Jump to content

Schizosaccharomyces pombe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rjwilmsi (talk | contribs) at 14:29, 10 November 2016 (→Fission yeast as a model system: Journal cites, added 1 PMC using AWB (12100)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Fungi
Division:
Ascomycota
Class:
Schizosaccharomycetes
Order:
Schizosaccharomycetales
Family:
Schizosaccharomycetaceae
Genus:
Schizosaccharomyces
Species:
S. pombe
Binomial name
Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Lindner (1893)

Schizosaccharomyces pombe, also called "fission yeast", is a species of yeast used in traditional brewing and as a model organism in molecular and cell biology. It is a unicellular eukaryote, whose cells are rod-shaped. Cells typically measure 3 to 4 micrometres in diameter and 7 to 14 micrometres in length. Its genome, which is approximately 14.1 million base pairs, is estimated to contain 4,970 protein-coding genes and at least 450 non-coding RNAs.[1]

These cells maintain their shape by growing exclusively through the cell tips and divide by medial fission to produce two daughter cells of equal sizes, which makes them a powerful tool in cell cycle research.

Fission yeast was isolated in 1893 by Paul Lindner from East African millet beer. The species name pombe is the Swahili word for beer. It was first developed as an experimental model in the 1950s: by Urs Leupold for studying genetics,[2][3] and by Murdoch Mitchison for studying the cell cycle.[4][5][6]

Paul Nurse, a fission yeast researcher, successfully merged the independent schools of fission yeast genetics and cell cycle research. Together with Lee Hartwell and Tim Hunt, Nurse won the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work on cell cycle regulation.

The sequence of the S. pombe genome was published in 2002, by a consortium led by the Sanger Institute, becoming the sixth model eukaryotic organism whose genome has been fully sequenced. This has fully unlocked the power of this organism, with many genes homologous to human disease genes being identified. In 2006, sub-cellular localization of almost all the proteins in S. pombe was published using green fluorescent protein as a molecular tag.[7]

Schizosaccharomyces pombe has also become an important organism in studying the cellular responses to DNA damage and the process of DNA replication.

Approximately 160 natural strains of S. pombe have been isolated. These have been collected from a variety of locations including Europe, North and South America, and Asia. The majority of these strains have been collected from cultivated fruits such as apples and grapes, or from the various alcoholic beverages, such as Brazilian Cachaça. S. pombe is also known to be present in fermented tea, kombucha.[8] It is not clear at present whether S. pombe is the major fermenter or a contaminant in such brews. The natural ecology of Schizosaccharomyces yeasts is not well-studied.

History

Schizosaccharomyces pombe was first discovered in 1893 when a group working in a Brewery Association Laboratory in Germany was looking at sediment found in millet beer imported from East Africa that gave it an acidic taste. The term schizo, meaning "split" or "fission", had previously been used to describe other Schizosaccharomycetes. The addition of the word pombe was due to its isolation from East African beer, as pombe means "beer" in Swahili. The standard S. pombe strains were isolated by Urs Leupold in 1946 and 1947 from a culture that he obtained from the yeast collection in Delft, The Netherlands. It was deposited there by A. Osterwalder under the name S. pombe var. liquefaciens, after he isolated it in 1924 from French wine (most probably rancid) at the Federal Experimental Station of Vini- and Horticulture in Wädenswil, Switzerland. The culture used by Urs Leupold contained (besides others) cells with the mating types h90 (strain 968), h- (strain 972), and h+ (strain 975). Subsequent to this, there have been two large efforts to isolate S. pombe from fruit, nectar, or fermentations: one by Florenzano et al.[9] in the vineyards of western Sicily, and the other by Gomes et al. (2002) in four regions of southeast Brazil.[10]

Ecology

The fission yeast S. pombe belongs to the divisio Ascomycota, which represents the largest and most diverse group of fungi. Free-living ascomycetes are commonly found in tree exudates, on plant roots and in surrounding soil, on ripe and rotting fruits, and in association with insect vectors that transport them between substrates. Many of these associations are symbiotic or saprophytic, although numerous ascomycetes (and their basidiomycete cousins) represent important plant pathogens that target myriad plant species, including commercial crops. Among the ascomycetous yeast genera, the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces is unique because of the deposition of α-(1,3)-glucan or pseudonigeran in the cell wall in addition to the better known β-glucans and the virtual lack of chitin. Species of this genus also differ in mannan composition, which shows terminal d-galactose sugars in the side-chains of their mannans. S. pombe undergo aerobic fermentation in the presence of excess sugar.[11] S. pombe can degrade L malic acid, one of the dominant organic acid in wine, which makes then diverse among other Saccharomyces strain.

Comparison with budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)

The yeast species Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are both extensively studied; these two species diverged approximately 300 to 600 million years before present,[12] and are significant tools in molecular and cellular biology. Some of the technical discriminants between these two species are:

  • S. cerevisiae has approximately 5,600 open reading frames; S. pombe has approximately 4,970 open reading frames.
  • Despite similar gene numbers, S. cerevisiae has only about 250 introns, while S. pombe has nearly 5,000.
  • S. cerevisiae has 16 chromosomes, S. pombe has 3.
  • S. cerevisiae is often diploid while S. pombe is usually haploid.
  • S. pombe has a shelterin-like telomere complex while S. cerevisiae does not.[13]
  • S. cerevisiae is in the G1 phase of the cell cycle for an extended period (as a consequence, G1-S transition is tightly controlled), while S. pombe remains in the G2 phase of the cell cycle for an extended period (as a consequence, G2-M transition is under tight control).
  • Both species share genes with higher eukaryotes that they do not share with each other. S. pombe has RNAi machinery genes like those in vertebrates, while this is missing from S. cerevisiae. S. cerevisiae also has greatly simplified heterochromatin compared to S. pombe.[14] Conversely, S. cerevisiae has well-developed peroxisomes, while S. pombe does not.
  • S. cerevisiae has small point centromere of 125 bp, and sequence-defined replication origins of about the same size. On the converse, S. pombe has large, repetitive centromeres (40–100 kb) more similar to mammalian centromeres, and degenerate replication origins of at least 1kb.

Life cycle

Centrosome of S. pombe.

The fission yeast is a single-celled fungus with simple, fully characterized genome and a rapid growth rate. It has long since been used in brewing, baking, and molecular genetics. S. pombe is a rod-shaped cell, approximately 3 µm in diameter, that grows entirely by elongation at the ends. After mitosis, division occurs by the formation of a septum, or cell plate, that cleaves the cell at its midpoint.

The central events of cell reproduction are chromosome duplication, which takes place in S (Synthetic) phase, followed by chromosome segregation and nuclear division (mitosis) and cell division (cytokinesis), which are collectively called M (Mitotic) phase.G1 is the gap between M and S phases, and G2 is the gap between S and M phases. In the budding yeast, the G1 phase is particularly extended, and cytokinesis (daughter-cell segregation) does not happen until a new S (Synthetic) phase is launched.

Fission yeast governs mitosis by mechanisms that are similar to those in multicellular animals. It normally proliferates in a haploid state. When starved, cells of opposite mating types (P and M) fuse to form a diploid zygote that immediately enters meiosis to generate four haploid spores. When conditions improve, these spores germinate to produce proliferating haploid cells.[15]

Cytokinesis in fission yeast

Cytokinesis of the fission yeast.
Cytokinesis of the fission yeast.

The general features of cytokinesis are shown here. The site of cell division is determined before anaphase. The anaphase spindle (in green on the figure) is then positioned so that the segregated chromosomes are on opposite sides of the predetermined cleavage plane.

Size control in fission yeast

Cell-cycle length of the fission yeast depends on nutrient conditions.
Cell-cycle length of the fission yeast depends on nutrient conditions.

In fission yeast, where growth governs progression through G2/M, a wee1 mutation causes entry into mitosis at an abnormally small size, resulting in a shorter G2. G1 is lengthened, suggesting that progression through Start (beginning of cell cycle) is responsive to growth when the G2/M control is lost. Furthermore, cells in poor nutrient conditions grow slowly and therefore take longer to double in size and divide. Low nutrient levels also reset the growth threshold so that cell progresses through the cell cycle at a smaller size. Upon exposure to stressful conditions [heat (40 °C) or the oxidizing agent hydrogen peroxide] S. pombe cells undergo aging as measured by increased cell division time and increased probability of cell death.[16] Finally, wee1 mutant fission yeast cells are smaller than wild-type cells, but take just as long to go through the cell cycle. This is possible because small yeast cells grow slower, that is, their added total mass per unit time is smaller than that of normal cells.

