Talk:1954 Orange Bowl/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation):
b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):
No images, any available? c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass but needs some work:
- a Pass but needs some work:
Please continue to work on this article. Spevw (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)