Rape crisis movement
 | This article is missing information about Error: you must specify what information is missing.. (February 2015) |
The Rape Crisis Movement began in the 1970s when leftist activist and members of counter-culture began to openly confront or breaking the silence on the issue of rape.[1] Movement members and supporters brought the issue to the public commons by vocalizing the suffering that occurs a result of rape. At the time the movement was considered radical because it destabilized the existing social norms. The movement was concerned with the experiences of women and is credited with the legitimization of victim claims. Prior to the movement, rape victims involved in legal trails were subjected to further victimization at the hands of defense attorneys and the court system. Victims rights and protection became a focus as a result of the movement.
History of the Movement
In the early 1970s the Rape Crisis Movement was conceptualized and promoted by women focused on the experiences of rape victims. Leftist activists and members of counter-culture were among the first to join the movement. Early goals of the movement included disrupting and changing social norms that promoted the oppression of women and violence against them and the creation of a support network that engendered fear and blame free environments where women were safe to join a process of self and mutual aid.
In 1974 the Federal Government granted funding to Pittsburg Action Against Rape. this was the first time the Federal Government provided financial aid to a rape center. By the late 1970s the United States had over 1,000 rape crises centers in operation. During the same period of time the ideology of the movement shifted. Prior to 1974 most member movements self identified as radical feminist. By the end of the 1970s most members and crisis support staff self identified as liberal reformists. The movement began to become increasingly professionalized in the early 1980s, focusing on organizational structure, staffing, funding and legislation.[2]
Legislation
Changes: Many states reformed their laws to redefine the consequences of rape convictions. The new penalty would be a gradation of offenses compared to when it used to be a single offense. More importantly, certain laws or requirements were repealed which allowed for women to have more authority in their trials. The first element to be repealed was the requirement that the victim’s testimony had to be corroborated by a witness. It was also repealed that the victim had to have physically resisted the attacker. This aspect particularly protected women with disabilities since they may not have the complete ability to ward off an assailant.
Rape Shield Laws: The enactment of rape shield laws also helped to provide further protection for rape victims during trial. These laws were created to restrict the past sexual history of the victim from being used against them during the trial. Formerly, some defendants’ cases revolved around discrediting the victim’s claims by claiming that she was promiscuous so it was likely to be consensual. [3]
Education and Outreach
![[icon]](/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small} | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (July 2010) |
International Influence
| This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (July 2010) |
See also
Notes
- ^ Matthews, Nancy (1994). Confronting Rape: The Feminist Anti-Rape Movement and the State. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 0 415 11401 2.
{{cite book}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help) - ^ Collins, Barbara; Whalen, Mary (Jan 1989). "The Rape Crisis Movement: Radical or Reformist?". Social Work. 34 (1): 61.
- ^ Frohmann, Lisa, and Elizabeth Mertz. "Legal Reform and Social Construction: Violence, Gender, and the Law." Law & Social Inquiry 19.4 (1994): 829-851.
 | This activism-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |