Stirling number
In mathematics, Stirling numbers arise in a variety of combinatorics problems. They are named after James Stirling, who introduced them in the 18th century. Two different sets of numbers bear this name: the Stirling numbers of the first kind and the Stirling numbers of the second kind.
Notation
Several different notations for the Stirling numbers are in use. Stirling numbers of the first kind are written with a small s, and those of the second kind with a large S:
The notation of using brackets and braces, in analogy to the binomial coefficients, was introduced in 1935 by Jovan Karamata and promoted later by Donald Knuth; it is referred to as Karamata notation.
Stirling numbers of the first kind
In combinatorial mathematics, unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind
(with a lower-case "s") count the number of permutations of n elements with k disjoint cycles.
Stirling numbers of the first kind (without the qualifying adjective unsigned) are the coefficients in the expansion
where (x)n is the rising factorial
Stirling numbers of the first kind are sometimes written with the alternate notation
The definition can be inverted to express the falling factorial as a power series:
Similar relationships involving the Stirling numbers hold for the Bernoulli polynomials. Many relations for the Stirling numbers shadow similar relations on the binomial coefficients. The study of these 'shadow relationships' is termed umbral calculus and culminates in the theory of Sheffer sequences.
Table of values
Below is a table of values for the Stirling numbers of the first kind, similar in form to Pascal's triangle:
n \ k | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
0 | 1 | |||||||||
1 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||
2 | 0 | -1 | 1 | |||||||
3 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 1 | ||||||
4 | 0 | -6 | 11 | -6 | 1 | |||||
5 | 0 | 24 | -50 | 35 | -10 | 1 | ||||
6 | 0 | -120 | 274 | -225 | 85 | -15 | 1 | |||
7 | 0 | 720 | -1764 | 1624 | -735 | 175 | -21 | 1 | ||
8 | 0 | -5040 | 13068 | -13132 | 6769 | -1960 | 322 | -28 | 1 | |
9 | 0 | 40320 | -109584 | 118124 | -67284 | 22449 | -4536 | 546 | -36 | 1 |
Recurrence relation
The Stirling numbers of the first kind obey the recurrence relation
for , with the initial conditions
The above follows from the recurrence relation on the falling factorials:
Simple identities
Note that
and
and
Other relations include
and where is a harmonic number and
where is a generalized harmonic number. A generalization of this relation th harmonic numbers is given in a later section.
Generating function
A variety of identities may be derived by manipulating the generating function
In particular, the order of summation may be exchanged, and derivatives taken, and then t or x may be fixed.
Finite sums
A simple sum is
Infinite sums
Some infinite sums include
which holds for .
Relation to harmonic numbers
Stirling numbers of the first kind can be expressed in terms of the harmonic numbers as follows:
where and
In the above, is the Gamma function and is the harmonic number.
Enumerative interpretation.
The absolute value of the Stirling number of the first kind, , counts the number of permutations of objects with exactly orbits (equivalently, with exactly cycles). For example, , corresponds to the fact that the symmetric group on 4 objects has permutations of the form
- — 2 orbits of size 2 each
and permutations of the form
- — 1 orbit of size 3, and 1 orbit of size 1
(see the entry on cycle notation for the meaning of the above expressions.)
Let us prove this. First, we can remark that the unsigned Stirling numbers of the first are characterized by the following recurrence relation:
To see why the above recurrence relation matches the count of permutations with cycles, consider forming a permutation of objects from a permutation of objects by adding a distinguished object. There are exactly two ways in which this can be accomplished. We could do this by forming a singleton cycle, i.e. leaving the extra object alone. This accounts for the term in the recurrence formula. We could also insert the new object into one of the existing cycles. Consider an arbitrary permutation of object with cycles, and label the objects , so that the permutation is represented by
To form a new permutation of objects and cycles one must insert the new object into this array. There are, evidently ways to perform this insertion. This explains the term of the recurrence relation. Q.E.D.
Stirling numbers of the second kind
Stirling numbers of the second kind S(n,k) (with a capital "S") count the number of equivalence relations having k equivalence classes defined on a set with n elements. The sum
is the nth Bell number. If we let
(in particular, (x)0 = 1 because it is an empty product) be the falling factorial, we can characterize the Stirling numbers of the second kind by
(Confusingly, the notation that combinatorialists use for falling factorials coincides with the notation used in special functions for rising factorials; see Pochhammer symbol.)
Table of values
Below is a table of values for the Stirling numbers of the second kind:
n \ k | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
0 | 1 | |||||||||
1 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||
2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||||||
4 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | |||||
5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 1 | ||||
6 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 90 | 65 | 15 | 1 | |||
7 | 0 | 1 | 63 | 301 | 350 | 140 | 21 | 1 | ||
8 | 0 | 1 | 127 | 966 | 1701 | 1050 | 266 | 28 | 1 | |
9 | 0 | 1 | 255 | 3025 | 7770 | 6951 | 2646 | 462 | 36 | 1 |
Recurrence relation
These obey the recurrence relationship
with
- .
Simple identities
Some simple identities include
This is because dividing n elements into n − 1 sets means each set wouldn't be larger than 2 (otherwise, there will be only n − 3 elements we have to put into at least n − 2 sets, each set contains at least one element) actually due to the same logic there can be exactly one set whose size is 2. Therefore we actually have to pick the unique two elements which would be in this set. Thus the above formula;
and
This is since dividing n elements into two sets A and B, allowing one set to be empty is 2n (each element has 2 possiblities to select a set to be in). Now we need to remove two unallowed states one where A is empty and the other where B is empty. Except since we counted each division of states where some elements are in A an all the others in B and the case where all the others were in A and those who were in A are in B also they are interepreted as a single case in our set division, we must divide 2n − 2 by 2, and thus we get the formula above.
Explicit formula
The Stirling numbers of the second kind are given by the explicit formula
- .
Relation to Poisson distribution
The Stirling numbers of the second kind enjoy the following relationship with the Poisson distribution: if X is a random variable with a Poisson distribution with expected value λ, then its nth moment is
In particular, the nth moment of the Poisson distribution with expected value 1 is precisely the number of partitions of a set of size n, i.e., it is the nth Bell number (this fact is "Dobinski's formula").
Inversion relationships
The Stirling numbers of the first and second kind can be considered to be inverses of one-another:
and
where is the Kronecker delta.
See also
- Bell polynomials
- Cycles and fixed points
- Lah number
- Pochhammer symbol
- Polynomial sequence
- Stirling transform
- Touchard polynomials
References
- D.E. Knuth, Two notes on notation (TeX source).
- Louis Comtet Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland/Boston-U.S.A., 1974.
- "Stirling numbers of the first kind". PlanetMath.
- "Stirling numbers of the second kind". PlanetMath.
- Victor Adamchick, On Stirling Numbers and Euler Sums, (1996)
- Arthur T. Benjamin, Gregory O. Preston, Jennifer J. Quinn, A Stirling Encounter with Harmonic Numbers, (2002) Mathematics Magazine, 75 (2) pp 95-103.
- J. M. Sixdeniers, K. A. Penson, A. I. Solomon, Extended Bell and Stirling Numbers From Hypergeometric Exponentiation (2001), Journal of Integer Sequences, 4, Article 01.1.4.
- Hsien-Kuei Hwang, Asymptotic Expansions for the Stirling Numbers of the First Kind (1994).