Jump to content

President v M&G Media

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FrescoBot (talk | contribs) at 01:13, 31 October 2017 (Bot: removing misplaced invisible LTR marks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v M & G Media Ltd is an important case in South African administrative law. It concerned a report by two senior judges who were asked by the President of the Republic to visit Zimbabwe shortly before its presidential election in 2002. "Surprisingly,"[1] instead of confirming an order to release the report, a majority of the Constitutional Court resorted to section 80 of the Promotion of Access to Information Act[2] (PAIA) and remitted the matter to the High Court for it to examine the report in secret and make a determination.

References

  • C. Hoexter Administrative Law in South Africa 2 ed (2012).

Notes

  1. ^ Hoexter Administrative Law 100.
  2. ^ Act 2 of 2000.