A spatial gradient is thought to coordinate cell size and mitotic entry in fission yeast.[17][18][19] The Pom1 protein kinase (green) is localized to the cell cortex, with the highest concentration at the cell tips. The cell-cycle regulators Cdr2, Cdr1 and Wee1 are present in cortical nodes in the middle of the cell (blue and red dots). a, In small cells, the Pom1 gradient reaches most of the cortical nodes (blue dots). Pom1 inhibits Cdr2, preventing Cdr2 and Cdr1 from inhibiting Wee1, and allowing Wee1 to phosphorylate Cdk1, thus inactivating cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity and preventing entry into mitosis. b, In long cells, the Pom1 gradient does not reach the cortical nodes (red dots), and therefore Cdr2 and Cdr1 remain active in the nodes. Cdr2 and Cdr1 inhibit Wee1, preventing phosphorylation of Cdk1 and thereby leading to activation of CDK and mitotic entry. (This simplified diagram omits several other regulators of CDK activity.)

Mating-type switching in fission yeast

Fission yeast switches mating type by a replication-coupled recombination event, which takes place during S phase of the cell cycle. Fission yeast uses intrinsic asymmetry of the DNA replication process to switch the mating type; it was the first system where the direction of replication was shown to be required for the change of the cell type. Studies of the mating-type switching system lead to a discovery and characterization of a site-specific replication termination site RTS1, a site-specific replication pause site MPS1, and a novel type of chromosomal imprint, marking one of the sister chromatids at the mating-type locus mat1. In addition, work on the silenced donor region has led to great advances in understanding formation and maintenance of heterochromatin.[20]

Responses to DNA damage

Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a facultative sexual microorganism that can undergo mating when nutrients are limiting.[21] Exposure of S. pombe to hydrogen peroxide, an agent that causes oxidative stress leading to oxidative DNA damage, strongly induces mating and formation of meiotic spores.[22] This finding suggests that meiosis, and particularly meiotic recombination, may be an adaptation for repairing DNA damage.[23][24] Supporting this view is the finding that single base lesions of the type dU:dG in the DNA of S. pombe stimulate meiotic recombination.[25] This recombination requires uracil-DNA glycosylase, an enzyme that removes uracil from the DNA backbone and initiates base excision repair. On the basis of this finding, it was proposed that base excision repair of either a uracil base, an abasic site, or a single-strand nick is sufficient to initiate recombination in S. pombe.[25] Other experiments with S. pombe indicated that faulty processing of DNA replication intermediates, i.e. Okazaki fragments, causes DNA damages such as single-strand nicks or gaps, and that these stimulate meiotic recombination.[26]

Fission yeast as a model system

Fission yeast has become a notable model system to study basic principles of a cell that can be used to understand more complex organisms like mammals and in particular humans.[27][28] This single cell eukaryote is nonpathogenic and easily grown and manipulated in the lab.[29][30] Fission yeast contains one of the smallest numbers of genes of a known genome sequence for a eukaryote, and has only three chromosomes in its genome.[31] Many of the genes responsible for cell division and cellular organization in fission yeast cell are also found in the human’s genome.[29][30][32] Cell cycle regulation and division are crucial for growth and development of any cell. Fission yeast’s conserved genes has been heavily studied and the reason for many recent biomedical developments.[33][34] Fission yeast is also a practical model system to observe cell division because fission yeast’s are cylindrically shaped single celled eukaryotes that divide and reproduce by medial fission.[29] This can easily be seen using microscopy. Fission yeast also have an extremely short generation time, 2 to 4 hours, which also makes it an easy model system to observe and grow in the laboratory [30] Fission yeast’s simplicity in genomic structure yet similarities with mammalian genome, ease of ability to manipulate, and ability to be used for drug analysis is why fission yeast is making many contributions to biomedicine and cellular biology research, and a model system for genetic analysis.[30][35][36][37][38]

Genome

Schizosaccharomyces pombe is often used to study cell division and growth because of conserved genomic regions also seen in human including: heterochromatin proteins, large origins of replication, large centromeres, conserved cellular checkpoints, telomere function, gene splicing, and many other cellular processes.[31][39][40] S. pombe’s genome was fully sequenced in 2002, the sixth eukaryotic genome to be sequenced as part of the Genome Project [5]. An estimated 4,979 genes were discovered within three chromosomes containing about 14Mb of DNA. This DNA is contained within 3 different chromosomes in the nucleus with gaps in the centromeric (40kb) and telomeric (260kb) regions.[31] After the initial sequencing of the fission yeast’s genome, other previous non-sequenced regions of the genes have been sequenced. Structural and functional analysis of these gene regions can be found on large scale fission yeast databases such as PomBase.[41]

