Post-democracy
 | This article may document a neologism or protologism in such a manner as to promote it. |
The term Post-democracy designate a State conducted by democratic rules, but whose application is progressively limited. The English conservative journalist Peter Oborne presented a documentary of the 2005 general election, arguing that it had become anti-democratic because it targeted a number of floating voters with a narrow agenda.
Definition Tentative
This term appeared to define a running evolution within the democracies during the 21st century.
It is a polemic term because it calls attention on recognised democracies that are losing some of their foundations do evolve toward an Aristocratic regime.
A Post-democracy may be characterised with:
- non representative elections
- citizen rights are not respected by the state, or its representatives
- or, impossibility to get balanced debates
Examples
(to finish)
- excluded populations
- special laws
- debates quality
External links
- Transclusion error: {{En}} is only for use in File namespace. Use {{langx|en}} or {{in lang|en}} instead. On Coping with "Post Democracy"
- Transclusion error: {{En}} is only for use in File namespace. Use {{langx|en}} or {{in lang|en}} instead. What is Post-Democracy?
- Template:Es La postdemocracia
- Template:Fr Postdémocratie
- Template:Fr Qui veut de la post-démocratie ?
 | This article about politics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |