Jump to content

Talk:1937 Pacific typhoon season/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 18:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 01:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing this article. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 01:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my review:

  • In the second storm, you should add "located in Baguio" instead of "in Baguio".
  • For sources provided by newspaperarchive.com, you need to state that they need a subscription.
  • You may need to add rainfall totals from Source 7 (first iteration)
  • More information about the storm in August can be found from Source 7 (second iteration)
  • By "No longer identifiable" you mean "dissipated"?
  • Presumably dissipated, but the source says "After August 15 no trace of the storm could be found over the western part of the Yellow Sea." Now, it could have become extratropical and moved northeastward and the MWR didn't know. The MWR didn't say it dissipated, so I chose not to say that either, not wanting original research. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the 8th TC, you should add the effects to the Philippines.
  • For the 10th TC, you should add that the TC was founded in Oshima and went towards the Eastern Sea for a few days/
  • A sentence in "Hong kong typhoon" needs copyediting, instead of "the highest recorded gust at the time at the Hong Kong Observatory", It should be "the highest recorded gust at the time was recorded at the Hong Kong Observatory".
  • Feel like there are some words missing in "A high water mark at Tai Po was estimated at 6.2 metres (20.5 ft)."
  • There are more information in Source 14 (first iteration).
  • Where did you get that the 16th TC turned into a typhoon?
  • The 20th TC needs to be classified as a typhoon stated by a source.
  • Whats "wasurldestimated"?
  • You said "typhon" instead of "typhoon".

Other than these problems, the article is good! Putting this on hold. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 05:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricanehink: Hello? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 10:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, got it! Let me know what you think. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricanehink Everything looks good enough, passing. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.