Forty-three percent of the genes in the Genome Project were found to contain introns in 4,739 genes. Fission yeast does not have as many duplicated genes compared to budding yeast, only containing 5%, making fission yeast a great model genome to observe and gives researchers the ability to create more functional research approaches. S. pombe's having a large number of introns gives opportunities for an increase of range of protein types produced from alternative splicing and genes that code for comparable genes in human.[31] 81% of the three centromeres in fission yeast have been sequenced. The lengths of the three centromeres were found to be 34, 65, and 110 kb. This is 300-100 times longer than the centromeres on budding yeast. An extremely high level of conservation (97%) is also seen over 1,780-bp region in the DGS regions of the centromere. This elongation of centromeres and its conservative sequences makes fission yeast a practical model system to use to observe cell division and in humans because of their likeness.[31][42][43]

During the Genomic Project in S.pombe researchers found that 50 genes coded for proteins and/or mutations that linked to human diseases, with nearly half of them (23) being cancer-related.[31] This makes S.pombe a great system to use to study human genes and disease pathways, especially cell cycle and DNA checkpoint systems.[43][44][45][46]

Cell cycle analysis

DNA replication in yeast has been increasingly studied by many researchers. Further understanding of DNA replication, gene expression, and conserved mechanisms in yeast can provide researchers with information on how these systems operate in mammalian cells in general and human cells in particular.[40][47][48][49] Other stages, such as cellular growth and aging, are also observed in yeast in order to understand these mechanisms in more complex systems.[32][50][51][52]

Cytokinesis is one of the components of cell division that is often observed in fission yeast. Well-conserved components of cytokinesis are observed in fission yeast and allow us to look at various genomic scenarios and pinpoint mutations.[45][53][54][54][55] Cytokinesis is a permanent step and very crucial to the wellbeing of the cell.[56] Contractile ring formation in particular is heavily studied by researchers using S.pombe as a model system. The contractile ring is highly conserved in both fission yeast and human cytokinesis.[45] Mutations in cytokinesis can result in many malfunctions of the cell including cell death and development of cancerous cells.[45] This is a complex process in human cell division, but in S.pombe simpler experiments can yield results that can then be applied for research in higher-order model systems such as humans.

One of safely precautions that the cell takes to ensure precise cell division takes place is cell-cycle checkpoint.[57][58] These checkpoints ensure any mutagens are eliminated.[59] This is done often by relay signals that stimulate ubiquitination of the targets and delay cytokinesis.[31] Without mitotic check points such as these, mutagens are created and replicated, resulting in multitudes of cellular issues including cell death or tumorigenesis seen in cancerous cells. Paul Nurse, Leland Hartwell, and Tim Hunt were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2001. They discovered key conserved checkpoints that are crucial for a cell to divide properly. These findings have been linked to cancer and diseased cells and are a notable finding for biomedicine.[60]

Researchers using fission yeast as a model system also look at organelle dynamics and responses and the possible correlations between yeast cells and mammalian cells.[61][62] Mitochondria diseases, and various organelle systems such as the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum, can be further understood, by observing fission yeast’s chromosome dynamics and protein expression levels and regulation.[46][48][63][64][64][65][66]

Biomedical tool

However, there are limitations with using fission yeast as a model system: its multidrug resistance. The MDR response is due to an “overexpression of drug efflux pumps the ATP-binding cassette family and the major facilitator superfamily”.[33] Paul Nurse and some of his colleagues have recently created S.pombe strains sensitive to chemical inhibitors and common probes to see whether it is possible to use fission yeast as a model system of chemical drug research.[33]

For example, Doxorubicin, a very common chemotherapeutic antibiotic, has many adverse side-effects. Researchers are looking for ways to further understand how doxorubicin works by observing the genes linked to resistance by using fission yeast as a model system. Links between doxorubicin adverse side-effects and chromosome metabolism and membrane transport were seen. Metabolic models for drug targeting are now being used in biotechnology, and further advances are expected in the future using the fission yeast model system.[34]

Experimental approaches

Fission yeast is easily accessible, easily grown and manipulated to make mutants, and able to be maintained at either a haploid or diploid state. S. pombe is normally a haploid cell but, when put under stressful conditions, usually nitrogen deficiency, two cells will conjugate to form a diploid that later form four spores within a tetrad ascus.[30] This process is easily visible and observable under any microscope and allows us to look at meiosis in a simpler model system to see how this phenomenon operates.

Virtually any genetics experiment or technique can, therefore, be applied to this model system such as: tetrad dissection, mutagens analysis, transformations, and microscopy techniques such as FRAT and FREP. New models, such as Tug-Of-War (gTOW), are also being used to analyze yeast robustness and observe gene expression. Making knock-in and knock-out genes is fairly easy and with the fission yeast’s genome being sequenced this task is very accessible and well known.[67][68]

See also

References

  1. ^ Wilhelm; et al. (2008). "Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution". Nature. 453 (7199): 1239–1243. doi:10.1038/nature07002.
  2. ^ Leupold, U (1950). "Die Vererbung von Homothallie und Heterothallie bei Schizosaccharomyces pombe". CR Trav Lab Carlsberg Ser Physiol. 24: 381–480.
  3. ^ Leupold U. (1993) The origins of Schizosaccharomyces pombe genetics. In: Hall MN, Linder P. eds. The Early Days of Yeast Genetics . New York. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. p 125–128.
  4. ^ Mitchison, JM (1957). "The growth of single cells. I. Schizosaccharomyces pombe". Exp Cell Res. 13: 244–262. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(57)90005-8.
  5. ^ Mitchison, JM (1990). "My favourite cell: The fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe". BioEssays. 4: 189–191. doi:10.1002/bies.950120409.
  6. ^ Fantes PA; Hoffman CS (2016). "A Brief History of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Research: A Perspective Over the Past 70 Years". Genetics. 203 (2): 621–9. doi:10.1534/genetics.116.189407. PMID 27270696.
  7. ^ Matsuyama; et al. (2006). "ORFeome cloning and global analysis of protein localization in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe". Nature Biotechnology. 24 (7): 841–847. doi:10.1038/nbt1222.
  8. ^ Teoh, Ai Leng (September 2004). "Yeast ecology of Kombucha fermentation". International Journal of Food Microbiology. 95 (2): 119–26. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.12.020. PMID 15282124.
  9. ^ Florenzano; et al. (1977). "Contributo alla ecologia dei lieviti Schizosaccharomyces sulle uve". Vitis. 16: 38–44.
  10. ^ Gómez; et al. (2002). "Fission yeast enters a joyful new era". Genome Biol. 3 (6): 4017. doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-6-reports4017.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  11. ^ Lin; et al. (2011). "The evolution of aerobic fermentation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe was associated with regulatory reprogramming but not nucleosome reorganization". Mol Biol Evol. 28 (4): 1407–13. doi:10.1093/molbev/msq324.
  12. ^ Douzery, E. J. P.; Snell, E. A; Bapteste, E.; Delsuc, F.; Philippe, H. (2004). "The timing of eukaryotic evolution: does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils?". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101 (43): 15386–15391. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403984101.
  13. ^ Price CM, Boltz KA, Chaiken MF, Stewart JA, Beilstein MA, Shippen DE (2010). "Evolution of CST function in telomere maintenance". Cell Cycle (journal). 9 (16): 3157–3165. doi:10.4161/cc.9.16.12547. PMC 3041159. PMID 20697207.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ Grunstein, Michael, and Susan Gasser. "Epigenetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae." Epigenetics. 1. Cold Spring Harbor Press, 2007.
  15. ^ Cell Cycle. Principles of Control" by David O Morgan, Primers in Biology
  16. ^ Coelho M, Dereli A, Haese A, et al. (October 2013). "Fission Yeast Does Not Age under Favorable Conditions, but Does So after Stress". Curr. Biol. 23 (19): 1844–52. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.084. PMID 24035542.
  17. ^ A spatial gradient coordinates cell size and mitotic entry in fission yeast by James B. Moseley, Adeline Mayeux, Anne Paoletti & Paul Nurse, Nature, 11 June 2009
  18. ^ Polar gradients of the DYRK-family kinase Pom1 couple cell length with the cell cycle. Sophie G Martin and Martine Berthelot-Grosjean. Nature. 2009
