Jump to content

Reproductive success

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot NG (talk | contribs) at 23:52, 21 November 2016 (Reverting possible vandalism by 2001:1970:561D:3C00:9995:A9C9:F417:24A2 to version by 2602:306:B8BE:4EF0:F2A2:25FF:FE87:6BB1. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A sperm fertilizing an egg in sexual reproduction is one stage of reproductive success


Reproductive success is defined as the passing of genes onto the next generation in a way that they too can pass on those genes. This is not solely the number of offspring produced by an individual, but also, as Ronald Fisher outlined in 1915 the probable reproductive success of those offspring, making mate choice (a form of sexual selection) an important factor in this success,[1] making biological fitness a key element in the theories of natural selection and evolution.

Nutritional contribution

Factors like nutrition contribute to factors that influence reproductive success. These include different amounts of consumption and more specific carbohydrate to protein ratios. In some cases, the amounts or ratios of intake are more influential during certain stages of the lifespan. For example, in the Mexican fruit fly, male protein intake is critical only at eclosion. Intake at this time provides longer lasting reproductive ability. After this developmental stage, protein intake will have no effect and is not necessary for reproductive success.[2] In addition, Ceratitis capitata males were experimented on to see how protein influence during the larval stage affects mating success. Males were fed either a high protein diet, which consisted of 6.5g/100mL, or a no protein diet during the larval stage. Males that were fed protein had more copulations than those that weren’t fed protein, which ultimately correlates with a higher mating success.[3] Protein-deprived black blow fly males have been seen to exhibit lower numbers of oriented mounts and inseminate fewer females than more lively fed males.[4] In still other instances, prey deprivation or an inadequate diet has been shown to lead to a partial or complete halt in male mating activity.[5] Copulation time lasted longer for sugar-fed males than protein-fed flies, showing that carbohydrates were more necessary for a longer copulation duration.[6]

In mammals, amounts of protein, carbohydrates, and fats are seen to influence reproductive success. This was evaluated among 28 female black bears evaluated by measuring the number of cubs born. Using different foods during the fall including corn, herbaceous, red oak, beech, and cherry, nutritional facts of protein, carbohydrate, and fat were noted, as each varied in percent compositions. Seventy-percent of the bears who had high fat and high carbohydrate diets produced cubs. Conversely, all 10 females who had low carbohydrate diets did not reproduce cubs, deeming carbohydrates a critical factor for reproductive success where fat was not a hindrance.[7]

Adequate nutrition at pre-mating time periods showed to have the most effect on various reproductive processes in mammals. Increased nutrition, in general, during this time was most beneficial for oocyte and embryo development. As a result, offspring number and viability was also improved. Thus, proper nutrition timing during the pre-mating time is key for development and long-term benefit of the offspring.[8] Two different diets were fed to Florida scrub-jays and breeding performance was noted to have different effects. One diet consisted of high protein and high fat, and the other consisting of just high fat. The significant result was that the birds with the high protein and high fat diet laid heavier eggs than the birds with the rich-in-fat diet. There was a difference in the amount of water inside the eggs, which accounted for the different weights. It’s hypothesized that the added water resulting from the adequate protein-rich and fat-rich diet may contribute to development and survival of the chick, therefore aiding reproductive success.[9]

Dietary intake also improves egg production, which can also be considered to help create viable offspring. Post-mating changes are seen in organisms in response to necessary conditions for development. This is depicted in the two-spotted cricket where feeding was tested for in females. It was found that mated females exhibited more overall consumption than unmated. Observations of female crickets showed that after laying their eggs, their protein intake increased towards the end of the second day. The female crickets therefore require a larger consumption of protein to nourish the development of subsequent eggs and even mating. More specifically, using geometrical framework analysis, mated females fed off of a more protein rich diet after mating. Unmated and mated female crickets were found to prefer a 2:1 and 3.5:1 protein to carbohydrate, respectively.[10] In the Japanese quail, the influence of diet quality on egg production was studied. The diet quality differed in the percent composition of protein, with the high-protein diet having 20%, and the low-protein diet having 12%. It was found that both the number of eggs produced and the size of the eggs were greater in the high-protein diet than the low. What was found unaffected, however, was the maternal antibody transmission. Thus, immune response was not affected since there was still a source of protein, although low. This means that the bird is able to compensate for the lack of protein in the diet by protein reserves, for example.[11] Higher concentrations of protein in diet have also positively correlated with gamete production across various animals. The formation of oothecae in brown-banded cockroaches based on protein intake was tested. A protein intake of 5% deemed too low as it delayed mating and an extreme of 65% protein directly killed the cockroach. Oothecae production for the female as was more optimal at a 25% protein diet.[12]

Although there is a trend of protein and carbohydrates being essential for various reproductive functions including copulation success, egg development, and egg production, the ratio and amounts of each are not fixed. These values vary across a span of animals, from insects to mammals. For example, many insects may need a diet consisting of both protein and carbohydrates with a slightly higher protein ratio for reproductive success. On the other hand, a mammal like a black bear would need a higher amount of carbohydrates and fats, but not necessarily protein. Different types of animals have different necessities based on their make-up. One cannot generalize as the results may vary across different types of animals, and even more across different species.

