Talk:Krystal Meyers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:49, 1 May 2009

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Source of article content

I have checked the article and all the text beyond the introductory paragraph is a cut a paste job from official site's biography. If no one does anything about it in next week, I will remove the text and add a music artist template reducing this article to stub.--Kevin586 15:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources in general

I cannot find anywhere on the Internet that Krystal Meyers considers herself "the real rock chick". A citation is needed for Anticonformity and the Christian camp. I also suggest a "Comparison with Avril Lavigne" or "Comparison with other rock chicks" section. --Superkirbyartist (talk) 23:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links

why were external links deleted? there's no reason fansites should not included. ~kp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.26.124.0 (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 I also suggest a "Comparison with Avril Lavigne" or "Comparison with other rock chicks" section.
 --[[User:Superkirbyartist|Superkirbyartist]] ([[User talk:Superkirbyartist|talk]]) 23:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
-== Scandal ==
-:: why was this taken off the talk page? what supposed  WP:BLP violation? it's a referenceable article we're talking about here, not the speculation per se and the asian event with wyclef is notable as well, the upskirt picture and its deletion cause of concern ~ kp
-:::Blogs are hardly a [[WP:Reliable Source|reliable source]] and a circumstantial upskirt shot from China is hardly noteworthy.--[[User:Kencaesi|Kencaesi]] ([[User talk:Kencaesi|talk]]) 00:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
-:::: Redeleting the content that violates WP:BLP. The only speculation is whether or not the perp that fabricated the rumour will face criminal and civil, or merely civil charges.[[User:Pseudo daoist|jonathon]] ([[User talk:Pseudo daoist|talk]]) 02:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 == Links ==