  19. ^ Sawin, Kenneth E. (2009). "Cell cycle: Cell division brought down to size". Nature. 459 (7248): 782–783. doi:10.1038/459782a.
  20. ^ Lessons learned from studies of fission yeast mating-type switching and silencing by Amar J.S. Klar, Annual Review of Genetics, 5 July 2007
  21. ^ Davey J (December 1998). "Fusion of a fission yeast". Yeast. 14 (16): 1529–66. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199812)14:16<1529::AID-YEA357>3.0.CO;2-0. PMID 9885154.
  22. ^ Bernstein C; Johns V (April 1989). "Sexual reproduction as a response to H2O2 damage in Schizosaccharomyces pombe". J. Bacteriol. 171 (4): 1893–7. PMC 209837. PMID 2703462.
  23. ^ Bernstein H and Bernstein C (2013). Evolutionary Origin and Adaptive Function of Meiosis. “Meiosis,” Dr. Carol Bernstein (Ed.), ISBN 978-953-51-1197-9, InTech, http://www.intechopen.com/books/meiosis/evolutionary-origin-and-adaptive-function-of-meiosis
  24. ^ Elvira Hörandl (2013). Meiosis and the Paradox of Sex in Nature, Meiosis, Dr. Carol Bernstein (Ed.), ISBN 978-953-51-1197-9, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/56542. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/meiosis/meiosis-and-the-paradox-of-sex-in-nature
  25. ^ a b Pauklin S, Burkert JS, Martin J, et al. (May 2009). "Alternative induction of meiotic recombination from single-base lesions of DNA deaminases". Genetics. 182 (1): 41–54. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.101683. PMC 2674839. PMID 19237686.
  26. ^ Farah JA; Cromie G; Davis L; Steiner WW; Smith GR (December 2005). "Activation of an alternative, rec12 (spo11)-independent pathway of fission yeast meiotic recombination in the absence of a DNA flap endonuclease". Genetics. 171 (4): 1499–511. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.046821. PMC 1456079. PMID 16118186.
  27. ^ Forsburg, S. L. (Jun 2005). "The yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe: models for cell biology research". Gravit Space Biol Bull. 18 (2): 3–9. PMID 16038088.
  28. ^ Forsburg, Susan L; Rhind, Nicholas (February 2006). "Basic methods for fission yeast". Yeast. 23 (3): 173–183. doi:10.1002/yea.1347.
  29. ^ a b c Wixon, Jo (2002). "Featured Organism: Schizosaccharomyces pombe, The Fission Yeast". Comparative and Functional Genomics. 3 (2): 194–204. doi:10.1002/cfg.92.
  30. ^ a b c d e Forsburg, Susan L. "PombeNet". Retrieved 7 February 2016.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g Wood, V.; Gwilliam, R.; Rajandream, M. A.; Lyne, M.; Lyne, R.; Stewart, A.; Sgouros, J.; Peat, N.; Hayles, J.; Baker, S.; et al. (21 February 2002). "The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe". Nature. 415 (6874): 871–880. doi:10.1038/nature724. PMID 11859360.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  32. ^ a b Das, M. (2007). "Regulation of Cell Diameter, For3p Localization, and Cell Symmetry by Fission Yeast Rho-GAP Rga4p". Molecular Biology of the Cell. 18 (6): 2090–2101. doi:10.1091/mbc.E06-09-0883.
  33. ^ a b c Kawashima, Shigehiro A.; Takemoto, Ai; Nurse, Paul; Kapoor, Tarun M. (July 2012). "Analyzing Fission Yeast Multidrug Resistance Mechanisms to Develop a Genetically Tractable Model System for Chemical Biology". Chemistry & Biology. 19 (7): 893–901. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.008.
  34. ^ a b Tay, Zoey; Eng, Ru Jun; Sajiki, Kenichi; Lim, Kim Kiat; Tang, Ming Yi; Yanagida, Mitsuhiro; Chen, Ee Sin; Mata, Juan (24 January 2013). "Cellular Robustness Conferred by Genetic Crosstalk Underlies Resistance against Chemotherapeutic Drug Doxorubicin in Fission Yeast". PLoS ONE. 8 (1): e55041. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055041.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  35. ^ Davey, John (December 1998). "Fusion of a fission yeast". Yeast. 14 (16): 1529–1566. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199812)14:16<1529::AID-YEA357>3.0.CO;2-0. PMID 9885154.
  36. ^ Forsburg, Susan L (2006). "Basic methods for fission yeast". Yeast. 23 (3): 173–183. doi:10.1002/yea.1347.
