Talk:List of countries by intentional homicide rate: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
GrandpaScott (talk | contribs) I'm sure of the data |
←Replaced content with 'The problem with information supplied on Nigeria is that the Nigeria Police tends to depress figures and it might be more reliable if supported with Non Governm...' |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The problem with information supplied on Nigeria is that the Nigeria Police tends to depress figures and it might be more reliable if supported with Non Governmental Organizations' Human right and Crime reports as well as local crime journals. |
|||
{{skip to talk}} |
|||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{ArticleHistory|action1=AFD |
|||
|action1date=11 October 2006 |
|||
|action1link=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder Rate |
|||
|action1result=kept |
|||
|action1oldid=80478515 |
|||
Also, MOST murders may end up being classified as cases of missing persons due to a high rate of ritual kidnaps and murders which are highly covert and syndicated in these parts. |
|||
|action2=PR |
|||
|action2date=20:10, 25 December 2006 |
|||
|action2link=Wikipedia:Peer review/List of countries by murder rate/archive1 |
|||
|action2result=reviewed |
|||
|action2oldid=96441836 |
|||
|action3=FLC |
|||
|action3date=08:35, 27 January 2007 |
|||
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of countries by murder rate |
|||
|action3result=not promoted |
|||
|action3oldid=103129081 |
|||
|currentstatus=FFLC |
|||
}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Death|class=list|importance=high}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Crime}} |
|||
the sorting is broken but I don't know how to fix it <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.141.1.81|72.141.1.81]] ([[User talk:72.141.1.81|talk]]) 05:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==SUBNATIONAL RATES== |
|||
Tables corresponding to particular administrative regions inside every country must not to be added to this article but to have an special one for each country's states/provinces. |
|||
[[User:kardrak|kardrak]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 01:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Shouldn't there be a section on stereotypes? == |
|||
Many guidebooks, even these by well known publishers create false stereotypes. People from Western Europe or the USA tend to think that countries like Poland, or even worse Indonesia or Morocco are dangerous, yet they are not when you look at these figures and most others for other crimes. This mainly hits developing countries in Europe mainly Central Europe (for instance the Warsaw chapter about crime in the LP guidebook sounds terrifing and the Madrid chapter sounds a like safe places, yet Warsaw is statistically much safer then Madrid), but it also hits the USA everywhere but in the USA, where people atribute it with guns and large levels of armed robberies and murders, here guidebooks may be more fair, but still the media hype isn't. Shouldn't these stereotypes have a section? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.205.81.66|87.205.81.66]] ([[User talk:87.205.81.66|talk]]) 22:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Sub national.== |
|||
*USA states 1995/2005 [http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=169&scid=12#MRord]. |
|||
*USA cities 2003 [http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004902.html]. -- [[User:Jeandré|Jeandré]], 2006-12-06[[User talk:Jeandré|t]]21:18z |
|||
*Colomboa cities [co-ccr2005] p. 118. -- [[User:Jeandré|Jeandré]], 2006-12-23[[User talk:Jeandré|t]]20:47z |
|||
*South Africa, per police station and province [http://www.saps.gov.za/statistics/reports/crimestats/2006/province.htm 2006], [http://www.saps.gov.za/statistics/reports/crimestats/2007/province.htm 2007]. -- [[User:Jeandré du Toit|Jeandré]], 2007-07-21[[User talk:Jeandré du Toit|t]]10:37z |
|||
There must be links to special articles about subnational rates. |
|||
[[User:kardrak|kardrak]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 17:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Moving article== |
|||
Heya gang. I propose that we rename this article to "List of countries by homicide rate", and replace all instances of "murder" with "homicide" in the article. This is because "[[murder]]" is a very specific kind of homicide, and by definition would exclude [[manslaughter]] or unsolved killings. I'll do this in a couple hours unless somebody has objections. As I understand it, this article is meant to cover "killings", right? Please let me know if I am mistaken. -[[User:Taco325i|Taco325i]] 01:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I don't know if this is correct. Possibly the reported rates are sometimes for all homicides and sometimes for just murder. For example, the latest figures for South Africa from the South African police (http://www.saps.gov.za/statistics/reports/crimestats/2006/categories.htm) give a murder rate of 39.5 per 100 000 for April 2005 to April 2006. Total murders pluse culpable homicides (the two catagories of homicide in SA law) are 66 per 100 000 for the same period. Since the murder rate has been declining in SA for the last few years, I assume that it is this rate that is reported in the figures, not the total homicide rate. Whether the article is headed murder or homicide, the figures probably need to be cleaned up. [[User:Brutus42|Brutus42]] 13:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:In my opinion it was definitely a mistake to move from [[murder]] to [[homicide]] as the definitions are different, and internationally less comparable. While all murders are homicides, not all homicides are murders. Also different countries include different criminal offences in their homicide data, including both conspiracy and abortion offences in some data sets and may often exclude traffic deaths. Murder is probably the most closely comparable statistic because most jurisdictions will count each person killed, whatever counting method they use. I would suggest having a page for each with notes about how each country's statistics are recorded. -- [[User:Cameron Dewe|Cameron Dewe]] 11:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::And in Islamic countries, the intentional killing of a non-Muslim by a Muslim is not murder, only the killing of an innocent Muslim is defined as murder. The intentional killing of a Muslim (by another Muslim) for honor or blasphemy is also not murder. This will significantly distort the stats from Islamic countries. [[User:Santamoly|Santamoly]] ([[User talk:Santamoly|talk]]) 20:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==Andorra== |
|||
Not a single homicide? Not one? And sources that carry no obvious relation? Not only does this sound too good to be true but I call bullshit.<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->{{undated}} |
|||
Because I fear it might actually be relevant to some other statistic involved here I won't be editting straight out, but those numbers can't be right. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.213.168.136|80.213.168.136]] ([[User talk:80.213.168.136|talk]]) 21:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Not a math guy, but it looks wrong to me, too. --[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチュ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 22:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==And Iraq?== |
|||
Iraq is not included in many of the lists. |
|||
I think the ongoing violence and the different reports by different organizations might make it hard to find a reliable source. |
|||
But still it should be included in the list. |
|||
This link might be useful: |
|||
http://newsbusters.org/node/9932 |
|||
[[User:Rmleon|Rmleon]] 02:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I'm not being funny Rmleon but that NewsBusters article is TERRIBLE. I don't know the site, but unfortunately they gave the game away straight off with the subtitle at the top of the screen. There were more hostile civilian deaths in just Baghdad during 2006 than there were murders in the United States the same year. The guy's using obviously incomplete figures for Iraq (they've got better since but are still WAY incomplete) to suit his own thesis. |
|||
I think Iraq could be included on this list. The IBC has it's murder/hostile death rate (just for civilians) at 101 per 100,000 for 2006 and 89 per capita last year. What do people think? [[User:Sarcastic Sid|Sarcastic Sid]] ([[User talk:Sarcastic Sid|talk]]) 01:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Are we sure these figures are correctly separating intentional homicide rates in Iraq from civilian war-related deaths? [[Special:Contributions/24.16.88.14|24.16.88.14]] ([[User talk:24.16.88.14|talk]]) 17:42, 26 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I added 2008 data, which works out to 21. [[Special:Contributions/67.173.73.156|67.173.73.156]] ([[User talk:67.173.73.156|talk]]) 21:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==German figures are not correct== |
|||
According to the chief of the Bavarian Police, the German homicide rate is twice as high as published by the German Federal Government. This is made possible by only accounting for those victims who die and are recovered in the same year. Also, ther German police only performs half as many autopsys as it should. So the real rate is above 2 victims per 100'000 citizens. |
|||
[[User:Meswiss|Meswiss]] 08:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
: That only accumulates to heresay, this is just republication of the government statistics. In addition to that there is no differentiation between the GDR and the BRD during the years of seperation.[[User:Spacedwarv|Spacedwarv]] 00:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Luxembourg figures are not correct== |
|||
Luxembourg has a long history of leaving out those years where the number of victims would make them look bad. |
|||
[[User:Meswiss|Meswiss]] 08:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==French figures are not correct== |
|||
France numbers depend on politics and can not be considered ad valid. Many victims are never being accounted for using methods like Germany. |
|||
[[User:Meswiss|Meswiss]] 08:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Homicide or Murder rates?== |
|||
Are these statistics for [[homicide]] or [[murder]]? This page started of being called [[List of countries by murder rate]] then was moved to [[List of countries by homicide rate]]. However, in many juridictions these are two distinctly different sets of statistics, some of which indicate that only about a half of homicides are murders. This will account for the differences being reported above. There is a risk that poor definition of which sort of statistics these are will make this information useless as it will be untrustworthy. -- [[User:Cameron Dewe|Cameron Dewe]] 11:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Does the blue map show the homicide rate or the murder rate? This article says homicide, but [[murder]] says its the murder rate. [[User:Emperor001|Emperor001]] 14:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==European Union== |
|||
