Talk:200 (South Park)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have read through the article and it is very well done.

My only complaints are some of you wikilink that are too obscure, such a linkin goo to Butt Out which really isn't helpful.
- I removed that one and a few others. Let me know if there are any others, or feel free to remove any yourself if you object to them. — Hun ter Ka hn 21:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, sometimes the text requires prior knowledge, like "Connor resumes his guise as Jennifer Lopez" when the reader might know nothing about this guise or what it entails.
- I've made some additions to the plot summary to add more context for people who hadn't previously seen the show. This include the bits about Mitch Connor, the Gingers, Mecha-Streisand, depictions of Muhammad, and others. Let me know if you think more should be added. — Hun ter Ka hn 21:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that the episode is filled with inside jokes from past episodes, but I feel the text should make sense to the reader.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: Well written

B. MoS compliance: Complies with the basic MoS
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: Sources are reliable

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: Sets the context

B. Focused: Remains focused on topic
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: Pass!