Talk:2011 Irish presidential election/GA2
GA Review 2[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Noleander (talk · contribs) 11:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
I'll review this. --Noleander (talk) 11:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Tick list[edit]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Discussion[edit]
- IP, I see there was a prior GA review at Talk:Irish presidential election, 2011/GA1, in Dec 2011, and it failed. Can you tell me what specific changes were made to the article since then to bring it up to GA status? --Noleander (talk) 11:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Also, it looks like you also nominated the article the first time; yet in that first GA, you did not respond to questions posted by the GA reviewer. What was the issue there? --Noleander (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to fail this. The article may meet GA criteria, but the nominator has an obligation to participate in the review process. --Noleander (talk) 21:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- The small number of issues raised look to have been addressed so I guess this should be renominated. --86.40.207.160 (talk) 11:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)