Jump to content

Talk:.sj/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    references check out, I assume good faith for those where my Norwegian isn't up to scratch.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    It says all that needs to be said
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    OK, short and sweet. I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 19:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk (talk) 19:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]