Jump to content

Questar Corporation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Julietdeltalima (talk | contribs) at 23:16, 1 December 2016 (Reverted good faith edits by W12ard0f (talk): Reverting inappropriate external link per WP:EL; Wikipedia isn't a collection of links. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Questar Corporation
Company typePrivate
IndustryManufacturing
Founded1950
HeadquartersNew Hope, Pennsylvania, USA
Key people
Donald J. Bandurick, President and CEO
ProductsOptical / mechanical devices
Websitewww.questarcorporation.com

Questar Corporation is a company based in New Hope, Pennsylvania, which manufactures precision optical devices for consumer, industrial, aerospace, and military markets.

Questars have been associated with many well-known scientists and other personalities; for example, in 1959, Wernher Von Braun purchased a telescope manufactured by the company.[1]

The Questar 3-1/2” Maksutov Cassegrain

Questar 3 ½”

In development since 1946, the Questar 3-1/2” has been the company's most notable product. Braymer’s basic concept for the telescope was one of portability, compactness, and ease of use. He used a "Catadioptric" Maksutov design, named after its inventor Dmitry Maksutov, for the optical tube assembly. Braymer used a modified Cassegrain design that added an aluminized spot to the Maksutov corrector plate, creating a compact folded light path (this design is sometimes called a "Spot- Maksutov). To avoid a conflict with a design patent held by John Gregory licensed to Perkin-Elmer, Braymer put the secondary spot on the outer (R1) surface of the corrector lens. In the mid-1960s the patent issue was settled, and Questar’s Maksutov-Cassegrains after that time use the Gregory design with the aluminized spot on the inside of the corrector (R2).[2] The design was originally envisioned as a 5-inch (130 mm) telescope, but it was decided a telescope of that size would not fit the market they were aiming for, since it would be too heavy and expensive.[3]

References

Further reading