Talk:1: Nenokkadine/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
I'll have this done today or tomorrow JAGUAR 14:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]- The lead is perfect. I couldn't find any issues here
- A couple of paragraphs in the Plot section could easily be merged in order to improve prose flow. I think the last five paragraphs are fairly short and some of them could be merged
- Belfast is linked twice in the Plot section
- "According to his doctor, if Gautham can hallucinate a person other than the three men he can be treated" - comma needed in between "men" and "he"
- "Antonio Rosarios, a Goa-based crime boss who wants to kill her because she tried to expose the presence of hydrogen cyanide in seeds sold by AG1 (his company)" - who's company? Rosarios?
- "Gautham learns that the aged taxi driver he met previously is really a businessman" - remove 'really', sounds a tad informal
- "Rathnavelu shifted from chrome to black-and-white to full colour in sync with the story's mood" - synchronisation
- "The next schedule, which began on 18 June, filmed in London and Belfast for 60 days" - delink London and Belfast here, both are already linked previously in the article
- "Rathnavelu called the action scene in a London 'parking lot" - car park
- "1: Nenokkadine received generally-negative reviews from critics" - why is there a hyphen here? I use "generally negative/positive" without the hyphen, it should be fine to lose it
- No dead links
On hold
[edit]Is this a one I should watch? I remember watching the trailer and I can understand why some of the reviews are negative. The article is great, it is well written, well sourced and I couldn't find one issue with any of the sources. Once all of the minor points above are addressed, I'll be happy to promote this! JAGUAR 21:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Jaguar: 1: Nenokkadine is a case of wasted opportunities. Except for some four or five sequences, nothing actually impress us and it is its inherent issue. But what i loved was its intermission sequence and the fight in the car park. Anyways, thanks for reviewing the article, Jaguar. I've addressed the issues and i hope it is good to go now. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing them, Pavan! Without further ado I'll pass this. Another excellent article. I really enjoy Telugu films, and I've started to watch them more than American films in recent months. It's a long story, but I'm slowly ignoring all of the recent commercial films. I'll take your advice and won't watch this film, though it's a shame that they wasted such good opportunities such as great shooting locations such as London. JAGUAR 22:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)