Talk:2013 Tour de France/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Just some small things left to do:

Race overview, first paragraph: On stage 2, I don't quite understand what you mean by Bakelants attack a late breakaway. Did he attack from a late breakaway or did he break from the peloton late?
Second paragraph: How did Gerrans ensure the yellow jersey for Impey?

Good work! On hold for now. Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done both. Bald Boris 00:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]