Slowly changing dimension
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Dimensions in data management and data warehousing contain relatively static data about such entities as geographical locations, customers, or products. Data captured by Slowly Changing Dimensions (SCDs) change slowly but unpredictably, rather than according to a regular schedule.
Some scenarios can cause Referential integrity problems.
For example, a database may contain a fact table that stores sales records. This fact table would be linked to dimensions by means of foreign keys. One of these dimensions may contain data about the company's salespeople: e.g., the regional offices in which they work. However, the salespeople are sometimes transferred from one regional office to another. For historical sales reporting purposes it may be necessary to keep a record of the fact that a particular sales person had been assigned to a particular regional office at an earlier date, whereas that sales person is now assigned to a different regional office.
Dealing with these issues involves SCD management methodologies referred to as Type 0 through 6. Type 6 SCDs are also sometimes called Hybrid SCDs.
- 1 Type 0: retain original
- 2 Type 1: overwrite
- 3 Type 2: add new row
- 4 Type 3: add new attribute
- 5 Type 4: add history table
- 6 Type 6: hybrid
- 7 Type 2 / type 6 fact implementation
- 8 Combining types
- 9 See also
- 10 Notes
- 11 References
Type 0: retain original
The Type 0 method is passive. It manages dimensional changes and no action is performed. Values remain as they were at the time the dimension record was first inserted. In certain circumstances history is preserved with a Type 0. Higher order types are employed to guarantee the preservation of history whereas Type 0 provides the least or no control. This is rarely used.
Type 1: overwrite
This methodology overwrites old with new data, and therefore does not track historical data.
Example of a supplier table:
|123||ABC||Acme Supply Co||CA|
In the above example, Supplier_Code is the natural key and Supplier_Key is a surrogate key. Technically, the surrogate key is not necessary, since the row will be unique by the natural key (Supplier_Code). However, to optimize performance on joins use integer rather than character keys (unless the number of bytes in the character key is less than the number of bytes in the integer key).
If the supplier relocates the headquarters to Illinois the record would be overwritten:
|123||ABC||Acme Supply Co||IL|
The disadvantage of the Type 1 method is that there is no history in the data warehouse. It has the advantage however that it's easy to maintain.
If one has calculated an aggregate table summarizing facts by state, it will need to be recalculated when the Supplier_State is changed.
Type 2: add new row
This method tracks historical data by creating multiple records for a given natural key in the dimensional tables with separate surrogate keys and/or different version numbers. Unlimited history is preserved for each insert.
For example, if the supplier relocates to Illinois the version numbers will be incremented sequentially:
|123||ABC||Acme Supply Co||CA||0|
|124||ABC||Acme Supply Co||IL||1|
Another method is to add 'effective date' columns.
|123||ABC||Acme Supply Co||CA||01-Jan-2000||21-Dec-2004|
|124||ABC||Acme Supply Co||IL||22-Dec-2004||NULL|
The null End_Date in row two indicates the current tuple version. In some cases, a standardized surrogate high date (e.g. 9999-12-31) may be used as an end date, so that the field can be included in an index, and so that null-value substitution is not required when querying.
Transactions that reference a particular surrogate key (Supplier_Key) are then permanently bound to the time slices defined by that row of the slowly changing dimension table. An aggregate table summarizing facts by state continues to reflect the historical state, i.e. the state the supplier was in at the time of the transaction; no update is needed. To reference the entity via the natural key, it is necessary to remove the unique constraint making Referential integrity by DBMS impossible.
If there are retroactive changes made to the contents of the dimension, or if new attributes are added to the dimension (for example a Sales_Rep column) which have different effective dates from those already defined, then this can result in the existing transactions needing to be updated to reflect the new situation. This can be an expensive database operation, so Type 2 SCDs are not a good choice if the dimensional model is subject to change.
Type 3: add new attribute
This method tracks changes using separate columns and preserves limited history. The Type 3 preserves limited history as it is limited to the number of columns designated for storing historical data. The original table structure in Type 1 and Type 2 is the same but Type 3 adds additional columns. In the following example, an additional column has been added to the table to record the supplier's original state - only the previous history is stored.
|123||ABC||Acme Supply Co||CA||22-Dec-2004||IL|
This record contains a column for the original state and current state—cannot track the changes if the supplier relocates a second time.
