Talk:2011 Tirreno–Adriatico/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Prose good, organization good. I made a few minor copy-edits. Complies sufficiently with key MoS elements. I note US English spelling, you might wish to put Template:American English on the talk page.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- References appear RS, support the cited statements, no evidence of OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Sufficient detail without unnecessary trivia.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Captioned and licensed OK
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: