Jump to content

Talk:1st Airlanding Brigade (United Kingdom)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 23:25, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The article is well written and follows a good style throughout.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References are well used.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images are within the public domain and have succinct captions.
  7. Overall: A very interesting read. Good work. Harrison49 (talk) 22:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail: