Otter Commission
The Otter Commission was established after the First World War to create links of perpetuation from the war-time units of the Canadian Expeditionary Force (CEF) back to the institutionally separate units of the Canadian Militia.
The commission was headed by General Sir William Dillon Otter. Other members were Major General A.C. Macdonnell, Brigadier General E.A. Cruikshank (who served as Secretary) and Brigadier General A.G.L. McNaughton.[1]
The commission held hearings across the country in the autumn of 1919.[2] The catalysts for the commission were peace and fiscal austerity following the end of the First World War. It dealt with questions of national and military unity in the post-war era; ensuring regionalization in the culture of the armed services; determining the future organization and role of the militia; the economization of military expenditure; the integration of various functions; the reinvestment of existing resources into future capabilities; as well as the modernization of military equipment, doctrine, and training.[3]
The Otter Committee did not submit a formal report to the government or release any information to the press. Most of the adopted recommendations, authored primarily by Gwatkin and McNaughton, were enacted over a long period of time. By 1936, the threat of another conflict prompted the re-emergence and adoption of the last few Otter Commission recommendations that had not yet been put in place.[4]
Some academics point to the Otter Commission as part of the reason that the Canadian Army was not fully prepared for mobilization at the start of the Second World War. Due to little political support, the suggestion of veterans that Canadian have a regular army of 30,000 was rejected by the commission. Instead, it recommended a non-permanent force made up of eleven infantry and four cavalry divisions and a smaller permanent force that incorporated the Royal Canadian Dragoons, Lord Strathcona's Horse, Royal Canadian Regiment, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, and Royal 22e Regiment. However, the number of volunteers for the reserve units fell drastically after 1920 and some non-permanent regiments existed only on paper, as they could not find enough men to fill their ranks. In addition, the Otter Commission called for basic training and ignored the inadequate equipment and lack of mechanization within the Canadian Army after the First World War.[5]
This establishment of perpetuation, based primarily on geographical connections through the original recruiting areas of the CEF battalions, provided a basis by which the battle honours of the CEF units transferred back to the units of the standing Militia. Without this work, the CEF would have had no continuance with units of the Canadian Army today.
References
- ^ "Otter Committee". Canadiansoldiers.com. Retrieved 2016-12-12.
- ^ "Perpetuation of the Units of the Canadian Expeditionary Force (C.E.F.), 1914-1919". regimentalrogue.com. Retrieved 2017-01-31.
- ^ Morton, Desmond (1974). The Canadian General: Sir William Otter. Toronto: Hakkert. ISBN 0-88866-535-0.
- ^ Godefroy, Andrew (2012). "The Ghost of General Otter: Putting the Canadian Forces Report on Transformation 2011 in Context" (PDF). Retrieved 2017-04-23.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Rose, Larry D. (2013-10-28). Mobilize!: Why Canada Was Unprepared for the Second World War. Dundurn. ISBN 978-1-4597-1066-5.
 | This article about an organization in Canada is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |