo buteo) in Tokachi District, Eastern Hokkaido". Japanese Journal of Ornithology. 45 (1): 37–38. doi:10.3838/jjo.45.37.
- Snow, D. & Perrins, C. 1998. The Birds of the Western Palearctic Concise Edition. Oxford Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press.
- Reynolds, R. T., Joy, S.M. & Leslie, D.G. (1994). Nest productivity, fidelity, and spacing of northern goshawks in northern Arizona. Stud. Avian Biol. no. 16:106–113.
- Kitowski, I. (2002). Present status and conservation problems of Montagu’s Harrier Circus pygargus in Southeast Poland. Ornithol. Anz, 41, 167–174.
- Crocoll, S. T. (1984). Breeding biology of broad-winged and red-shouldered hawks in western New York (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Fredonia, 1984--Department of Biology.)
- Rosendaal, C. W. C. (1990). Voedselonderzoek 1984-1988 Haviken in Zuid-Twente I. Het vogeljaar, 38(5), 198-207.
- János, B. & László, H. (1994). Data on other raptors as prey animals of Goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). Aquila, 101: 89-92.
- Crannell, D.; DeStefano, S. (1992). "An aggressive interaction between a northern goshawk and a red-tailed hawk". Journal of Raptor Research. 26 (4): 269–270.
- Bai, M. L.; Schmidt, D.; Gottschalk, E.; Mühlenberg, M. (2009). "Distribution pattern of an expanding Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) population in a changing environment". Journal of Ornithology. 150 (1): 255–263. doi:10.1007/s10336-008-0345-3.
- Finlayson, C. (2011). Avian Survivors: the history and biogeography of Palearctic birds (Vol. 16). A&C Black.
- Mikkola, H. (1976). Owls killing and killed by other owls and raptors in Europe. British Birds, 69, 144–154.
- Duncan, J. R. (1997). Great gray owls (Strix nebulosa nebulosa) and forest. J Raptor Res, 31(2), 160-166.
- Rajkovic, D. 2005. [Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis preys on chicks of the Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus and Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus]. Ciconia 14:115-116.
- Hogan, C. Michael, ed. (2010). "American Kestrel". Encyclopedia of Earth. Cleveland: U.S. National Council for Science and the Environment.
- Noskovič, J.; Rakovská, A.; Porhajasova; Babosova, M. (2016). "Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug, Gray) and its relation to agricultural land Slovakia". Research Journal of Agricultural Science. 48 (1): 106–113.
- Stewart, B.S. & DeLong, R.L. (1984). Black-shoulder kite and northern goshawk interactions with peregrine falcons at San Miguel Island, California. Western Birds 15:187–188,
- Nowak, R. M. (1999). Walker's Mammals of the World (Vol. 1). JHU Press.
- Sheffield, S. R., & King, C. M. (1994). Mustela nivalis. Mammalian Species Archive, 454, 1-10.
- Mammals of the Soviet Union Vol. II Part 1a, SIRENIA AND CARNIVORA (Sea cows; Wolves and Bears), V.G. Heptner and N.P. Naumov editors, Science Publishers, Inc. USA. 1998. ISBN 1-886106-81-9
- Choate, J. R., Wilson, D. E., & Ruff, S. (2001). The Smithsonian book of North American mammals.
- Ward, O. G., & Wurster-Hill, D. H. (1990). Nyctereutes procyonoides. Mammalian Species Archive, 358, 1–5.
- Selås, V.; Steel, C. (1998). "Large brood sizes of pied flycatcher, sparrowhawk and goshawk in peak microtine years: support for the mast depression hypothesis". Oecologia. 116 (4): 449–455. doi:10.1007/s004420050609.
- Selås, V (1998). "Does food competition from red fox (Vulpes vulpes) influence the breeding density of goshawk (Accipiter gentilis)? Evidence from a natural experiment". Journal of Zoology. 246 (03): 325–335. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00162.x.
- Ziesemer, F. (1981). Methods of assessing goshawk predation. Understanding the goshawk, 144-150.