  37. ^ Forsburg, S. L. (Sep 1999). "The best yeast?". Trends Genet. 15 (9): 340–4. doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(99)01798-9. PMID 10461200.
  38. ^ Hoffman CS; Wood V; Fantes PA. (Oct 2015). "An Ancient Yeast for Young Geneticists: A Primer on the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Model System". Genetics. 201 (2): 403–23. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.181503. PMC 4596657. PMID 26447128.
  39. ^ Sabatinos, S. A.; Mastro, T. L.; Green, M. D.; Forsburg, S. L. (12 November 2012). "A Mammalian-Like DNA Damage Response of Fission Yeast to Nucleoside Analogs". Genetics. 193 (1): 143–157. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.145730.
  40. ^ a b Hayano, M.; Kanoh, Y.; Matsumoto, S.; Renard-Guillet, C.; Shirahige, K.; Masai, H. (25 January 2012). "Rif1 is a global regulator of timing of replication origin firing in fission yeast". Genes & Development. 26 (2): 137–150. doi:10.1101/gad.178491.111.
  41. ^ "PomBase Series Edition". The EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute. Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Place Published: Hinxton, Cambridge.
  42. ^ Burrack, Laura S.; Berman, Judith (22 June 2012). "Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres". Chromosome Research. 20 (5): 607–619. doi:10.1007/s10577-012-9296-x.
  43. ^ a b Stimpson, Kaitlin M.; Matheny, Justyne E.; Sullivan, Beth A. (17 July 2012). "Dicentric chromosomes: unique models to study centromere function and inactivation". Chromosome Research. 20 (5): 595–605. doi:10.1007/s10577-012-9302-3.
  44. ^ Kadura, Sheila; Sazer, Shelley (July 2005). "SAC-ing mitotic errors: How the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) plays defense against chromosome mis-segregation". Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 61 (3): 145–160. doi:10.1002/cm.20072.
  45. ^ a b c d Lee, I-Ju; Coffman, Valerie C.; Wu, Jian-Qiu (October 2012). "Contractile-ring assembly in fission yeast cytokinesis: Recent advances and new perspectives". Cytoskeleton. 69 (10): 751–763. doi:10.1002/cm.21052.
  46. ^ a b Teresa, Rinaldi; Dallabona, Cristina; Ferrero, Ileana; Frontali, Laura; Bolotin-Fukuhara, Monique (2010). "Mitochondrial diseases and the role of the yeast models". FEMS Yeast Research. 10 (8): 1006–1022. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00685.x.
  47. ^ Mojardín, Laura; Vázquez, Enrique; Antequera, Francisco (November 2013). "Specification of DNA Replication Origins and Genomic Base Composition in Fission Yeasts". Journal of Molecular Biology. 425 (23): 4706–4713. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.09.023.
  48. ^ a b Forsburg, S. L. (Apr 2002). "Only connect: linking meiotic DNA replication to chromosome dynamics". Mol Cell. 9 (4): 703–11. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00508-7. PMID 11983163.
  49. ^ Moriya, Hisao; Chino, Ayako; Kapuy, Orsolya; Csikász-Nagy, Attila; Novák, Béla (6 December 2011). "Overexpression limits of fission yeast cell-cycle regulators in vivo and in silico". Molecular Systems Biology. 7 (1): 556. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.91.
  50. ^ Das, Maitreyi; Wiley, David J.; Chen, Xi; Shah, Kavita; Verde, Fulvia (August 2009). "The Conserved NDR Kinase Orb6 Controls Polarized Cell Growth by Spatial Regulation of the Small GTPase Cdc42". Current Biology. 19 (15): 1314–1319. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.057.
  51. ^ Moseley, James B. (October 2013). "Cellular Aging: Symmetry Evades Senescence". Current Biology. 23 (19): R871–R873. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.013. PMID 24112980.
  52. ^ Cooper, S. (2013). "Schizosaccharomyces pombe grows exponentially during the division cycle with no rate change points". FEMS Yeast Res.
  53. ^ Cadou, Angela (2013). "The Kin1 kinase and the calcineurin phosphatase cooperate to link actin ring assembly and septum synthesis in fission yeast". Biology of the Cell. 105 (3): 129–148. doi:10.1111/boc.201200042.
