Sextus Roscius

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Sextus Roscius (often referred to as Sextus Roscius the Younger to differentiate him from his father) was a Roman citizen farmer during the latter days of the Roman Republic. In 80 BC, he was tried in Rome for patricide and was successfully defended by the 27-year old Cicero in the extant Pro Roscio Amerino, his first major litigation. The case involved some risk for Cicero, since he accused Lucius Cornelius Chrysogonus, a freedman of Sulla, dictator of Rome the previous year of the trial, of corruption and involvement in the crime.

Sheltered by Caecilia[edit]

The Family Tree of Caecilia the Priestess

Before the trial, Roscius was sheltered by Caecilia,[1] probably Caecilia Metella Balearica, a former Vestal Virgin by this time (since she had her own house). Caecilia was a relative of Sulla's wife Caecilia Metella Dalmatica, and had powerful connections among the Roman elite; her intercession for the young Julius Caesar saved his life and political career. In 80 BC, the Metelli family were staunchly in Sulla's court. Her brother was Quintus Caecilius Metellus Nepos, a former consul whose stepdaughter, Mucia Tertia, was wife of Pompey. Her cousins included Quintus Caecilius Metellus Numidicus Pius, chief ally of Sulla. Her widowed brother-in-law was Appius Claudius Pulcher, another Sulla ally, who had been Praetor in 88 BC.

Trial[edit]

Sextus Roscius was accused of patricide, killing his own father, Sextus Roscius senior, who was murdered in Rome streets after a dinner.

Cicero was a native to the Roman countryside, and Sextus Roscius was a country man from Ameria who was accused with the murder of his father even though he was not in the Rome at the time of the murder. Because senior Sextus was in proscription list, his properties were taken by the government and sold at an auction and his son was accused of his murder. Erucius, the prosecutor, argued that the accused must have hired someone else "to do the deed for him", without naming alternatives murder suspects.[2] Also, brought to testify two relatives of the deceased and councilmen in Ameria, T. Roscius Capito, and T. Roscius Magnus. Cicero's first major litigation, he turned the trial around by accusing Sulla of murdering the father for political gains.[3] Although the argument for the defensed could be easily overturned and doubtful by today standards.

Cicero argued that those who chose to align themselves with Chrysogonus in the belief that they were supporting the nobility were wrong to do so, since his corruption was a stain on the Republic. "For the cause will be rendered more splendid by resisting every worthless man. The worthless favourers of Chrysogonus, who think that his cause and theirs are identical, are injured themselves by separating themselves from such splendor." [4]

Eventually, Sextus the younger was acquitted of the murder charges but never repossessed his land.

In popular culture[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Oration for Sextus Roscius of Ameria "Caecilia, the sister of Nepos, the daughter of Balearicus"
  2. ^ https://www.uvm.edu/~bsaylor/latin/RosciusCommIntro.pdf
  3. ^ Boatwright, Mary T.; Gargola, Daniel J.; Talbert, Richard J. A. (2004-02-26). The Romans: From Village to Empire. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 9780195118759. 
  4. ^ "M. Tullius Cicero, For Sextus Roscius of Ameria, section 142". www.perseus.tufts.edu. p. 142. Retrieved 2015-12-06. 
  5. ^ "Cicero - Big Finish Audiobooks - Big Finish". www.bigfinish.com. Retrieved 2017-09-02.