Don´t think that the number for the EU is that high. All of the "big" memberstate´s rates are bellow 2.37. So the EU number can not be correct. Perhaps this helps: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/hosb1203.pdf 30.05.2007- 16:34 |
|||
:That Home Office document appears to be better researched than some of the other source documents used in the article. It gives a definition of what is meant by "Homicide" as well as giving caveats around the data. The rates given in the above home office document differ markedly from those in the article. To me it suggests two different sets of data have been used. The original statistics in the article were ''Murder'' rates. The Home Office data gives ''Homicide'' rates. These are different aggregations of crime, meaning the data in the article is now suspect, and probably inaccurate. -- [[User:Cameron Dewe|Cameron Dewe]] 12:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Factor== |
|||
Shouldn't another factor for the murder rate listed be the area of the country in addition to how many people there are. Aren't murders more likely to be committed when a large population is squeezed into a smaller aera? [[User:Emperor001|Emperor001]] 01:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Murder is such a rare event. For example Norfolk Island has had ONE murder in one hundred years! A large population, a large area, and a long period of time is needed to determine the murder rate. And it is only an average, with a statistical variation. From a statistical point of view, having a sample size of less than about 30 or so (murders) is pushing the envelope of statistical validity in any case. Murder rate statistics for some cities are published, mostly the capital cities of the countries concerned. However, I think crime rates per population (density) per land area unit is going to be a challenging one to find. Quite simply there is not the research out there on how population density affects crime beyond the observation the bigger the population the more crime. Crime researchers seem to agree that because crime is committed by and upon people, it is the population that affects the numbers of crimes, so compute rates per unit of population, not rates per land area. If population density was a major factor then it would be expressed that way in the first place. I suppose you could correlate population density with the crime rate, but I have not seen any research on the topic. Wikipedia is not about doing original research, but about reporting the findings of researchers. There are other factors that affect the Murder/Homicide/Crime rate that are probably more important - like counting the same crime the same way under different legislation. That is currently the problem with this page - Homicide is not always Murder and every country defines both based on their own legislation and counts the crime according to their own rules, not some standard set of rules somewhere. That is probably a lot bigger factor than close quarters living. It is not even the same in one country - for example Scotland counts the cases that have one or more offences of murder while England and Wales count each victim of murder. Thus the Dunblaine killings were one murder in Scotland, although 17 people were killed; The Lockerbie bombing was also a single murder, with 170 odd victims; While the terrorism of September 11th, 2001 was not even counted as a Homicide but as Terrorism! About the only other factor researchers appear concerned about is whether or not someone was killed (or murdered) by a firearm. -- [[User:Cameron Dewe|Cameron Dewe]] 11:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==From a new Wikipedian: How the hell do you 'cite' sources??== |
|||
I've been studying the tutorials for hours and I'm baffled. Basically I'm trying to get my source in the 'references' section so it can be verified, but have no idea how. [[User:Sarcastic Sid|Sarcastic Sid]] 04:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
EDIT: Don't worry I've got the hang of it. [[User:Sarcastic Sid|Sarcastic Sid]] 09:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Questionable UN report?== |
|||
I removed the UN crime report on Colombia as I felt it contained erroneous info. It kept talking about most of Colombia's gun homicides being highly orchestrated and professional. It's my understanding the big percentage of both homicides and gun homicides to be poor slum dwellers feuding over the local drug trade, arguments in the street/bar fights, crimes of passion, street robberies etc. |
|||
Where I did agree was the ownership of legal arms doesn't seem to equate to a higher homicide rate. Apart from that it wasn't the Colombia I know. They may have lumped the youth gang violence in with organized crime too which would be a little disingenuous. |
|||
Colombia isn't a nation of psychos but to claim most of the gun killings are not unorganized, impulsive and/or indiscriminate is just wrong. What do people think? [[User:Sarcastic Sid|Sarcastic Sid]] 14:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I think that this isn't the place to evaluate or discuss every other detail of the UN report or in general to debate the different perceptions about how gun homicides / violence operate in Colombia. It's still a perfectly valid source as far as homicide figures are concerned, as a lot of the figures in the article are also from UN docs. This article is just a list of homicide rates, after all. It's not dealing with the other details you've mentioned. [[User:Juancarlos2004|Juancarlos2004]] 21:06, 23 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Venezuela numbers== |
|||
Most of the really violent countries I'm fairly certain include legal/police killings in their homicides - so I've done the same for Venezuela as they were seperate for that nation. |
|||
I don't know if anyone has seperated figures for ''all'' the worst countries but we are talking homicides (obviously not in the culpable or negligent sense) rather than murder rate. South Africa I believe also includes legal homicides in their official statistics, even though it's classed as the 'murder rate' rather than 'homicides' like Latin American countries. I'm pretty sure I read that on a reputable website a while back but if anyone knows for sure let us know. |
|||
Thanks. [[User:Sarcastic Sid|Sarcastic Sid]] 04:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
A lot of unclear assumptions here. The direct source cited in the article: http://www.chacao.gov.ve/plan180/anodespues.pdf, lists total homicides as 12,257 for 2006. This works out to a rate of 45, not 65. The above starts doing its own calculations and leaves things entirely unclear as to the veracity of the figures or rates put on the page. Where does it give a figure for "legal/police killings" and where does it say these are not included in the 12,257 figure? Until there are clear answers to these questions, the correct number and rate is 12,257 and 45 as given in the cited source. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.73.107.18|74.73.107.18]] ([[User talk:74.73.107.18|talk]]) 08:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I haven't done my own calculations at all. The Colombian murder stats for '04 and '05 at least include legal intervention - the Venezuelan figures will stay as they are unless someone who's worked extensively on this list tells me otherwise. 65 per 100,000 unfortunately (for Venezuela) is the true level of interpersonal violence in that country. We often don't know what countries include legal and illegal homicides together or seperately so adding all 'intentional' deaths as one is perfectly valid. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 20:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I've just read your comment again and, with respect, you have poor understanding of Spanish or you haven't read the source properly. I put the page number on the footnote and it clearly states there were over 17,000 intentional homicides in Venezuela in 2006 (65 per 100,000). [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 20:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Okay, here's the breakdown of what the Spanish descriptions mean in the source provided: |
|||
Homicidios (murders), resistencia (self defence killings) and averiguación (either murder or self defence but unconfirmed). [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 11:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I believe that averiguacion refers to deaths under some kind of investigation. Can you show where it says these are "either murder or self defense (killings)"? |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/74.73.107.18|74.73.107.18]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.73.107.18|74.73.107.18]] ([[User talk:74.73.107.18|talk]]) 16:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I'm looking at these sources more closely and I really think this is questionable. I can understand the inclusion of the "legal" killings, but it's this third category that isn't credible. I don't believe this source has any idea at all what might have been the cause of the deaths in the 'averiguacion' category. They are just deaths that triggered some kind of investigation. This particular source seems to just choose to assume they're all homicides of some sort, but this just seems like a fanciful assumption on the part of this particular source. The most recent edit on this page noted that the title of this page was changed to make clear that it did not include traffic accidents, which are sometimes classed as 'culpable homicides'. How do we know deaths from traffic accidents are not among those being investigated in these numbers (averiguacion)? It would make sense that such deaths would be in those numbers (that's how you determine which ones are or aren't culpable homicides). Or what about suicides or any other types of somehow suspicious or sudden deaths that might trigger investigations? There might be some (unknown) number of homicides within those numbers, but that doesn't make these homicide numbers. What struck me when i saw this list is how much Venezuela stuck out from the others. But this seems to be due solely to the dubious inclusion of these numbers that aren't homicide numbers, where otherwise it would be in the top 10 and more similar to the others in the top 10. Are the other countries including figures of "homicides" where you don't know if they were homicides or not, but just that they were investigated for some reason or other? I think the Venezuela numbers need to be changed. The current ones aren't credible.[[Special:Contributions/74.73.107.18|74.73.107.18]] ([[User talk:74.73.107.18|talk]]) 11:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I've apologized to the above on their talk page, I'm embarrassed it was out order. I'll change the figures to proven murders and self defence killings when I have the time unless someone beats me to it. Figures from the last few years tabulate legal homicides seperately from murders so I'll do a table here explaining the calculations with both combined or something (excluding averiguación unless someone can prove their inclusion). I expect that'll be okay. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 18:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks. 2007 numbers are given in this report: |
|||
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/11/18/ST2008111801141.html |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/74.73.107.18|74.73.107.18]] ([[User talk:74.73.107.18|talk]]) 05:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Did a source check on the Venezuala numbers as they stood out to me. Source 20 lists the homicides for Venezuala as a whole as 10,606 which when calculated against the population of 26 million means a rate of 40.7 not 48. Not going to weigh into the other debate going on here regarding the way this source counts its homicides ... but I imagine a source stating the rate is 40.7 would be considered the maximum while other sources would be considered "including manslaughter" etc.--[[User:Senor Freebie|Senor Freebie]] ([[User talk:Senor Freebie|talk]]) 15:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Sorry, just did a double take. The figures I looked at were the murder rate for 08 and the population currently listed on Wikipedia for Venezuala. Given these figures exist though, perhaps its worth adding the 08 figure if someone can find the 08 population?--[[User:Senor Freebie|Senor Freebie]] ([[User talk:Senor Freebie|talk]]) 16:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks. I've done it for you but I still don't think thats the real rate. If you go through all the sources for Venezuela you will find different numbers of homicides. According to the last UN report there were 34 deaths per 100,000 pop in 2004 and here it says there were 45. The federal police on a press conference in January said there were 8,400 homicides in 2008 and that would bring the rate down to 32, sadly that wasn't posted on the Internet. Whatsoever, I decided to wait for another UN report to change or keep this numbers. For now let's believe in those numbers. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/201.248.69.228|201.248.69.228]] ([[User talk:201.248.69.228|talk]]) 02:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I reinstated the elevated figures up to 2003 - remember they've added killings by police in self-defence on top of pure murders in the first Venezuelan document from 1990 to that year apart from 1997. I agree that someone changed my adding of legal killings with murders 2004 onwards as it doesn't combine the two in the sources apart from having undetermined deaths totalled with them. I thought I read somewhere on Wiki the 'data has to fit the source'. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 01:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Swedish figures are not correct== |
|||
In sweden there is a big difference between reported killings and actual killings. according to BRÅ (the swedish branch of government that studie crime) the reported number is nowadays almost twice as large as the Actual number of homicides. This is due to some crimes being filed twice, murders abroad being filed in sweden, etc. If there is suspicion of a murder a murder is 'reported', and it stays reported even if it turns out to be suicide or just a mentally ill person who believes people are being murdered all over the place. The report (unfortunately enough in swedish) is here http://www.bra.se/extra/measurepoint/?module_instance=4&name=03061810981.pdf&url=/dynamaster/file_archive/050119/36f538e30fef8246c5215eb566559ca0/03061810981.pdf Since they do not give the numbers for all years I am reluctant to fill in the correct numbers since they only go up to 2002, which will give a hell of a jump in murder rates in 2003 =/ |
|||
User thinking about getting registerd... |
|||
: You are right. The pdf says that out of 223 reported murders 2003, only 98 were homicide. (page 9) |
|||
: I'll quote straight from the pdf with a few comments by me. |
|||
:: '''Korrekt registrerade brott (enligt anvisningar)''' [''correctly registered''] 124 |
|||
:: Dödligt våld i Sverige 91 |
|||
:: Dödligt våld utomlands [''committed abroad''] 24* |
|||
:: Stämpling till mord (ej fullbordat) [''not completed''] 9 |
|||
:: '''Felaktigt registrerade brott''' [''incorrectly registered crimes''] 89 |
|||
:: Försök eller förberedelse [''attempt or preperation''] 11 |
|||
:: Alkohol/narkotikarelaterad förgiftning, självmord, olycka eller naturlig död [''poisoning, suicide, accident''] 28 |
|||
:: Dubblettanmälan 25 |
|||
:: Övrigt eller okänd ej brottslig orsak [''other /unknonwn non-criminal cause''] 25 |
|||
:: Oklart om brott föreligger 10 |
|||
:: Brott ej styrkt 2 |
|||
:: '''Samtliga''' [''Total''] 223 |
|||
::'''Dödligt våld som anmälts i Sverige år 2002 (se ovan)''' [''Correctly reported homicides for 2002''] 91 |
|||
::'''Dödligt våld som rubricerats som vållande till annans död''' [''Homicides reported as manslaughter''] 7 |
|||
::'''Summa anmält dödligt våld i Sverige år 2002''' [''Actual total homicides for 2002''] 98 |
|||
:: *[''Examples of crimes committed abroad were 15 murders in former Yugoslavia.'' - page 8-9] |
|||
: But since the English-language sources mention the higher number I think it is hard to change. |
|||
: [[User:Fred J|Fred]]-[[User_talk:Fred J|J]] 15:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: I found a text of it in English: http://www.bra.se/extra/pod/?action=pod_show&id=39&module_instance=11 . Quote: ''[S]pecial studies show that over the past 30 years in Sweden, there have been on average around 100 cases annually of lethal violence in the form of murder, manslaughter and assault with lethal results. There has consequently been no increased in lethal violence since 1975'' |
|||
: Around 100 homicides would mean around 1 homicide per 100,000 instead of the higher figure given in the article of 2 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants. |
|||
: But having "special studies" makes it hard to compare statistics. |
|||
: [[User:Fred J|Fred]]-[[User_talk:Fred J|J]] 16:00, 18 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Pakistan ??? == |
|||
0,05 for the Pakistan ? Is a joke ? [[fr:Utilisateur:L'amateur d'aéroplanes]] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.0.204.114|90.0.204.114]] ([[User talk:90.0.204.114|talk]]) 10:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I don't think so. An unstable country (in a general sense) does not always have a high homicide rate. Pakistan has a large population, so even with sensational homicide cases (such as terrorist acts in the case of Pakistan), the overall homicide rate could be quite low. A smaller country can see its homicide rate skyrocket with just one person murdered while it takes hundreds of homicides for a large country to see any effect. Note that Pakistan's population is about 40 times that of Singapore's. Combining those information with this rate, it means that Pakistan has 4x case of homicides compared to Singapore, but because of larger population, Pakistan ends up with significantly smaller homicide rate. This obviously doesn't mean it's safer to live in Pakistan because other crimes are not taken into account. It just means that you are unlikely to be murdered in Pakistan. --[[User:Revth|Revth]] ([[User talk:Revth|talk]]) 04:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
From [http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/rwinslow/asia_pacific/pakistan.html], according to INTERPOL data, the rate of murder in Pakistan was 6.86 (per 100,000 population) in 2000. Not sure why the large discrepancy with the UN data. --[[User:Vsion|Vsion]] ([[User talk:Vsion|talk]]) 06:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:There are now two Pakistan entries in the table <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.176.147.226|67.176.147.226]] ([[User talk:67.176.147.226|talk]]) 19:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I remember when Bhutto got killed. I said to myself: "6 months of homicide cases within one hour! ". Then you know Pakistan does not have a homicide rate of 0.02. |
|||
:I too said the same thing. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/83.108.31.145|83.108.31.145]] ([[User talk:83.108.31.145|talk]]) 23:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Deleted original and sourced Jamaican statistic from 1970's list == |
|||
....a complete accident as I didn't know it was on there before I'd put in all the hard work, but I think my source is a lot more solid and it's every single year from 1970 onwards. It's also not the same stat stretched over two years like the other one, and it's still 10 per 100,000 like the original with 13 for the other year. |
|||
To the guy or guys who put in Jamaican entries for the late 90's and 00's, I apologize if you had sources but at the time it was unsourced. Jamaica's murder rate in 2005 is also (as far as I know) universally recognized as being around 60 per 100,000 rather than the 45 per 100,000 that was on there. Regardless, I do apologize if you're work wasn't finished. -- [[User:Sarcastic Sid|Sarcastic Sid]] ([[User talk:Sarcastic Sid|talk]]) 19:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:More data is good, but Jamaica's 1980s, 1990s (1998 contradicts it's only ref: [14]), and 2001-2005 is now the only information not referenced in the article. Except for Jamaica everything else is either referenced to a cite next to the country name, or below the decade section: [13], [14], [25], [26]. Please add refs as soon as possible per [[WP:V]]. -- [[User:Jeandré du Toit|Jeandré]], 2007-12-29[[User talk:Jeandré du Toit|t]]16:30z |
|||
::I missed that reference. I don't know if people want to keep my data or use those three years in the UN report, with perhaps the stats I provided either side of them. The link I provided for Jamaica is on the 70's list, it goes right up to 2006 and it's meant to cover the 80's, 90's and 00's as well. |
|||
::I don't know how you get the same reference number on the same page though, as when I try it comes up with a different No. for the same link. Would someone help us out with that? -- [[User:Sarcastic Sid|Sarcastic Sid]] ([[User talk:Sarcastic Sid|talk]]) 00:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::To reuse a ref you give it a unique name e.g. "foo2007": <nowiki><ref name="foo2007">Foo, Bar. "Baz" 2007-12-30.</ref></nowiki> and then you cite it again with with 1 tag that has a / at the end like <nowiki><ref name="foo2007" /></nowiki>. I've done this for Jamaica. While I've sometimes used two diferent figures for 1 country with different refs, I've kept this to only the UN Caribbean ref instead of including the different UN year ref as well. -- [[User:Jeandré du Toit|Jeandré]], 2007-12-30[[User talk:Jeandré du Toit|t]]19:02z |
|||
Thanks for that. I've filled in a few countries' rates for 2006 too. I keep missing those references next to the years but I'll look out for them in future. Thanks again. |
|||
[[User:Sarcastic Sid|Sarcastic Sid]] ([[User talk:Sarcastic Sid|talk]]) 22:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Albania figures are not correct== |
|||
Someone has put Albania down as '96.46' in 1995, '87.55' in 1996, and '296.39' in 1997. These are all incorrect. The link provided clearly show that the 'successfully completed homicides per 100,000' was '6.46', '7.55', and '46.39' respectively. You can see someone has been screwing around with the statistics by adding numbers to the front of the old statistics. --[[User:Delos|Delos]] ([[User talk:Delos|talk]]) 03:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Sorting seems broken== |
|||