  54. ^ a b Cadou, Angela; Couturier, Anne; Le Goff, Cathy; Xie, Linfeng; Paulson, James R.; Le Goff, Xavier (March 2013). "The Kin1 kinase and the calcineurin phosphatase cooperate to link actin ring assembly and septum synthesis in fission yeast". Biology of the Cell. 105 (3): 129–148. doi:10.1111/boc.201200042.
  55. ^ Balazs, Anita; Batta, Gyula; Miklos, Ida; Acs-Szabo, Lajos; Vazquez de Aldana, Carlos R.; Sipiczki, Matthias (March 2012). "Conserved regulators of the cell separation process in Schizosaccharomyces". Fungal Genetics and Biology. 49 (3): 235–249. doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2012.01.003.
  56. ^ Rincon, Sergio A.; Paoletti, Anne (October 2012). "Mid1/anillin and the spatial regulation of cytokinesis in fission yeast". Cytoskeleton. 69 (10): 764–777. doi:10.1002/cm.21056.
  57. ^ Das, M (2010). "Microtubule-dependent spatial organization of mitochondria in fission yeast Journal". Methods Cell BIo. 97: 203–21. doi:10.1016/S0091-679X(10)97012-X. PMID 20719273.
  58. ^ Fraser, Hunter B (2013). "Cell-cycle regulated transcription associates with DNA replication timing in yeast and human". Genome Biology. 14 (10): R111. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r111.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  59. ^ Li. C. Green; M. D. Forsburg; S. L. (2013). "Mutations disrupting histone methylation have different effects on replication timing in S. pombe centromere". PLoS ONE. 8 (4): e61464. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061464. PMC 3641051. PMID 23658693.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  60. ^ "Sir Paul Nurse - Biographical". The Official Site of the Nobel Prize. 2001. Retrieved 7 February 2016.
  61. ^ Zhao J; Lendahl U; Nistér M. (2012). "Regulation of mitochondrial dynamics: convergences and divergences between yeast and vertebrates". J Biomed Biotechnol. 70 (6): 951–76. doi:10.1007/s00018-012-1066-6.
  62. ^ Abelovska, Lenka (2011). "Mitochondria as protean organelles: membrane processes that influence mitochondrial shape in yeast". General physiology and biophysics. 30 (05): 13–24. doi:10.4149/gpb_2011_SI1_13.
  63. ^ Chino, Ayako; Makanae, Koji; Moriya, Hisao; Bähler, Jürg (3 September 2013). "Relationships between Cell Cycle Regulator Gene Copy Numbers and Protein Expression Levels in Schizosaccharomyces pombe". PLoS ONE. 8 (9): e73319. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073319.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  64. ^ a b Raychaudhuri, Sumana; Young, Barry P; Espenshade, Peter J; Loewen, Christopher JR (August 2012). "Regulation of lipid metabolism: a tale of two yeasts". Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 24 (4): 502–508. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2012.05.006.
  65. ^ Babu, Mohan; Vlasblom, James; Pu, Shuye; Guo, Xinghua; Graham, Chris; Bean, Björn D. M.; Burston, Helen E.; Vizeacoumar, Franco J.; Snider, Jamie; Phanse, Sadhna; Fong, Vincent; Tam, Yuen Yi C.; Davey, Michael; Hnatshak, Olha; Bajaj, Navgeet; Chandran, Shamanta; Punna, Thanuja; Christopolous, Constantine; Wong, Victoria; Yu, Analyn; Zhong, Gouqing; Li, Joyce; Stagljar, Igor; Conibear, Elizabeth; Wodak, Shoshana J.; Emili, Andrew; Greenblatt, Jack F. (2 September 2012). "Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae". Nature. 489 (7417): 585–589. doi:10.1038/nature11354.
  66. ^ Suda, Yasuyuki (2011). "The Yeast Golgi Apparatus". Traffic. 13 (4): 505–510. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01316.x. PMID 22132734.
  67. ^ "Trans-NIH.pombe Initiative". 2002. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  68. ^ Green, M. D. Sabatinos, S. A. Forsburg, S. L. (2009). "Microscopy techniques to examine DNA replication in fission yeast Journal". Methods Mol Biol. 521: 463–82. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-815-7_26. PMID 19563123.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schizosaccharomyces_pombe&oldid=748808309"