- Ward, J. M., & Kennedy, P. L. (1996). Effects of supplemental food on size and survival of juvenile Northern Goshawks. The Auk, 200–208.
- Boal, C. W., Andersen, D. E., Kennedy, P. L., & Roberson, A. M. (2006). Northern Goshawk ecology in the western Great Lakes region. Studies in Avian Biology, 31, 126.
- Rohner, C. and F. I. Doyle. 1992. Food-stressed Great Horned Owl kills adult goshawk: exceptional observation or community process? Journal of Raptor Research, 26:261–263.
- Busche, G, Raddatz, H.-J. & Kostrzewa, A. (2004). Nisplatz-Konkurrenz under Pradation zwischen Uhu (Bubo bubo) und Habicht (Accipiter gentilis): erst Ergebnisse aus Norddeustchland. Vogelwarte, 42: 169-177.
- Boal, C. W. (2005). Productivity and mortality of northern goshawks in Minnesota. J. Raptor Res, 39(3), 222-228.
- Luttich, S.; Rusch, D. H.; Meslow, E. C.; Keith, L. B. (1970). "Ecology of Red‐Tailed Hawk Predation in Alberta". Ecology. 51 (2): 190–203. doi:10.2307/1933655.
- Voous, K. H., & Ad, C. (1989). Owls of the northern hemisphere. MIT Press.
- Paragi, T. G. and G. M. Wholecheese. 1994. Marten, Martes americana, predation on a northern goshawk, Accipiter gentilis. Can. Field-Nat. no. 108:81-82.
- Holyan, J. A., Jones, L. L., & Raphael, M. G. (1998). American Marten Use of Cabins as Resting Sites in Central Oregon. Northwestern Naturalist, 68-70.
- Boal, Clint W.; Andersen, David E.; Kennedy, Patricia L.; Roberson, Aimee M. 2006. Northern goshawk ecology in the western Great Lakes region. Studies in Avian Biology 31: 126-134.
- Aubry, K. B., & Raley, C. M. (2006). Ecological characteristics of fishers (Martes pennanti) in the southern Oregon Cascade range . USDA Forest Service—Pacific Northwest Research Station. Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Olympia, WA,
- Link, H. (1986). Untersuchungen am Habicht (Accipiter gentilis). PhD thesis, Friedrich-Alexander Universitat, Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany.
- Doyle, F. I. 1995. Bald Eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus, and Northern Goshawk, Accipiter gentilis, nests apparently preyed upon by a wolverine(s), Gulo gulo, in the southwestern Yukon Territory. Can. Field-Nat. no. 109:115-116.
- McGowan, J. D. 1975. Distribution, density and productivity of goshawks in interior Alaska. Alaska Dep. of Fish and Game: Fed. Aid Wildl. Restor.
- Reynolds, Richard T.; Graham, Russel T.; Reiser, M. Hildegard; Bassett, Richard L.; Kennedy, Patricia L.; Boyce, Douglas A., Jr.; Goodwin, Greg; Smith, Randall; Fisher, E. Leon. 1992. Management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-217. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 90 p
- Novy, S (2014). "Looking for the Goshawk". The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 126 (1): 171–172.
- Savinich IB. 1999. [Killing of the goshawk Accipiter gentilis by Hooded Crows Corvus cornix]. Russkiy Ornitologicheskiy Zhurnal 69: 8-9.
- Monke; Scvhmal R; Wader. 2002. [Goshawk drowns while trying to capture a Tufted Duck]. Ornithologische Mitteilungen 54: 381-383
- Lee, J. A. 1981. Comparative breeding behavior of the goshawk and Cooper's hawk. Master's Thesis, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT.
- Suklava, P. & Suklava, S. (1981). Petolintujen syksyiesta pesarakentamista. Lintumies, 16: 77–80.
- Sulkava, S., Huhtala, K., & Tornberg, R. (1994). Regulation of Goshawk Accipiter gentilis breeding in Western Finland over the last 30 years. Raptor conservation today, 67–76.
