Red dress effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Red Dress Effect

The red dress effect is a putative phenomenon in which people wearing red clothing, such as a red dress, are perceived to be more sexually appealing than they are when wearing other colours. In primates, a visual indicator of female fertility occurs by way of swelling during the follicular phase and is correlated with increased estrogen levels. It has been asserted that this effect acts subconsciously because participants rarely report that they used color in their attractiveness judgments.[1] However, only one study has tested whether or not conscious awareness matters, with its findings casting doubt on this earlier speculation.[2]

Hypothesis[edit]

Red face uakari monkey.

Evolution[edit]

A plants entomophilous flowers make a display when fertile to attract pollinating insects, bats, birds or other animals. In the wild, when many species of non-human primate females become fertile, their estrogen level rises, which causes their blood vessels to open up, leading to redness on the skin, especially near the face,[3] chest and genitalia.[4][5] The color display on some female primates is called sexual swelling. This increase in redness has been shown to attract male counterparts, expressed by their increased activity in sex, self-stimulation, and attention towards the females. Therefore, there are reasons to believe of the existence of evolutionary instincts that associate red with fertility, assuming the animal in question can perceive colour with their eye.

Near hairless red face Macaque.
Colorful display on male baboons "Mandrill"

Social conditioning[edit]

Folklore,[6] mythology and literature associate red with fertility, and women are thought to have worn the equivalent of a red lipstick as early as 10,000 B.C.[7] and so sexual receptiveness and red may be a result of social conditioning. However, this social conditioning may have originated for biological and evolutionary reasons, and is simply an extension of our primal instincts. The human genitals, such as the vulva normally have hair that would hide any coloured skin underneath.

Evidence for and against[edit]

In a study by Pazda[8] it was shown that females wearing red are rated more attractive by males. They explained this by referring to the biological aspect that sexually receptive women are more attractive because of them having a higher probability for engaging in sexual activity, as well as a higher probability for the males to successfully reproduce.

The same effect seems to work the other way round. In a disputed[9] study by Elliot[10] it was shown that males wearing red are rated more attractive by females.

A large replication study by Peperkoorn et al. found no evidence for the red dress effect.[11] Indeed, another large experiment found no evidence that red color cues are systematically associated with attractiveness ratings, casting doubt on the underlying mechanisms typically used to explain the red dress effect.[2]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Strain, Daniel. "The Red-Dress Effect".
  2. ^ a b >Williams, L. A.; Schofield, T. P.; Whitford, T. J. (2017). "Romantic Red: Testing the Characteristics of Color–Attraction Effects in a Novel Paradigm". Collabra: Psychology. 3 (1): 10. doi:10.1525/collabra.54.
  3. ^ "Proximate causes of the red face of the bald uakari monkey" Authors P. Mayor, J. Mamani, D. Montes, C. González-Crespo, M. A. Sebastián, M. Bowler. Published 29 July 2015.DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150145
  4. ^ Wickings, J. M. (2004). "Sexual swelling in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx): A test of the reliable indicator hypothesis". Behavioral Ecology. 15 (3): 438–445. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh027.
  5. ^ Dixson, A.F. (1983). "Observations on the evolution and behavioral significance of "sexual skin" in female primates". Advances in the Study of Behavior. Advances in the Study of Behavior. 13: 63–106. doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60286-7. ISBN 9780120045136.
  6. ^ Hutchings, John (2004). "Color in folklore and tradition—The principles". Color Research and Application. 29: 57–66. doi:10.1002/col.10212.
  7. ^ Low, B (1979). "Sexual selection and human ornamentation". In Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Irons, William. Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behaviour: An Anthropological Perspective. Duxbury. pp. 462–487. ISBN 978-0-87872-193-1.
  8. ^ Pazda, Adam D.; Elliot, Andrew J.; Greitemeyer, Tobias (2011). "Sexy red: Perceived sexual receptivity mediates the red-attraction relation in men viewing woman". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48 (3): 787. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.009.
  9. ^ Francis, G (2013). "Publication bias in "Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men," by Elliot et al. (2010)". Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 142 (1): 292–6. doi:10.1037/a0027923. PMID 23398185.
  10. ^ Elliot, Andrew J.; Niesta Kayser, Daniela; Greitemeyer, Tobias; Lichtenfeld, Stephanie; Gramzow, Richard H.; Maier, Markus A.; Liu, Huijun (2010). "Red, Rank, and Romance in Women Viewing Men". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 139 (3): 399. doi:10.1037/a0019689.
  11. ^ Peperkoorn, L. S.; Roberts, S. C.; Pollet, T. V. (2016). "Revisiting the Red Effect on Attractiveness and Sexual Receptivity: No Effect of the Color Red on Human Mate Preferences". Evolutionary Psychology (October–December 2016): 1–13. doi:10.1177/1474704916673841.