Jump to content

Praepositus sacri cubiculi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renato de Carvalho Ferreira (talk | contribs) at 20:58, 8 November 2015 (Notable praepositi). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The praepositus sacri cubiculi ("provost of the sacred bedchamber", in Template:Lang-el) was one of the senior palace offices in the late Roman Empire. Its holder was usually a eunuch, and acted as the grand chamberlain of the palace, wielding considerable authority and influence. In the 7th or 8th century, the title was also given to an order of rank for eunuch palace servants. The title and office continued in use in the Byzantine Empire until the late 11th century.

History and evolution

The first securely identifiable holder of the office was Eusebius under Emperor Constantius II (r. 337–361), but the position may have been introduced already under Emperor Constantine I (r. 306–337), in replacement of the older a cubiculo. He controlled the corps of the cubicularii (Template:Lang-el, koubikoularioi), also eunuchs, and was responsible for the imperial bedchamber, wardrobe and receptions.[1][2] Originally under the control of the castrensis sacri palatii, he soon became directly subordinated to the Byzantine emperor. His proximity to the Byzantine emperor gave him great power, and several praepositi wielded considerable influence in the governance of the Byzantine Empire.[2] In the Notitia Dignitatum, the praepositus is listed immediately after the praetorian prefects, the urban prefect and the magistri militum. However, due to the loss of the relevant pages of the Notitia, we do not know the structure of his officium.[3] Senior assistants were the primicerius sacri cubiculi and the comes sacrae vestis.

During the 4th-5th centuries, the praepositus gained in power: in the late 4th century, he gained control over the imperial estates of Cappadocia (the domus divina per Cappadociam of the Notitia), and was elevated in rank to vir illustris and the equivalent of quaestor. A separate praepositus was also established for the household of the Byzantine empress (praepositus Augustae), with a similar structure of subordinate officials.[2] In the Western Roman Empire, the post continued in existence until its fall, and was also used in the court of the Ostrogoth king Theodoric the Great, where it was held by a Goth, Triwila. In the mid-6th century, however, the supervision of the Cappadocian estates was entrusted to a separate official in charge of the imperial patrimony,[4] and its authority declined.[2]

In the 7th-8th centuries, paralleling changes in many other administrative offices, the position of praepositus, or praipositos in Greek, was much reduced in power, as parts of his officium were split off. The cubicularii of the bedchamber (distinguished as κοιτωνῖται, koitōnitai in Greek) were separated under the parakoimōmenos, while the imperial wardrobe (Template:Lang-la, Template:Lang-el, [basilikon] vestiarion) under its head, the prōtovestiarios, was also made into a separate department. The praipositos continued to supervise the remainder of the koubikoularioi, with the primikērios tou kouboukleiou as his chief aide.[1] He retained a considerable role in court ceremonies, and ranked in the higher class of the patrikioi. According to Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos (r. 913–959), the praipositos, together with the prōtomagistros and the eparch of Constantinople used to form a regency in the Byzantine emperor's absence.[5]

The continuing actual office of praipositos, however, is not to be confused with the dignity (Greek: δια βραβείου άξια, dia brabeiou axia) of the same name, which was a court rank created in the 7th or 8th century and restricted to eunuchs. According to Philotheos's Klētorologion of 899, it ranked below the dignity of patrikios and above that of prōtospatharios, and the insignia (brabeion) of the office were ivory tablets.[6] The title is last attested in 1087.[2]

Notable praepositi

References

  1. ^ a b Bury 1911, p. 120.
  2. ^ a b c d e Kazhdan 1991, p. 1709.
  3. ^ Bury 1911, p. 123.
  4. ^ Bury 1911, p. 79.
  5. ^ Bury 1911, p. 124.
  6. ^ Bury 1911, p. 121.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Martindale, Jones & Morris 1980, p. 1263.
  8. ^ Holum 1982, p. 191.
  9. ^ Martindale, Jones & Morris 1980, p. 1264.
  10. ^ Martindale, Jones & Morris 1980, p. 67-68.
  11. ^ Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, p. 1485.

Sources

  • Bury, John Bagnell (1911). The Imperial Administrative System of the Ninth Century - With a Revised Text of the Kletorologion of Philotheos. London: Oxford University Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Holum, Kenneth G. (1982). Theodosian Empresses: Women and Imperial Dominion in Late Antiquity. The Transformation of the Classical Heritage 3. Berkeley: University of California Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Martindale, John Robert; Jones, Arnold Hugh Martin; Morris, J., eds. (1980). The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Vol. II: A.D. 395–527. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-20159-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Martindale, John Robert; Jones, Arnold Hugh Martin; Morris, J., eds. (1992). The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Vol. III: A.D. 527–641. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-20160-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Kazhdan, Alexander Petrovich, ed. (1991). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. New York, New York and Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)