- Demandt, C. (1927). Beobachtungen am Habichtshorst. Beitrage zur Fortpflanzung der Vogel, 3: 134–136.
- Demandt, C. (1933). Neue Beobachtungen uber die Flugspiele des Habichts (Accipiter gentilis). Beitrage zur Fortpflanzung der Vogel, 9: 172-175.
- Møller, A. P. (1987). Copulation behaviour in the goshawk Accipiter gentilis. Anim. Behav. no. 35:755–763.
- Gavin, T. A., R. T. Reynolds, S. M. Joy, D. G. Leslie and B. May. (1998). Genetic evidence for low frequency of extra-pair fertilizations in Northern Goshawk. Condor no. 100 (3):556-560.
- Detrich, P. J. and B. Woodbridge. 1994. Territory fidelity, mate fidelity, and movements of color-marked northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) in the southern Cascades of California. Stud. Avian Biol. no. 16:130-132.
- Rutz, C (2005). "Extra‐pair copulation and intraspecific nest intrusions in the Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis". Ibis. 147 (4): 831–835. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00453.x.
- Kollinger, D. (1964). Weitere Beobachtungen zur Biologie des Habichts. Deutscher Falkenorden: 9-18.
- Holstein, V. (1942). Duehøgen Astur gentilis dubius (Sparrman). Hirschprung, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Speiser, R. and T. Bosakowski. 1991. Nesting phenology, site fidelity, and defense behavior of northern goshawks in New York and New Jersey. J. Raptor Res. no. 25:132-135.
- Younk, J. V. and M. J. Bechard. 1994. Breeding ecology of the northern goshawk in high-elevation aspen forest of northern Nevada. Stud. Avian Biol. no. 16:119–121.
- Kennedy, P. L. (1988). Habitat characteristics of Cooper's hawks and northern goshawks nesting in New Mexico. In Proceedings of the southwest raptor management symposium and workshop. Natl. Wildl. Fed. Sci. Tech. Ser (No. 11).
- Bent, A. C. (1938). Life histories of North American birds of prey: order Falconiformes (No. 170). US Government Printing Office.
- Krechmar, A.V. & Probst, R. (2003). Der weisse Habicht Accipitergentilis albidus in Nordost-Sibirien – Portrat eines Mythos. Limicola, 17: 289–305.
- Porter, T. W., & Wilcox Jr, H. H. (1941). Goshawk nesting in Michigan. The Wilson Bulletin, 43-44.
- Selas, V (1997). "Nest-site selection by four sympatric forest raptors in southern Norway". Journal of Raptor Research. 31: 16–25.
- Crocker-Bedford, D. C., & Chaney, B. (1988). Characteristics of goshawk nesting stands. In Proceedings of the Southwest raptor management symposium and workshop. Nat. Wildl. Fed. Sci. Tech. Ser (No. 11, pp. 210–217).
- Bijlsma, R.G. (1993). Ecologische atlas van de Nederlandse roofvogels. Haarlem, Schuyt & Co.
- Schioler, E.L. (1931). Danmarks Fugle III, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Woodbridge, B.; Detrich, P. J. (1994). "Territory occupancy and habitat patch size of northern goshawks in the southern Cascades of California". Studies in Avian Biology. 16: 83–87.
- Pielowski, Z. (1968). Studien uber die Bestandsverhaltnissen einer Habichtspopulation in Zentralpolen. Beitrage zur angewadten Vogelkunde, 5: 125-136.
- Ortlieb, R (1978). "Pestizidschadungen auch beuim Habicht". Falke. 25: 78–87.
- Petty, S. J.; Anderson, D. I. K. (1989). "Egg measurements from a northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis gentilis) including one abnormally large egg with twin embryos". J. Raptor Res. 23: 113–115.
- Glutz von Blotzheim, U., Bauer, K. & Bezzel, E. (1971). Hanbuch der Vogel Mittleeuropa. Vol. 4: Falconiformes. Akademische Verslagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
- Huhtala, K., & Sulkava, S. (1981). Environmental influences on goshawk breeding in Finland. Understanding the goshawk. The International Association for Falconry and Conservation of Birds of Prey, Oxford, United Kingdom, 89-104.
- Parker, J. W. (1999). "Raptor attacks on people". Journal of Raptor Research. 33: 63–66.
- Montgomerie, R. D.; Weatherhead, P. J. (1988). "Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 63 (2): 167–187. doi:10.1086/415838.
- Uttendorfer, O. (1939). Die Ernahrung der deustchen Raubvogel und Eulen und ihre Bedeutung in der heimischen Natur. Neumann,-Neudamm, Melsungen, Germany.
- Bijlsma, R. G. (1991). Replacement of mates in a persecuted population of goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). Birds of Prey Bulletin, 4, 155-158.
- Siewert, H (1933). "Die Brutbiologie des Huhnerhabichts". Journal fur Ornithologie. 81: 44–94. doi:10.1007/bf01932166.
- Boal, C. W. (1994). "A photographic and behavioral guide to aging nestling Northern Goshawks". Studies in Avian Biology. 16: 32–40.
- Manosa, S. (1991). Biologia tofica, us de l'habitat I biologia de la rproduccio de l'Astor Accipiter gentilis (Linnaeus 1758) a la Segarra. PhD thesis, University of Barcelona, Spain.
- Boal, C. W. and J. E. Bacorn. 1994. Siblicide and cannibalism in northern goshawk nests. Auk no. 111:748-750.
- Estes, W. A., Dewey, S. R., & Kennedy, P. L. (1999). Siblicide at Northern Goshawk nests: Does food play a role? The Wilson Bulletin, 432–436.
- Lee, J. A. (1981). Comparative breeding behavior of the goshawk and Cooper's hawk. Master's Thesis, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT.
- Ingraldi, M. F. (2005). "A skewed sex ratio in Northern Goshawks: is it a sign of a stressed population?". Journal of Raptor Research. 39 (3): 247.
- Tyack, A. J.; Walls, S. S.; Kenward, R. E. (1998). "Behaviour in the post‐nestling dependence period of radio‐tagged Common Buzzards Buteo buteo". Ibis. 140 (1): 58–63. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1998.tb04541.x.
- Wikman, M., & Linden, H. (1981). The influence of food supply on goshawk population size. Understanding the goshawk, 105–113.
- Erdman, T. C., Brinker, D. F., Jacobs, J. P., Wilde, J., & Meyer, T. O. (1998). Productivity, population trend, and status of northern goshawks, Accipiter gentilis atricapillus, in northeastern Wisconsin. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 112(1), 17–27.
- Bechard, M. J., Fairhurst, G. D., & Kaltenecker, G. S. (2006). Occupancy, productivity, turnover, and dispersal of northern goshawks in portions of the northeastern great basin. Studies in Avian Biology, 31, 100.
- Kostrzewa, A. and R. Kostrzewa. 1990. The relationship of spring and summer weather with density and breeding performance of the Buzzard Buteo buteo, Goshawk Accipiter gentilis, and kestrel Falco tinnunculus. Ibis no. 132: 550–559.
- Marquiss, M., Petty, S. J., Anderson, D. I. K., & Legge, G. (2003). Contrasting Population Trends of the Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) in the Scottish/English Borders and North-east Scotland.
- Fowler, S. (1985). Recoveries, foreign retraps, returns and repeats: 1983-1984. Ontario Bird Banding no. 17:30–34.
- Frost, P. "Northern Goshawk (Accipter gentilis)". pauldfrost.co.uk.
- Saurola, P. (1976). Kanahaukkan kuolevuus ja kuolinsyyt. Suomen Luonto, 35: 310-314.
- Sunde, P (2002). "Starvation mortality and body condition of Goshawks Accipiter gentilis along a latitudinal gradient in Norway". Ibis. 144 (2): 301–310. doi:10.1046/j.1474-919x.2002.00050.x.