One variation of this is to create the field Previous_Supplier_State instead of Original_Supplier_State which would track only the most recent historical change.
Type 4: add history table
The Type 4 method is usually referred to as using "history tables", where one table keeps the current data, and an additional table is used to keep a record of some or all changes. Both the surrogate keys are referenced in the Fact table to enhance query performance.
For the above example the original table name is Supplier and the history table is Supplier_History.
|124||ABC||Acme & Johnson Supply Co||IL|
|123||ABC||Acme Supply Co||CA||14-June-2003|
|124||ABC||Acme & Johnson Supply Co||IL||22-Dec-2004|
This method resembles how database audit tables and change data capture techniques function.
Type 6: hybrid
The Type 6 method combines the approaches of types 1, 2 and 3 (1 + 2 + 3 = 6). One possible explanation of the origin of the term was that it was coined by Ralph Kimball during a conversation with Stephen Pace from Kalido. Ralph Kimball calls this method "Unpredictable Changes with Single-Version Overlay" in The Data Warehouse Toolkit.
The Supplier table starts out with one record for our example supplier:
|123||1||ABC||Acme Supply Co||CA||CA||01-Jan-2000||31-Dec-2009||Y|
The Current_State and the Historical_State are the same. The optional Current_Flag attribute indicates that this is the current or most recent record for this supplier.
When Acme Supply Company moves to Illinois, we add a new record, as in Type 2 processing, however a row key is included to ensure we have a unique key for each row:
|123||1||ABC||Acme Supply Co||IL||CA||01-Jan-2000||21-Dec-2004||N|
|123||2||ABC||Acme Supply Co||IL||IL||22-Dec-2004||31-Dec-2009||Y|
We overwrite the Current_Flag information in the first record (Row_Key = 1) with the new information, as in Type 1 processing. We create a new record to track the changes, as in Type 2 processing. And we store the history in a second State column (Historical_State), which incorporates Type 3 processing.
For example, if the supplier were to relocate again, we would add another record to the Supplier dimension, and we would overwrite the contents of the Current_State column:
|123||1||ABC||Acme Supply Co||NY||CA||01-Jan-2000||21-Dec-2004||N|
|123||2||ABC||Acme Supply Co||NY||IL||22-Dec-2004||03-Feb-2008||N|
|123||3||ABC||Acme Supply Co||NY||NY||04-Feb-2008||31-Dec-2009||Y|
Note that, for the current record (Current_Flag = 'Y'), the Current_State and the Historical_State are always the same.
Type 2 / type 6 fact implementation
Type 2 surrogate key with type 3 attribute
In many Type 2 and Type 6 SCD implementations, the surrogate key from the dimension is put into the fact table in place of the natural key when the fact data is loaded into the data repository. The surrogate key is selected for a given fact record based on its effective date and the Start_Date and End_Date from the dimension table. This allows the fact data to be easily joined to the correct dimension data for the corresponding effective date.
Here is the Supplier table as we created it above using Type 6 Hybrid methodology:
|123||ABC||Acme Supply Co||NY||CA||01-Jan-2000||21-Dec-2004||N|
|124||ABC||Acme Supply Co||NY||IL||22-Dec-2004||03-Feb-2008||N|
|125||ABC||Acme Supply Co||NY||NY||04-Feb-2008||31-Dec-9999||Y|
Once the Delivery table contains the correct Supplier_Key, it can easily be joined to the Supplier table using that key. The following SQL retrieves, for each fact record, the current supplier state and the state the supplier was located in at the time of the delivery:
SELECT delivery.delivery_cost, supplier.supplier_name, supplier.historical_state, supplier.current_state FROM delivery INNER JOIN supplier ON delivery.supplier_key = supplier.supplier_key
Pure type 6 implementation
Having a Type 2 surrogate key for each time slice can cause problems if the dimension is subject to change.
A pure Type 6 implementation does not use this, but uses a Surrogate Key for each master data item (e.g. each unique supplier has a single surrogate key).
This avoids any changes in the master data having an impact on the existing transaction data.
It also allows more options when querying the transactions.
Here is the Supplier table using the pure Type 6 methodology:
|456||ABC||Acme Supply Co||CA||01-Jan-2000||21-Dec-2004|
|456||ABC||Acme Supply Co||IL||22-Dec-2004||03-Feb-2008|
|456||ABC||Acme Supply Co||NY||04-Feb-2008||31-Dec-9999|
The following example shows how the query must be extended to ensure a single supplier record is retrieved for each transaction.
SELECT supplier.supplier_code, supplier.supplier_state FROM supplier INNER JOIN delivery ON supplier.supplier_key = delivery.supplier_key AND delivery.delivery_date BETWEEN supplier.start_date AND supplier.end_date
A fact record with an effective date (Delivery_Date) of August 9, 2001 will be linked to Supplier_Code of ABC, with a Supplier_State of 'CA'. A fact record with an effective date of October 11, 2007 will also be linked to the same Supplier_Code ABC, but with a Supplier_State of 'IL'.
Whilst more complex, there are a number of advantages of this approach, including:
- Referential integrity by DBMS is now possible, but one cannot use Supplier_Code as foreign key on Product table and using Supplier_Key as foreign key each product is tied on specific time slice.
- If there is more than one date on the fact (e.g. Order Date, Delivery Date, Invoice Payment Date) one can choose which date to use for a query.
- You can do "as at now", "as at transaction time" or "as at a point in time" queries by changing the date filter logic.
- You don't need to reprocess the Fact table if there is a change in the dimension table (e.g. adding additional fields retrospectively which change the time slices, or if one makes a mistake in the dates on the dimension table one can correct them easily).
- You can introduce bi-temporal dates in the dimension table.
- You can join the fact to the multiple versions of the dimension table to allow reporting of the same information with different effective dates, in the same query.
The following example shows how a specific date such as '2012-01-01 00:00:00' (which could be the current datetime) can be used.
SELECT supplier.supplier_code, supplier.supplier_state FROM supplier INNER JOIN delivery ON supplier.supplier_key = delivery.supplier_key AND '2012-01-01 00:00:00' BETWEEN supplier.start_date AND supplier.end_date
Both surrogate and natural key
- the primary effective date on the fact record (above),
- the most recent or current information,
- any other date associated with the fact record.
This method allows more flexible links to the dimension, even if one has used the Type 2 approach instead of Type 6.
Here is the Supplier table as we might have created it using Type 2 methodology:
|123||ABC||Acme Supply Co||CA||01-Jan-2000||21-Dec-2004||N|
|124||ABC||Acme Supply Co||IL||22-Dec-2004||03-Feb-2008||N|
|125||ABC||Acme Supply Co||NY||04-Feb-2008||31-Dec-9999||Y|
The following SQL retrieves the most current Supplier_Name and Supplier_State for each fact record:
SELECT delivery.delivery_cost, supplier.supplier_name, supplier.supplier_state FROM delivery INNER JOIN supplier ON delivery.supplier_code = supplier.supplier_code WHERE supplier.current_flag = 'Y'
If there are multiple dates on the fact record, the fact can be joined to the dimension using another date instead of the primary effective date. For instance, the Delivery table might have a primary effective date of Delivery_Date, but might also have an Order_Date associated with each record.
The following SQL retrieves the correct Supplier_Name and Supplier_State for each fact record based on the Order_Date:
SELECT delivery.delivery_cost, supplier.supplier_name, supplier.supplier_state FROM delivery INNER JOIN supplier ON delivery.supplier_code = supplier.supplier_code AND delivery.order_date BETWEEN supplier.start_date AND supplier.end_date
- Referential integrity by DBMS is not possible since there is not a unique to create the relationship.
- If relationship is made with surrogate to solve problem above then one ends with entity tied to a specific time slice.
- If the join query is not written correctly, it may return duplicate rows and/or give incorrect answers.
- The date comparison might not perform well.
- Some Business Intelligence tools do not handle generating complex joins well.
- The ETL processes needed to create the dimension table needs to be carefully designed to ensure that there are no overlaps in the time periods for each distinct item of reference data.
- Many of problems above can be solved using the mixed diagram of an scd model below.
Different SCD Types can be applied to different columns of a table. For example, we can apply Type 1 to the Supplier_Name column and Type 2 to the Supplier_State column of the same table.
- Kimball, Ralph; Ross, Margy. The Data Warehouse Toolkit: The Complete Guide to Dimensional Modeling.
- Ross, Margy; Kimball, Ralph (March 1, 2005). "Slowly Changing Dimensions Are Not Always as Easy as 1, 2, 3". Intelligent Enterprise.