When sorting a column with the largest values at top, sorting happens alphabetically, thus leaving both "5" and "55" below "6". How should this be solved? Padding with zeroes? [[User:Joachim Michaelis|JoaCHIP]] ([[User talk:Joachim Michaelis|talk]]) 10:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*This is a problem stemming from the change in Wikimedia script. Right now, the best way to deal would probably be padding. <b>[[User:Collegebookworm|<span style="font-family:courier;color:green;background:#FFD700">CB..</span>]][[User talk:Collegebookworm|<span style="font-family:courier;color:green;background:#FFD700">.(ö)</span>]]</b> 01:39, 28 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Cyprus == |
|||
According to the official government police sources which can be found here http://www.police.gov.cy/police/police.nsf/All/72F71BC1A947C666C225741A0041EAFB/$file/Serious%20crime.pdf in 2007 there were 11 cases out of a population of around 790 000 by 2007 (official pop 2006 778 700 X 1.6% official pop increase = 791 000). That means that in 2007 the murder rate 11/790 000 must be 1.39. Will someone add it? I don't know how to reference properly. [[User:Whitemagick]] ([[User talk:Whitemagick|talk]]) 22:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Iraq added == |
|||
I've put Iraq in. Apparently these are only civilian deaths directly related to the invasion and don't include security personnel or traditional crime-related deaths, so they're not 100% percent accurate which isn't surprising given the chaotic conditions that pervade in Iraq. |
|||
There may be an issue with some people over this addition. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 17:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I don't think that Iraq should be included, unless the figure is from a governmental or UN source. Iraq Body Count is neither of these.--[[Special:Contributions/93.97.196.179|93.97.196.179]] ([[User talk:93.97.196.179|talk]]) 14:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
You can delete it if you want I only put it in to see how people would react. I think it's valid, though some of the deaths inevitably would be crossfire so they're not really intentional but still a result of original hostile intent. I dunno...I won't mind too much if it's excluded. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 17:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I updated Iraq with the 2008 numbers, which as one would expect are far lower. Violent deaths are from icasualties.org (5929), population from CIA Factbook (28.2M). This number is probably overstated (the official number from the gov't of Iraq is lower -- 5714) as the icasaulties.org numbers come from IBC, which relies on newspaper reports (Iraq's free press is only a few years old and tends to print wild rumors that turn out to be exaggerated) and includes all violent deaths, but should serve as a reasonable compromise. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/67.173.73.156|67.173.73.156]] ([[User talk:67.173.73.156|talk]]) 14:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Japan listed twice == |
|||
Japan is listed twice with different numbers. We need to choose the most recent reliable source and base a single listing on that. [[User:Heroeswithmetaphors|Heroeswithmetaphors]] ([[User talk:Heroeswithmetaphors|talk]]) 00:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== List of countries by ''intentional'' homicide rate == |
|||
This is a far more appropriate title as the description clearly refers to interpersonal confrontation. |
|||
Homicides can also include traffic and industrial accidents, hence the change. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 11:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Alphabetical order? == |
|||
Wouldn't putting this list in A-Z be better? It would make the article look more substantial. I also suggest removing the color coding and aligning the numbers centrally to neaten things up. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 12:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I think A-Z is not so useful because anyone can search for a country with Ctrl + F and instead a top-down ranking is better. [[User:Heroeswithmetaphors|Heroeswithmetaphors]] ([[User talk:Heroeswithmetaphors|talk]]) 02:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Copy/paste copyright violation.== |
|||
See [[Talk:List of countries by intentional homicide rate to 1999]]. -- [[User:Jeandré du Toit|Jeandré]], 2008-09-29[[User talk:Jeandré du Toit|t]]20:07z |
|||
==Historic Data== |
|||
What has happened to all the data that used to exist on this page regarding historic homicide rates, from previous decades? Has it simply been erased? I can see why the new design is more user friendly for someone looking up a country's present situation, but the previous data should be available somewhere. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.97.196.179|93.97.196.179]] ([[User talk:93.97.196.179|talk]]) 14:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:See the link at the top of the article, and in the "see also" section: |
|||
:[[List of countries by intentional homicide rate to 1999]] --[[User:Timeshifter|Timeshifter]] ([[User talk:Timeshifter|talk]]) 03:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Pakistan listed twice== |
|||
Unsure which one is right, but I have trouble believing Pakistan has one of the lowest murder rates in the world. (Burma is the lowest ???) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/12.160.32.116|12.160.32.116]] ([[User talk:12.160.32.116|talk]]) 22:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Venezuela change and explanation == |
|||
I've subtracted the deaths under investigation. The 2003/04 human rights report on Venezuela's security already includes murders and justifiable homicides combined (excluding 'averiguación' deaths) from 1990 to 2003. |
|||
2004 to 2006: |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" cellspacing="0" |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|Year |
|||
! style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|Murder Rate |
|||
! style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|Justifiable Homicide Rate |
|||
! style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|Total |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|2004 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|37 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|8.2 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|45.2 |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|2005 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|37 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|5.1 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|42.1 |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|2006 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|45 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|4.4 |
|||
|style="width:25%;text-align:center;"|49.4 |
|||
|} |
|||
--[[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 18:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==New Discussion== |
|||
A discussion has been started at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries]] which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries. Editors are invited to participate. ''[[User:Pfainuk|Pfainuk]]'' <small>''[[User Talk:Pfainuk|talk]]''</small> 11:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Spain's figures must be mistaken== |
|||
The rate for 2000 shown here is 1.25 per 100 000, but then it jumps to an annual rate of 3.35 in 2006. This looks suspect. The 2006 figure is taken from Spain's Ministry of Interior website. But the [[Eurostat]] website shows that Spain's average annual homicide rate between 2004 and 2006 was 1.14 per 100 000. The interior ministry website is wrong. Please correct the map. |
|||
== Panama homidide rate == |
|||
In todays newspaper 'La Prensa' , they indicate that Panama, with a population of around 3500000 people has 135 homicides a DAY. |
|||
QTE 135 víctimas dejó la delincuencia cada día UQTE for full article see: |
|||
http://prensa.com/t.asp?d=090406p1746615 |
|||
^^^^ <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/201.227.26.149|201.227.26.149]] ([[User talk:201.227.26.149|talk]]) 13:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
"135 homicides a DAY" |
|||
Clearly not correct. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 10:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:It says crimes and not homicides. delincuencia->crime homicidio/asesinato-> homicide. [[User:Nando.sm|Nando.sm]] ([[User talk:Nando.sm|talk]]) |
|||
== Northern Ireland flag == |
|||
Please see this diff: |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate&diff=287810617&oldid=287810029] |
|||
I made a mistake by using this wikicode: |
|||
:<nowiki>{{flagcountry|Ireland}}, Northern</nowiki> |
|||
It produces this: |
|||
:{{flagcountry|Ireland}}, Northern |
|||
Sorry. I was trying to correct the sorting problem. It solved the sorting problem, but I wasn't thinking clearly about Irish flags! |
|||
I think I should have used this wikicode: |
|||
:<nowiki>{{flagcountry|Northern Ireland}}</nowiki> |
|||
It produces this: |
|||
:{{flagcountry|Northern Ireland}} |
|||
I hope that is correct. If it is not correct, then we need some kind of placeholder image there in order to allow the table to be sorted alphabetically. |
|||
See |
|||
*[[Template:Flagcountry]] |
|||
[[Template:Country data Northern Ireland]] looks like the place to solve the problem. |
|||
See also: [[Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland]] |
|||
--[[User:Timeshifter|'''Timeshifter''']] ([[User talk:Timeshifter|talk]]) 00:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Northern Ireland does not have a flag, it has not had one since 1973. [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 01:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::OK. If '''<nowiki>{{flagcountry|Northern Ireland}}</nowiki>''' is not used in the table, then when the arrow at the top of the country column is clicked then "Northern Ireland" is not sorted alphabetically. Instead, it goes to the top of the table. To see what I mean try clicking the arrow in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate&oldid=289402899 this version of the article]. --[[User:Timeshifter|'''Timeshifter''']] ([[User talk:Timeshifter|talk]]) 01:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
(unindent) Here is a new blank {{tl|flagcountry}} variant just created: |
|||
:<nowiki>{{flagcountry|Northern Ireland|blank}}</nowiki> |
|||
It produces this: |
|||
:{{flagcountry|Northern Ireland|blank}} |
|||
It allows alphabetical sorting of the list. |
|||
Please see [[Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland#List of countries by intentional homicide rate]] for more info. |
|||
I put it in the list. It shows no flag. Is this acceptable? |
|||
--[[User:Timeshifter|'''Timeshifter''']] ([[User talk:Timeshifter|talk]]) 23:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:Andrwsc]] knew of a better solution, and added it to the article. |
|||
:See {{tl|noflag}}. |
|||
:<nowiki>{{noflag|[[Northern Ireland]]}}</nowiki> |
|||
:produces |
|||
:{{noflag|[[Northern Ireland]]}} |
|||
:This method allows alphabetical sorting to work correctly. It is better than a blank spot with a border that looks like it is missing a flag. That variant has been deleted. |
|||