- Schroder, H. D. 1981. Diseases of birds of prey with special reference to infectious diseases. In Recent advances in the study of raptor diseases., edited by J. E. Cooper and A. G. Greenwood, 37–39. Keighley, W. Yorkshire, U.K: Chiron. Publ. Ltd.
- BirdLife, F. V. B. (2005). Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. British Birds, 98, 269-271.
- Kimmel, J. T. and R. H. Yahner. 1994. The northern goshawk in Pennsylvania: habitat use, survey protocols, and status (Final Report). Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park: School For. Resour.
- Rutz, C., Marquiss M., Bijlsma, R.G., Kenward, R.E. & Newtonn, I. (2005). Continental-scale abundance profile in an avian top predator. MS in Rutz, C. (2005). The northern goshawk: population dynamics and behavioural ecology (Doctoral dissertation, D. Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK).
- Haukioja, E. & Haukioja, H. (1970). Mortality rates of Finnish and Swedish goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). Finnish Game Research no. 31:13–20.
- Muthe-Kass Lund, H. (1950). Honsehauk. Fiske og Friluttsliv, 79: 100–103.
- Bergo, G. (1996). Honsehauken I Norge- utbreiing og bestandsforhold. pp. 8–14 in Ntgar, T. & Wiseth, B. (eds) Honshauken in skogbrukslandskaper. Norsk Insittut for Naturforskning Temaheft 5, Trondheim, Norway.
- Selås, V.; Kleven, O.; Steen, O. F. (2017). "Female turnover rate differs between two Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis nesting areas, as revealed by DNA analysis of moulted feathers". Ibis. 159 (3): 554–566. doi:10.1111/ibi.12475.
- Moilanen, P. (1976). Kanahaukkantapot ja fasaani. Suomen Luonto, 35: 315-318.
- Kramer, K. (1973). Habicht und Sperber. Neue Brehm Bucherei, Wittenberg-Lutherstadt, Germany.
- Drachmann, J. & Nielsen, J.T. (2002). Danske duehoges populationsokologi og forvatlning. Danish Environment Ministry report 398, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Kenward, R. E., V. Marcström and M. Karlbom. 1991. The goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) as predator and renewable resource. Proceed. Intl. Conf. Wise Use as a Conserv. Strategy no. 8:367-378.
- Morrison, Paul (1989). Bird Habitats of Great Britain and Ireland: A New Approach to Birdwatching. London, UK: Michael Joseph, Ltd. pp. 58–59. ISBN 978-0-7181-2899-9.
- Snyder, N. F. R.; Snyder, H.A.; Lincer, J.A.; Reynolds, R.T. (1973). "Organochlorines, heavy metals, and the biology of North American accipiters". BioScience. 23: 300–305. doi:10.2307/1296439.
- Anderson, D. W. and J. J. Hickey. 1972. Eggshell changes in certain North American birds. In Proceedings of the XVth International Ornitholological Congress., edited by H. H. Voous, 514-540. Leiden: P. J. Brill.
- Havera, S. P.; Duzan, R. E. (1986). "Organochlorine and PCB residues in tissues of raptors from Illinois, 1966-1981". Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 36: 23–32. doi:10.1007/bf01623470.
- Kenntner, N.; Krone, O.; Altenkamp, R.; Tataruch, F. (2003). "Environmental contaminants in liver and kidney of free-ranging northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) from three regions of Germany". Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 45 (1): 0128–0135. doi:10.1007/s00244-002-2100-8.
- Thissen, J., Müskens, G., & Opdam, P. (1982). Trends in the Dutch goshawk Accipiter gentilis population and their causes. Understanding the goshawk. International Association for Falconry and Conservation of Birds of Prey. Oxford, United Kingdom, 28-43.
- Borg, K., Wanntorp, H. E., Erne, K., & Hanko, E. (1969). Alkyl mercury poisoning in terrestrial Swedish wildlife. Svenska Jägareförbundet.
- Reynolds, R. T. (1989). Accipiters. Paper read at Proccedings of the Western Raptor Management Symposium and Workshop.
- Crocker-Bedford, D. C. (1990). "Goshawk reproduction and forest management". Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18: 262–269.
- Beier, P.; Drennan, J.E. (1997). "Forest structure and prey abundance in foraging areas of northern goshawks". Ecol. Applications. 7: 564–571. doi:10.2307/2269521.
- Hargis, C. D.; McCarthy, C.; Perloff, R. D. (1994). "Home ranges and habitats of northern goshawks in eastern California". Stud. Avian Biol. 16: 66–74.
- Woodbridge, B.; Detrich, P. J. (1994). "Territory occupancy and habitat patch size of northern goshawks in the southern Cascades of California". Stud. Avian Biol. 16: 83–87.
- Penteriani, V.; Faivre, B. (2001). "Effects of harvesting timber stands on goshawk nesting in two European areas". Biological Conservation. 101 (2): 211–216. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00068-4.
- Speiser, R., & Bosakowski, T. (1987). Nest site selection by northern goshawks in northern New Jersey and southeastern New York. Condor, 387-394.
- Reynolds, R. T., Graham, R. T., & Reiser, M. H. (1992). Management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States.
- Doyle, F. I. (2006). "Goshawks in Canada: population responses to harvesting and the appropriateness of using standard bird monitoring techniques to assess their status". Studies in Avian Biology. 31: 135.
- Speiser, R (1992). "Notes on the natural history of the northern goshawk". Kingbird. 42: 133–137.
- Woodbridge, B.; Hargis, C.D. (2006). Northern goshawk inventory and monitoring technical guide (PDF). General Technical Report WO-71 (Report). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
- Lockwood, W.B. (1993). The Oxford Dictionary of British Bird Names. OUP. ISBN 978-0-19-866196-2.
- Jameson, E.W., Jr. (1962). The Hawking of Japan, the History and Development of Japanese Falconry. Davis, California. p. 2.
- Beebe, F.L.; Webster, H.M. (2000). North American Falconry and Hunting Hawks (8th ed.). ISBN 0-685-66290-X.
- Oggins, R. S. (2004). The Kings and Their Hawks: Falconry in Medieval England. Yale University Press.
- Kenward, R. E.; Marquiss, M.; Newton, I. (1981). "What happens to goshawks trained for falconry". The Journal of Wildlife Management. 45 (3): 802–806. doi:10.2307/3808727.
- Kenward, R. E. (2009). Conservation values from falconry. Recreational Hunting, Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Science and Practice, 181.
- Millsap, B. A.; Allen, G. T. (2006). "Effects of falconry harvest on wild raptor populations in the United States: theoretical considerations and management recommendations". Wildlife Society Bulletin. 34 (5): 1392–1400. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1392:eofhow]2.0.co;2.
- "Falco atricapillus, Ash-coloured or Black-cap Hawk"; from American Ornithology 2nd edition, volume 1 (1828) by Alexander Wilson and George Ord. Colour plate from 1st edition by A. Wilson.
- John James Audubon. "The Goshawk", Ornithological Biography volume 2 (1834). "Goshawk" (note in Appendix), Ornithological Biography volume 5 (1839). "The Goshawk" (with illustration), Birds of America octavo edition, 1840.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Accipiter gentilis.|
|Wikispecies has information related to Accipiter gentilis|
- "Northern goshawk media". Internet Bird Collection.
- Northern goshawk species account – Cornell Lab of Ornithology
- Northern goshawk - Accipiter gentilis – USGS Patuxent Bird Identification InfoCenter
- Environment Canada goshawk page
- Ageing and sexing (PDF; 5.4 MB) by Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze
- Feathers of Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis)
- "Accipiter gentilis". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved 22 February 2009.
- The Medicine Bow National Forest (A habitat for the Northern goshawk) – Biodiversity Conservation Alliance
- BirdLife species factsheet for Accipiter gentilis
- "Accipiter gentilis". Avibase.
- Northern goshawk photo gallery at VIREO (Drexel University)
- Audio recordings of Northern goshawk on Xeno-canto.