Jump to content

Runciman Report

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Noteremote (talk | contribs) at 04:33, 18 March 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Runciman Report[1] was a 2000 Police Foundation (2000) inquiry into the United Kingdom's Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (MDA) authored by Viscountess Runciman.

Recommendations

It called for the classification system to be more closely based on the scientific evidence of relative harm and consequently that cannabis should be reclassified to Class C from Class B. This was on the grounds that making cannabis possession a non-arrestable offence would reduce the number of "otherwise law-abiding, mainly young people" being criminalised and potentially receiving a custodial sentence to the detriment of their futures (p 7). It was also perceived that this could remove a source of friction between the police and the wider community and that this would free up police time (Monaghan 2008: 213). It also argued for the reclassification of LSD and MDMA from Class A to Class B and a reduction in the maximum sentence for possession of Class As, from seven years to twelve months. Lady Runciman's report also recommended the creation of a new offence of drug dealing.

See also

References

Further reading

  • Monaghan, Mark. 2008. "Appreciating cannabis: the paradox of evidence in evidence-based policy making". Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 4: 209--231.