:So ''<nowiki>{{flagcountry|Northern Ireland|blank}}</nowiki>'' no longer works. --[[User:Timeshifter|'''Timeshifter''']] ([[User talk:Timeshifter|talk]]) 22:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I agree with Andrwsc's solution. Good proposal.--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] ([[User talk:Vintagekits|talk]]) 09:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== England/NI/Scotland/Wales == |
|||
Why are those here? They are not in any other lists. They are not at [[List of countries]]. The United Kingdom is the internationally accepted country and is already in the list. Having all five is very misleading and POV. At the very minimum I suggest that the four constituent parts of the UK be moved underneath the UK heading as a sub section such as the special territories part of the table on the[[Member State of the European Union]] page. If that can't be done I suggest their removal in order for the article to be NPOV. Otherwise there'll be no reason not to include US States and German Bundesländer.[[User talk:MusicInTheHouse|<font face="Mistral" size="5">'''<font color="000000">M</font><font color="770000">I</font><font color="BB0000">T</font><font color="FF6600">H</font></font>]] 23:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Please see [[List of countries by incarceration rate]]. That list was copied from the reference article, and changed to the wiki format. It also contains England/Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. |
|||
:Also please see: [[:File:Homicide-world.png]]. |
|||
:[[File:Homicide-world.png|550px]] |
|||
:It might be a good idea to start an article listing the US incarceration rates by state. The above map could be cropped to pull out only the USA map. It lists the source for the states. --[[User:Timeshifter|'''Timeshifter''']] ([[User talk:Timeshifter|talk]]) 00:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Could you respond to at least one of my comments? The source for that completely makes my point. It doesn't include the four in the main list. It's |
|||
:United Kingdom: England & Wales |
|||
:United Kingdom: Northern Ireland |
|||
:United Kingdom: Scotland |
|||
::The article needs to reflect real world NPOV.[[User talk:MusicInTheHouse|<font face="Mistral" size="5">'''<font color="000000">M</font><font color="770000">I</font><font color="BB0000">T</font><font color="FF6600">H</font></font>]] 07:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::: On the vast majority of international lists the United Kingdom should be the ONLY country listed along side other sovereign states. However when it comes to crime we do have a very different system between England+Wales and Scotland. International organisations sometimes do record them separately as the source for this list does. I dont think England/Wales / Northern Ireland need to be removed however (UK) should be added after each of them or at the very least a note explaining above or below the table that they are listed separately because of the different systems. [[User:BritishWatcher|BritishWatcher]] ([[User talk:BritishWatcher|talk]]) 08:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::Sounds good. I added "([[UK]])" after each region. --[[User:Timeshifter|'''Timeshifter''']] ([[User talk:Timeshifter|talk]]) 22:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
If one should complicate even more, why is EU (not a Federal State)listed as a State? Besides, England is singlehandedly ''nine'' statistical regions, not one. [[Australia]] does also consist of (''large'') states. The US does also consist of regions, like when they show [[basketball]] on TV. Maybe it's a good idea not to question how soon, or how late we are to stop disecting for more statistics. |
|||
Back to the UK question. I too would agree that it makes no sense to divide the UK into regions. No other country in the list is so divided. And if you compare the size of the populations of the British regions to, say the populations of the US states, it becomes even more non-sensical. As for "Scotland has a very different legal system..." Well, it used to, before the EU took over. But even if the EU hadn't superceded Scottish law, a murder is a murder is a murder. |
|||
Unless anyone can come up with good reason to the contrary, I'd say we should end the anomaly and combine the regional figures into a national figure. Like for every other country in the world....[[Special:Contributions/92.235.157.3|92.235.157.3]] ([[User talk:92.235.157.3|talk]]) 19:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are countries. So is the UK. It's an unusual circumstance, but it doesn't mean it's invalid just because you don't seem to like it. Can you name another metastate in the world that is a group of countries held tightly within a supra-state? When the old USSR was around, it would have been fine to include it and it's member countries. Similarly, just because you say the EU supercedes Scottish law doesn't mean that their parliament has suddenly dissolved - and if your argument is that the EU supercedes everyone's law and that's enough, then there should just be one entry for the vast bulk of Europe. It sounds to me that you want the change more for personal reasons than informational ones. [[Special:Contributions/59.167.194.48|59.167.194.48]] ([[User talk:59.167.194.48|talk]]) 15:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Admittedly, this has been a ''very'' slow moving edit war, and perhaps I haven't explained it clearly enough. I added the subdivisions because they're the only ones I could find (see [[#The map]]). I am a big fan of "the more information you can communicate with one image, the better." I'm going to readd the map; if anybody can find appropriate figures for other countries, I will gladly add their subdivisions. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 15:14, 18 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== EU members and candidate countries == |
|||
Eurostat has recently published the latest criminal statistics for the EU member states and candidate countries here [[http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-09-036/EN/KS-SF-09-036-EN.PDF]]. Perhaps the numbers can be updates according to that publication.--[[User:Avidius|Avidius]] ([[User talk:Avidius|talk]]) 16:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Numbers for the Netherlands == |
|||
I have updated the numbers for the Netherlands using the statistics from the Dutch CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics, http://www.cbs.nl). The numbers: |
|||
{|border="1" |
|||
|- |
|||
!YEAR |
|||
!MURDERS |
|||
!POPULATION |
|||
!PER 100.000 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2000||180||15863950||1.13 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2001||202||15987075||1.26 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2002||195||16105285||1.21 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2003||202||16192572||1.25 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2004||191||16258032||1.17 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2005||174||16305526||1.07 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2006||128||16334210||0.78 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2007||143||16357992||0.87 |
|||
|- |
|||
|2008||150||16405399||0.91 |
|||
|} |
|||
Best regards, |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/24.132.243.197|24.132.243.197]] ([[User talk:24.132.243.197|talk]]) 14:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== The map == |
|||
I have replaced the map. The arbitrary division of separate Canadian provinces and American States, not shown for any other country, is a clear example of [[WP:Systematic bias]]. It also makes it more difficult to compare like data, to see for example, whether the murder rate in USA is higher or lower than that of the UK. Either we should divide every country into administrative regions or we should not divide any. Anything else looks North American-centric. --[[User:Lo2u|Lo2u]] <sup>([[User talk:Lo2u|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lo2u|C]])</sup> 20:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:No it wasn't; with all due respect, I'm unreplacing it. I didn't add other regions because I couldn't find any data on them. If you can find them, by all means add them. Since when is more precise a worse thing? [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 23:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Apologies, I missed your comments. I didn't accuse you of Americocentrism, I only said that it creates that appearance. And I still believe it does. It puts individual American states and provinces on a level with sovereign nations. Also, more precision can be a worse thing. I actually came to this article wishing to compare the murder rates of the UK and the USA. This was made more difficult than it should have been. A map of North America that compares the murder rates of individual states is a useful thing and I'm happy to produce a separate map if you don't want to, which could sit alongside this one. However, very few people will ever wish to know if the murder rate in a particular country is higher or lower than that of an individual American state. They are far more likely to want to compare the USA as a whole. I understand the reason for indicating the individual states, ideally the map would be as precise as the one to the right. But that is a different sort of map. A map that showed murder rates with the closest available precision would not show any borders. Also, the title of this article is "List of '''countries''' by intentional homicide rate" --[[User:Lo2u|Lo2u]] <sup>([[User talk:Lo2u|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lo2u|C]])</sup> 16:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[[Image:Population_density_with_key.png|thumb|60px||Population density]] |
|||
== Rounding up or down? == |
|||
Would it look better if we rounded the numbers instead of having a cluttered list with some countries having one or more fractions and others not? Unless (for example) the figures are the same or one country's rate is given without the fraction so we don't know for sure where it lies in the actual number, give the bias to the country with more murders. I've just done/cleaned up Honduras which somehow had been given Guatemala's murder rates. I may do more if I have time. Any objections? [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 02:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==India in the Records book== |
|||
According to Guinness Records Book, India has most homicides in the world by having 38.000 cases. If Brazil has 50.000 cases, does that not make a world record too? |
|||
== U.S. Virgin Islands == |
|||
The United States Virgin Islands, a US territory consisting of St. Thomas, St. Croix, and St. John, and outlying cays, has a population of around 110,000, with a record 47 (http://www.caribdaily.com/article/198454/v-i-homicides-near-record/) homicides thus far in 2009, and 34 (http://stthomassource.com/content/community/data/2008/01/05/homicides-2008#skip) in 2008. While it is not a "country" per se, a murder rate that rivals Kingston deserves it's own entry, yeah? |
|||
==Guatemala source== |
|||