References

  1. ^ Fisher, R. A. (1915). "The evolution of sexual preference". Eugenic Review. 7 (3): 185. PMC 2987134. PMID 21259607.
  2. ^ Harwood JF, Chen K, Liedo P, Muller HG, Wang JL, Morice AE, Carey JR, (2015). Female access and diet affect insemination success, senescence, and the cost of reproduction in male Mexican fruit flies Anastrepha ludens. of Entomology, University of California, Physiological Entomology, 40(1):65-71.
  3. ^ Joachim-Bravo, Iara Sordi, Anjos, Cyntia Santiago, & Costa, Anne Moreira. (2009). The role of protein in the sexual behaviour of males of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae): mating success, copula duration and number of copulations. Zoologia (Curitiba), 26(3), 407-412.
  4. ^ Stoffolano, J. G., Tobin, E. N., Wilson, J., and Yin, C.-M. (1995). Diet affects insemination and sexual activity in male Phormia regina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88: 240-246.
  5. ^ Foster, W. A. (1967). Hormone mediated nutritional control of sexual behaviour in male dung flies. Science 125: 331-336.Bartell, R. J., Shorey, H. H., and Barton Browne, L. (1969). Pheromonal stimulation of the sexual activity of males of the sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina (Calliphoridae) by the female. Anim. Behav. 17: 576-585.
  6. ^ Yuval, B.; K. Levy; R. Kaspi; P. Taylor; & T. Shelly. (2007). Breakfast of champions or kiss of death? Survival and sexual performance of protein-fed, sterile Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae).
  7. ^ Elowe and Dodge, 1989. K.D. Elowe, W.D. Dodge. Factors affecting black bear reproductive success and cub survival. J. Wildl. Mgmt., 53, pp. 962–968.
  8. ^ Ashworth CJ, Toma LM, Hunter MG. (2009). Nutritional effects on oocyte and embryo development in mammals: implications for reproductive efficiency and environmental sustainability. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 364:3351–61.
  9. ^ Reynolds SJ, Schoech SJ, Bowman R. Nutritional quality of prebreeding diet influences breeding performance of the Florida scrub-jay. Oecologia. 2003;134:308–316.
  10. ^ Tsukamoto, Y., Kataoka, H., Nagasawa, H., & Nagata, S. (2014). Mating changes the female dietary preference in the two-spotted cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Frontiers in Physiology, 5, 95.
  11. ^ Grindstaff, J. L., Demas, G. E., & Ketterson, E. D. (2005). Diet quality affects egg size and number but does not reduce maternal antibody transmission in japanese quail coturnix japonica. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74(6), 1051-1058.
  12. ^ Hamilton, R (1990) L., Cooper, R. A., and Schal, CThe influence of nymphal and adult dietary protein on food intake and reproduction in female brown-banded cockroaches.. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 55: pp. 23-31

Further reading

  • T. H. Clutton-Brock (editor). (1990) Reproductive Success : Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems University Of Chicago Press.
  • Harwood JF, Chen K, Liedo P, Muller HG, Wang JL, Morice AE, Carey JR, (2015). Female access and diet affect insemination success, senescence, and the cost of reproduction in male Mexican fruit flies Anastrepha ludens. of Entomology, University of California, Physiological Entomology, 40(1):65-71.
  • Joachim-Bravo, Iara Sordi, Anjos, Cyntia Santiago, & Costa, Anne Moreira. (2009). The role of protein in the sexual behaviour of males of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae): mating success, copula duration and number of copulations. Zoologia (Curitiba), 26(3), 407-412.
  • Stoffolano, J. G., Tobin, E. N., Wilson, J., and Yin, C.-M. (1995). Diet affects insemination and sexual activity in male Phormia regina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88: 240-246.
  • Foster, W. A. (1967). Hormone mediated nutritional control of sexual behaviour in male dung flies. Science 125: 331-336.Bartell, R. J., Shorey, H. H., and Barton Browne, L. (1969). Pheromonal stimulation of the sexual activity of males of the sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina (Calliphoridae) by the female. Anim. Behav. 17: 576-585.
  • Yuval, B.; K. Levy; R. Kaspi; P. Taylor; & T. Shelly. (2007). Breakfast of champions or kiss of death? Survival and sexual performance of protein-fed, sterile Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae).
  • Elowe and Dodge, 1989. K.D. Elowe, W.D. Dodge. Factors affecting black bear reproductive success and cub survival. J. Wildl. Mgmt., 53, pp. 962–968
  • Ashworth CJ, Toma LM, Hunter MG. (2009). Nutritional effects on oocyte and embryo development in mammals: implications for reproductive efficiency and environmental sustainability. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 364:3351–61.
  • Reynolds SJ, Schoech SJ, Bowman R. Nutritional quality of prebreeding diet influences breeding performance of the Florida scrub-jay. Oecologia. 2003;134:308–316.
  • Tsukamoto, Y., Kataoka, H., Nagasawa, H., & Nagata, S. (2014). Mating changes the female dietary preference in the two-spotted cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Frontiers in Physiology, 5, 95.
  • Grindstaff, J. L., Demas, G. E., & Ketterson, E. D. (2005). Diet quality affects egg size and number but does not reduce maternal antibody transmission in japanese quail coturnix japonica. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74(6), 1051-1058.
  • Hamilton, R (1990) L., Cooper, R. A., and Schal, CThe influence of nymphal and adult dietary protein on food intake and reproduction in female brown-banded cockroaches.. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 55: pp. 23–31