Jump to content

Palaeeudyptes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Apokryltaros (talk | contribs) at 03:31, 28 April 2016 (Reverted 1 edit by 122.60.4.118 (talk) to last revision by Hike395. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Palaeeudyptes
Temporal range: Middle Eocene–Late Oligocene
Huxley’s original illustration of the fossil of an ankle bone from Palaeeudyptes antarcticus described in 1859.
Fossil
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Subfamily:
Genus:
Palaeeudyptes

Huxley, 1859
Type species
Palaeeudyptes antarcticus
Huxley, 1859
Species

Palaeeudyptes antarcticus
Palaeeudyptes gunnari
Palaeeudyptes marplesi
Palaeeudyptes klekowskii

Synonyms

Eosphaeniscus Wiman, 1905

Palaeeudyptes is an extinct genus of large penguins, currently containing four accepted species. They were probably larger than almost all living penguins, with the smaller species being about the size of an emperor penguin and the largest ones having stood about 2 meters tall.[1]

Of the four species, two (P. gunnari and P. klekowskii) are known from numerous remains found in Middle or Late Eocene strata (34 to 50 MYA) of the La Meseta Formation on Seymour Island, Antarctica. P. antarcticus, the first fossil penguin described, is only really known from a single incomplete tarsometatarsus found in the Late Oligocene Otekaike Limestone (23 to 28, possibly up to 34 MYA) at Kakanui, New Zealand, but numerous other bones have been tentatively assigned to the species. The other described New Zealand species, P. marplesi, is known from parts of a skeleton, mainly leg bones, from the Middle or Late Eocene Burnside Mudstone (34 to 40 MYA) at Burnside, Dunedin. To this species also a number of additional remains have been tentatively assigned. The problem with the indeterminate New Zealand specimens is that they at least in part are intermediate in size between the two species (Simpson, 1971). It may be that P. marplesi simply evolved into the smaller P. antarcticus. Bones unassignable to species also were found on Seymour Island, but in these cases they seem to be from juvenile individuals or are simply too damaged to be of diagnostic value (Jadwiszczak, 2006).

In addition, an incomplete right tibiotarsus (South Australian Museum P10862) and one left humerus (South Australian Museum P7158) and assignable to this genus were found in the Late Eocene Blanche Point Marls at Witton Bluff near Adelaide, Australia (Simpson, 1946, 1971). Additionally, an incomplete humerus identified as Palaeeudyptes was recovered in southernmost Chile (Sallaberry et al., 2010), from middle to late Eocene beds of the Río Turbio Formation, near Puerto Natales, 200 km south from Torres del Paine National Park.

The supposed genus Wimanornis, based on two Seymour Island humeri, is apparently a synonym of P. gunnari (Jadwiszcak, 2006).

The genus is the namesake for the subfamily of primitive penguins, Palaeeudyptinae. Altogether, their osteological characteristics seem to have been somewhat less advanced that those of the slightly smaller Archaeospheniscus and about on par with the gigantic Anthropornis. The exact nature of the relationship of the Palaeeudyptinae to modern penguins is unknown.

References

  • Huxley, Thomas Henry (1859): On a fossil bird and a fossil cetacean from New Zealand. Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc. London 15: 670-677.
  • Jadwiszczak, Piotr (2006): Eocene penguins of Seymour Island, Antarctica: Taxonomy. Polish Polar Research 27(1): 3–62. PDF fulltext
  • Simpson, George Gaylord (1946): Fossil penguins. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 87: 7-99. PDF fulltext
  • Simpson, George Gaylord (1971): A review of the pre-Pleistocene penguins of New Zealand. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 144: 319–378. PDF fulltext
  • Sallaberry, M., Yury-Yáñez, R., Otero, R. A., Soto-Acuña, S., and Torres G.,T. (2010): Eocene Birds from the Western Margin of Southernmost South America. Journal of Paleontology; November 2010; v. 84; no. 6; p. 1061-1070; doi:10.1666/09-157.1 [1]