The source for guatemala homicide rate for the 2008 is actually for Honduras. And it clashes with the value for that same year in Honduras. [[User:Nando.sm|Nando.sm]] ([[User talk:Nando.sm|talk]]) 15:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Vatican City == |
|||
They had 821 people in 2007 and 1 homicide. 100000/821 gives 122 for the homicide rate. I think it was zero for the other years, but I can't verify that. |
|||
Thus the rate for the most recently available year (2007) is 122 per 100000. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.40.152.209|72.40.152.209]] ([[User talk:72.40.152.209|talk]]) 06:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Kenya Death rates 2007 &2008 == |
|||
The deaths during the election period of 2007/2008 would have been huge since there was a big revolt led by Odinga. Convenient to leave that OUT! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.178.121.0|24.178.121.0]] ([[User talk:24.178.121.0|talk]]) 23:45, 27 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Mathematically, the UK figures must be wrong == |
|||
On the table, the latest per capita murder rates for the UK as a whole (2.03) are not equal to the population weighted mean of the rates for Northern Ireland (2.48), Scotland (2.13) and England and Wales (1.37). It's not even close. So at least one of these figures must be wrong.--[[User:Mongreilf|Mongreilf]] ([[User talk:Mongreilf|talk]]) 22:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== I don't care what the source is... == |
|||
There is no way that Indonesia is safer than Canada. I have been to Indonesia extensively and the place is extremely dangerous and ridden with crime & severe poverty. Muggings are routine and the waterways are filled with pirates. This is just a ridiculous claim and this list has absolutely no bearing on reality whatsoever. I mean come-on, Madagascar is safer than Canada? You have to be kidding me. |
|||
Obviously whoever put this list together has never been to any of these places. This list should be revised so that you can provide some insight into which countries have decent reporting and which do not. This list may even inadvertently be putting people at risk who decide to travel to some of these destinations using research they find on this page.[[User:Yogiudo|Yogiudo]] ([[User talk:Yogiudo|talk]]) 13:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:So find a source and fix it. [[Special:Contributions/59.167.194.48|59.167.194.48]] ([[User talk:59.167.194.48|talk]]) 15:10, 13 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
One:the list is only for homocide/murder, not for general safeness, muggings or piracy and certainly not for poverty (which isn't even a crime). |
|||
Two:the list is sourced mostly to UN government crime statistics. It would be better if the list were sourced mostly to government crime statistics. These would be people who not just have been to the country but live there. |
|||
Three:There is actually a problem with the countries' data you mentioned:they are not uptodate. Madagascars' is from 1995 and Indonesia's is from 2000. |
|||
Curious:Were you mugged often in Indonesia? How about your Indonesian friends? [[User:Munci|Munci]] ([[User talk:Munci|talk]]) 20:15, 13 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Swedish statistics == |
|||
I removed the statistics for Sweden. First: Sweden has no statistics on intentional homicide. There is only statistics on the rate of lethal violence (murder, manslaughter and assault with lethal results put together). Secondly, the table mixed numbers of crimes originally reported as suspected lethal violence (most of the figures) and the number of actual deaths by lethal violence. The discrepancy between these numbers, as could clearly be seen in the table, is over 100%. As can be seen on page 60 in [http://www.bra.se/extra/measurepoint/?module_instance=4&name=D%F6dligt%20v%E5ld&url=/dynamaster/file_archive/081215/a8c2f953d90ba23d3114310701dbc899/BU%255fdodligt%255fv%255fld.pdf#search=%27d%C3%B6dsorsak%27 Brottsutvecklingen i Sverige fram till år 2007], the cases of actual deaths resulting from lethal violence in Sweden has hovered around 100 for decades, and the trend has been a downwards one since cirka 1990. As can also be see, the number of cases where the initial suspicion is lethal violence has gone up radically, and is much higher. -<font face="Script" size="4">-[[User:Reign of Toads|<span style="color:maroon">'''Reign'''</span>]] [[User:Reign_of_Toads/talk|<span style="color:black">'''of'''</span><span style="color:olive"> '''Toads'''</span>]] </font> 11:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I added statistics from Sweden. As you are pointing out, there is no statistics on intentional homicide. However it is pointed out in the article that comparative analysis should be done carefully. The two best sources are SCB's death register [http://www.scb.se] and the reported number of crimes from BRÅ [http://www.bra.se]. I think that it's good to show an approximation even if it is an overestimation. /[[User:Eribro|Eribro]] ([[User talk:Eribro|talk]]) 17:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Frustrated == |
|||
I spent an age carefully creating a 2009 column last week with data for several countries and someone's gone and removed it. Undo's are blocked it's confusing to edit manually. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 10:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Where's Sweden on the list? == |
|||
Is Sweden intentionally deleted from the list of whát? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.192.43.147|88.192.43.147]] ([[User talk:88.192.43.147|talk]]) 11:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I looked at the list underneath Northern Ireland. Sweden must be in the +5 category. Lets hope its not 10.([[Special:Contributions/83.108.31.145|83.108.31.145]] ([[User talk:83.108.31.145|talk]]) 23:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)) |
|||
== Guatemala data for 2007-2008 - not 2008-2009 like I stated in summary == |
|||
Also thanks for restoring the 2009 column (see my 'frustrated' section above). [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 10:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Americas versus South, Central, North America Statistics == |
|||
I am confused about the statistics for "The Americas" versus South America, Central America, and North America. One would think that the stat for the Americas would be the average of South, Central and North America, but it is not. What are the mathematics behind those numbers? |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/24.255.137.23|24.255.137.23]] ([[User talk:24.255.137.23|talk]]) 23:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
- This is not surprising since there are more people in North America, that in South America and Central America together. |
|||
North A - about 530,000,000 |
|||
Central - about 40,000,000 |
|||
South - about 330,000,000 |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/85.64.226.179|85.64.226.179]] ([[User talk:85.64.226.179|talk]]) 14:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Israel 2009 the rate should be 1.81 to 1.83 not 1.87 == |
|||
128 people were murdered in Israel in 2008 |
|||
135 people were murdered in Israel in 2009 |
|||
Look here (its in Hebrew) for the word רצח |
|||
http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/045/308.html |
|||
The population in Israel was 7373000 on January 2009 |
|||
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3647231,00.html |
|||
and 7465500 on September 2009 |
|||
http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%9C |
|||
This leads to a murder rate of 1.81 or 1.83 on 2009, I think. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/85.64.226.179|85.64.226.179]] ([[User talk:85.64.226.179|talk]]) 14:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== 2010 national U.S. Homicide Rate % == |
|||
Do we have a murder rate national average for 1/2010 to 8/2010 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/153.31.113.21|153.31.113.21]] ([[User talk:153.31.113.21|talk]]) 13:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Russia 2009 == |
|||
The source for Russian homicide statistics (http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/2009/demo/edn12-09.htm) shows 14.9 per 100,000 in 2009. Why is it shown as 15.6 in the article? If some other source was used then why the reference isn't listed? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Enivid|contribs]]) 19:57, 17 August 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Changed to 14.9 since no one gave a reason for the 15.6 number. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Enivid|contribs]]) 07:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
upd: |
|||
Stats taken from gov. website. According to stats murder rate fell 50% in the past ten years, while corruption increased ten-fold accompanied by disintegration of social institutions in Russia. All gov. media in Russia is strictly censored to present power structures in favorable light. Some would argue that Russia has de facto collapsed between 2002 and 2007. Numbers are obviously fixed, other sources needed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.205.215.25|74.205.215.25]] ([[User talk:74.205.215.25|talk]]) 15:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Bogus election year Venezuela numbers == |
|||
A claim of 19,133 murders in Venezuela is being used to claim a current "murder rate" of 75 per 100,000 in Venezuela. This originates from an El Nacional story claiming to have obtained a "secret survey" that supports such a number: http://www.el-nacional.com/www/site/p_contenido.php?q=nodo/150260/Sucesos/19.133-personas-fueron-asesinadas-en-Venezuela-en-2009 |
|||
This alleged survey (the government has never published it or any number from it, despite LAHT's absurdly misleading headline) is a sample survey in which 20,055 houses were allegedly surveyed. This number of 19,133 then is apparently the central <i>estimate</i> derived by extrapolating that sample somehow to the entire nation. Anyone who understands statistics or sampling knows that such a procedure requires there to be an error margin. Since this is a "secret survey", nobody knows its methodology, distribution of deaths in the sample, or anything else that would enable the calculation of appropriate error bounds. An appropriate estimate could be 5,000 - 29,000, with "19,133" merely being the central estimate in the range. In fact, there's no way to know if this was even a random sample in the first place, and so no way to know whether any kind of extrapolation is appropriate AT ALL. |
|||
None of the other murder rates listed on the page are derived (i.e., concocted, fabricated) in this way. This is not an actual murder rate. It is someone's back of napkin extrapolation of some alleged sample survey which used an unknown methodology.... just coincidentally appearing in the run up to elections in Venezuela... surprise. This ridiculous figure is not a legitimate murder rate, it is unfounded and unsupported, and is completely inconsistent with the way all other countries' figures are derived in the table. In sum, it does not belong in this table.[[Special:Contributions/78.109.180.8|78.109.180.8]] ([[User talk:78.109.180.8|talk]]) 16:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Are there any other studies? I've heard many others stories doing statistics on the murder rate in Venezuela that also gave incredibly high numbers. For the time being, I support your removal, but perhaps we can have official and unofficial statistics in the form of a range? Additionally, there are many countries around the world whose government I would trust to be honest with such information - Venezuela is near the bottom of those at the moment (with all due respect to Mr. Chavez, dissent in his country can often mean losing one's economic status or jail). I would support adding two figures for many countries (e.g., China, Zimbabwe). [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 09:17, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:The official government publication by the Instituto Nacional de Estadística is available at [[http://infovenezuela.org/encuesta-INE-inseguridad.pdf]]. The chapters that precede the survey results clearly spell out the methodology (complete with error margins) employed by the statisticians for the 2009 data. The 75 per 100,000 rate is not "unfounded and unsupported," as is claimed. Nor is it "coincidentally appearing in the run up to elections." Why would a body controlled by Chávez Frías (the INE) want to undermine his regime? [[Special:Contributions/70.185.101.150|70.185.101.150]] ([[User talk:70.185.101.150|talk]]) 07:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::That is not an "official government publication". "infovenezuela.org" is an opposition blog of some sort, and its publications are not "official government" ones. It is a report of some sort about a sample survey that appears, at least, to have been done by a part of the government, but it has never been published or endorsed by any part of the government. The "75 per 100,000 rate" does not appear anywhere in this report, and it does not give "error margins" for any such rate either. Even if it did it would be irrelevant to this page because it would only be a point <i>estimate</i> derived from a sample of 6,000 houses in Venezuela. That is not how the murder rates in this table are derived for the other countries in the table. There should be a close eye kept on any attempted changes to the table until after the elections in Venezuela in September, as there is a concerted propaganda campaign going on with regard to real or imagined murder rates in Venezuela and so many editors will appear who wish to move Venezuela to the top spot on the list by dubious means, such as here converting some unpublished sample survey into an estimated rate and pretending this is somehow official or a legitimate number to use in this table.[[Special:Contributions/78.109.180.8|78.109.180.8]] ([[User talk:78.109.180.8|talk]]) 09:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Agreed. We can't start putting small samples over actual body counts across entire countries - however imperfect those body counts may be. For whatever reason, Venezuela is indeed missing some intentional homicides as the 49 per 100,000 source indicates e.g. prison killings, justifiable homicides by police and crimes of passion. I'm not sure why that is and I have no idea whether that would add 25 per 100,000 on but it still says 49 per 100,000 and that's the figure we should stick with. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 10:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:: It seems like such exclusions are common among official murder statistics, not just Venezuela. Here is a quote from the webpage of the FBI on the US murder statistics: "Justifiable homicide ... Because these killings are determined through law enforcement investigation to be justifiable, they are tabulated separately from murder and nonnegligent manslaughter." (http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/offenses/expanded_information/homicide.html) I'm not sure whether US statistics exclude prison killings, which would probably not be very significant in a statistical sense, and i'm not sure what would qualify as "crimes of passion" in this context, but it does not seem like such qualifications are unique to crime statistics for Venezuela. This would need to be compared to other countries in some detail. How sample surveys measure such things may be different from one survey to the next, depending on their definitions and the particular wordings of the questions. And we can see from polls that different central figures from these can vary widely from one poll to the next, and from one polling firm to the next. Such results must always be seen as estimates, which at best give a range of probable numbers, not any single true number or rate.[[Special:Contributions/78.109.180.8|78.109.180.8]] ([[User talk:78.109.180.8|talk]]) 23:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
I agree. |
|||
Just to extend on some intentional homicides not being included in Venezuela's numbers, I don't know why I mentioned justifiable homicides should be included as some countries include them - others don't. Honduras, South Africa and Colombia put them in with murders while Jamaica, Venezuela (apart from an excellent PROVEA link which unfortunately is now dead) and, indeed, the US tabulate them seperately. This makes the list slightly uneven but not so much that one can completely dismiss the order of countries. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 17:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
There's a problem indeed but I believe that INCOSEC numbers shouldn't be taken in count because (i) they're based on a 1,500 households survey and (ii) INCOSEC took them out of their listing in their website. On the other hand, I don't understand why the INE report provided by Infovenezuela should be discredited since it's a reproduction of a INE report (National Stats Institute) which may not be online in the INE's webpage, but still is a document from an official institute. I believe that INE (even reported by Infovenezuela and the main newspaper in the country (El Universal)) is a more trustable source than INCOSEC which examines 30 times less households for its survey. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Baclavah13|Baclavah13]] ([[User talk:Baclavah13|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Baclavah13|contribs]]) 17:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
INCOSEC numbers for Venezuelan murder rates haven't been endorsed by any official institution in Venezuela. Moreover, this is a completely unofficial association which bases its numbers on a 1,500 household survey. On the other hand, the INE numbers published in the site Infovenezuela and in two of the main newspapers of the country are a lot more reliable. It's not because the government hasn't put its last report online that the report doesn't exist. The report comes from the National Statistics Institute of the country. If this report is not acceptable, there's no way INCOSEC's report is acceptable [[User:Baclavah13|Baclavah13]] ([[User talk:Baclavah13|talk]]) 16:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Baclavah13 |
|||
== Spain on the map == |
|||
The homicide rate shown for Spain on the map is wrong. According to the table, the most recent (2008) HR is 1.2, but on the map Spain is colored in the 2-5 range. [[User:Frimmin|Frimmin]] ([[User talk:Frimmin|talk]]) 05:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Listing second level divisions == |
|||
I'd like to add some second level divisions to this table. I currently have sourcing for US, Mexico, UK, Australia, and Canada. I do have the sourcing, although I'd be glad to add more. What I would do is underneath each country, put an indent with the second level subdivisions. For example (<small>''The data is in this table is totally made up''</small>): |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" |
|||
|- |
|||
|{{flagcountry|Canada}}||<ref>empty</ref> |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.59 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.67 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.67 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.74 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.95 |
|||
|style="background:#4040ff;color:#ffffff;"|2.05 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.86 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.80 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.83 |
|||
| |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.83 |
|||
|- |
|||
| {{flag|Northwest Territories}}||<ref>empty</ref> |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.59 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.67 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.67 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.74 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.95 |
|||
|style="background:#4040ff;color:#ffffff;"|2.05 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.86 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.80 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.83 |
|||
| |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.83 |
|||
|- |
|||
| {{flag|Ontario}}||<ref>empty</ref> |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.59 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.67 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.67 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.74 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.95 |
|||
|style="background:#4040ff;color:#ffffff;"|2.05 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.86 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.80 |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.83 |
|||
| |
|||
|style="background:#8080ff;"|1.83 |
|||
|} |
|||
While I realize that the title of this page is ''by country'', I think more information is always better. What do you think? [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 19:33, 18 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
I will take the lack of response as a lack of opposition and I'm going to add the subdivisions. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 16:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Is the user who keeps reverting my additions going to talk about this here or just keep reverting me? [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 00:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Ive been telling you here that it is better to creat special separate articles for every country, since the table gets uncomprehensible and extremely long if we put every province of every country. |
|||
:[[User:Kardrak|Kardrak]] ([[User talk:Kardrak|talk]]) 04:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Im not against this kind of information, in fact i believe is a great aportation, but in a separate place, thats why i created the Mexico's states murder rate article [[Homicide rates in Mexico by state]]. Even your original table was incomplete, since the state of [[Chihuahua]] was missing. |
|||
:[[User:Kardrak|Kardrak]] ([[User talk:Kardrak|talk]]) 04:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
The problem is that for some countries (e.g., Australia), there just aren't enough states for this to be relevant. Maybe we could put the information ''below'' the main table, and even make it a collapsible table? Or create just one separate article [[List of countries by intentional homicide rate/subdivisions]]? And I'll update Chihuahua, not sure how I missed it. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 02:52, 23 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
