Jump to content

Republic v. Bynum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cydebot (talk | contribs) at 20:58, 1 September 2015 (Robot - Moving category 1844 in Texas to Category:1844 in the Republic of Texas per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015 June 19.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Republic v. Bynum
CourtSupreme Court of the Republic of Texas
Full case name Republic of Texas v. William D. Bynum
Decided1840
CitationsDallam 376 (1840); 1840 Tex. LEXIS 18
Holding
That uncertainty in the description of the offense charged in the indictment requires that the person be discharged from custody.
Court membership
Judges sittingThomas Jefferson Rusk, Anthony B. Shelby, William J. Jones, John T. Mills, and John Hemphill
Case opinions
MajorityWm. J. Jones

Republic v. Bynum, Dallam 376 (1844), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas which held that uncertainty in the description of the offense charged in the indictment requires that the person be discharged from custody. The Court issued a writ of habeas corpus to order the release of the prisoner.

Background

William D. Bynum was convicted of an offense and confined, and requested a writ of habeas corpus.[1]

Decision

Judge William J. Jones stated that the indictment charged "or other articles of value" did not sufficiently describe a criminal offense.[2] It is not listed as an offense under either the common law or the statutes of the Republic. He then stated that the rules of construction (describing the rule of lenity) required that these matters be determined in favor of the accused, and issued the writ to discharge Bynum from custody.

References

  1. ^ Republic v. Bynum, Dallam 376 (1840).
  2. ^ Bynum, at 376.