If yo can make it collapsible im agree keeping the tables here, but if its not possible, then you should create one single article for all subdivisions. |
|||
[[User:Kardrak|Kardrak]] ([[User talk:Kardrak|talk]]) 09:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== USA MAJOR MISTAKE: GIORGIA == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
I just want to point out that under the USA, the state of Giorgia is messed up, as it gives the country of Giorgia instead. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Martinelli95|Martinelli95]] ([[User talk:Martinelli95|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Martinelli95|contribs]]) 18:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Thanks; I've fixed it. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 19:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Mexico violent death ONLY 10.6 IN 2009, new study == |
|||
On: |
|||
http://www.alianzacivica.org.mx/guia_transparencia/Files/pdf/seguridad/2_INFORMACIONSOBREINCIDENCIADELICTIVA/incidenciadelictivaviolencia2009CIDAC.pdf |
|||
Found very different information for Mexico, actually the Violent death Rate in 2009 is 10.6 according to these source. |
|||
It is a reliable study made by CIDAC.ORG based on SNSP (Mexico's National system for public security) |
|||
This study is also backed by "consulta Mitofski" a internationally known and very trusted statistical source: |
|||
http://72.52.156.225/Estudio.aspx?Estudio=indice-delictivo-cidac <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/189.169.118.4|189.169.118.4]] ([[User talk:189.169.118.4|talk]]) 05:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Yes, the rate is 10.6 in 2009 and this is the correct link to the information: |
|||
:http://www.cidac.org/vnm/pdf/pdf/IncidenciaDelictivaViolencia2009.pdf |
|||
:The data table that was used to rank Mexico is very poor of information. This is much more complete. Please edit the article.--[[User:OyashiroSama|oyashirosama]] ([[User talk:OyashiroSama|talk]]) 01:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Those are for they year 2008, not 2009. The study was only released in August 2009. [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]]) 13:03, 6 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Yes, you're talking about 2008. 10.6 per 100,000 would be 11 per 100,000 if rounded. Basically, 1 per 100,000 lower than the 12 per 100,000 which I believe in another ICESI document available on site was 11.6 - rounded to 12 in the document here. Hardly any difference. Unfortunately, the murder rate increased 25% to 15 per 100,000 in 2009 and again increased significantly in 2010. |
|||
ICESI are hardly a poor source. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 09:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Mexico == |
|||
The way the press is sounding statistics I have to wonder where Mexico falls in the list? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/38.104.12.46|38.104.12.46]] ([[User talk:38.104.12.46|talk]]) 17:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I dont speak english very well and i dont exactly understand what is the correct sense/direction of that question, but i interpretate that you are questioning the information, basing you on your own perception.--[[User:OyashiroSama|oyashirosama]] ([[User talk:OyashiroSama|talk]]) 01:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
The issue with Mexico is the majority of homicides occur in a few high crime areas (Chihuahua, Nuevo Leon, Guerrero, Michoacan). 20% of Mexico's homicides in 2010 occurred in Ciudad Juarez! Overall, Mexico's murder rate is moderately high by world standards (close to Russia), but in a few zones, it is much higher. Still, Venezuela and Colombia have much higher national rates. [[Special:Contributions/64.134.148.109|64.134.148.109]] ([[User talk:64.134.148.109|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 21:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Peru and Costa Rica == |
|||
It looks like the source for Peru's 2009 data is missing. While Costa Rica has a source for its 2009 data, it looks to be 11.3, not 11. Or am I missing something? |
|||
[[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]]) 07:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Since no one offered an alternative solution, I've updated both data. [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]]) 14:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
=="Intentional"?== |
|||
Is there such a thing as an "accidental homicide"? <font family="Comic sans">[[User:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:green">Corvus cornix</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:Green">talk</span>]]''</sub></font> 21:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Yes, why not? Some countries have "murders by accident" in their reports. [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]]) 18:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Many homicides are unintentional. The title is aimed at cutting out countries that may include a kind of culpable homicide that isn't intentional such as motor vehicle or workplace accidents. In terms of intentional deaths, some countries include killings in self-defense while others don't, though I suspect the order would be very similar if all countries added them together. Intentional homicide, rather than just murder or homicide, is the most fitting description. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 09:17, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Indonesia == |
|||
Indonesia has a high Murderrate.. |
|||
I was born there and have been on vacation there. |
|||
And trust me, there are more then 5 murders a day... |
|||
There is a 2 hour crime news program about all the crime that have occured that day, every day. |
|||
Ive seen multiple assasination, shoot out with drug dealers and Police and rape cases.. |
|||
You see the bodies nd everything. |
|||
And since I'm an Indonesian immigrant livin in the Netherlands, its hard to believe its saver there then here.. |
|||
The most famous hitman here is Indonesian.. Jesse Remmers ... |
|||
Ive been incarcerated in the Bijlmer Bajes, wich is the most famous prison located in the most impoverished place in Holland, And I was the only Indonesian who havnt murdered someone.. |
|||
My fathers criminal organisation is well known for murders, drug trafficking and trafficking/smuggling of persons.. Ive done all kinds of things varying from stabbing and armed robberies with pistols.. dealing drugs etc.. Indonesians are a pretty bad ass folk.. |
|||
Javanese, were even prohibited to be enslaved because we were causing trouble all the time... |
|||
And a lot of sites say Indonesia's Murderrate is 8.9 |
|||
Its not something to be proud of, but 0.7 ??? thats like imposible.. |
|||
The World Health Organisation says its 8.9.. |
|||
It is plausible to hear that Indonesia has more then 20.000 murders, That means it has more murders then lets say, Mexico.. for me its a good thing, because I like Mexicans.. |
|||
I had sex with a Mexican gall, And dont like the fact they r banging on another.. |
|||
Indonesia is infact more dangerous then the US.. Because in Indonesia they r mobbing and burning and looting pillaging and murdering eachother every day round there.. where in America its called a Riot.. In Indonesia its called daily upheavel or unrest, even civil war.. or war for independence is ocuring daily in Indonesia.. |
|||
Conclusion is, there is a lot of headhunting in the outer provinces.. Like in Aceh, Borneo, North-Central Sulawesi, Southern Maluku Islands, and Western Papua.. |
|||
But there is a also a lot of gangster shit going on in Greater Jakarta Region and East Java.. |
|||
Ever seen the program Locked Up Abroad in Indonesia ?? That shit is wild.. Lots of Violent Deaths... |
|||
*http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2009/oct/13/homicide-rates-country-murder-data |
|||
*http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014746.html |
|||
Please, don't forget to sign your comments with four tildes. As to the argument. You'll need to provide a direct link to the WHO data showing 8.9 murder rate for 2004, not via Guardian. The link should be referenced in the article itself and not the talk page or the comment to your edit. You should read how to edit Wikipedia correctly before doing new edits. [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]]) 09:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== East and South-East Asia == |
|||
According to the WHO, East and South-East Asia has a Higher Murderrate then its stated before.. |
|||
Look... These r the rates from the year 2004.. |
|||
# Philippines - 21 |
|||
# North Korea - 18.9 |
|||
# Cambodia - 18.5 |
|||
# Burma - 15.7 |
|||
# Mongolia - 13.1 |
|||
# East Timor - 11.7 |
|||
# Indonesia - 8.9 |
|||
# Thailand - 8.2 |
|||
# Laos - 5.4 |
|||
# VietNam - 3.8 |
|||
# China - 2.2 |
|||
# South Korea - 2.2 |
|||
# Malaysia - 2 |
|||
# Brunei Darussalam - 1.4 |
|||
# Singapore - 0.5 |
|||
# Japan - 0.5 |
|||
If you add all up and devide you come to 8.4 per 100.000 |
|||
Only countries missing are Taiwan and Tibet.. |
|||
Nepal and Bhutan are considerd to be South Asian Countries.. |
|||
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2009/oct/13/homicide-rates-country-murder-data |
|||
* http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014746.html |
|||
<span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.187.99.130|212.187.99.130]] ([[User talk:212.187.99.130|talk]]) 02:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
You have your math wrong. You can't just add the average values and divide them by the amount of values. Each country has a different population size, so its rate should be weighted accordingly in the total average. The data has also a separate reference, so there is no need to provide any calculations at all. [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]]) 09:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Edit War == |
|||
I don't want to get in edit war but do we do with 212.187.99.130 constantly spoiling Indonesia and overall regional/subregional data? [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]]) 18:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Countries including attempts? == |
|||
I'm a little bewildered as to why countries whose digits include murder attempts are listed. [[User:Power Society|Power Society]] ([[User talk:Power Society|talk]]) 09:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
What do you propose? If it's not possible to find the data excluding attempts, it's better to at least provide data that includes attempts rather than not to provide any data at all. [[User:Enivid|Enivid]] ([[User talk:Enivid|talk]]) 08:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:49, 6 September 2011
The problem with information supplied on Nigeria is that the Nigeria Police tends to depress figures and it might be more reliable if supported with Non Governmental Organizations' Human right and Crime reports as well as local crime journals.
Also, MOST murders may end up being classified as cases of missing persons due to a high rate of ritual kidnaps and murders which are highly covert and syndicated in these parts.