Talk:2015 Tour of Chongming Island World Cup/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 01:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a couple of Featured List candidates, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship and NWA World Historic Welterweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated. MPJ-US 01:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Toolbox

I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.

Peer review tool

How about moving the picture of the winner up into the info box?
It's not a picture of the race, so I don't think that would be appropriate. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations Tool

No problems Y

Disambiguation links

No problems Y

External links

The link "Chongming Island World Cup 2015" is dead
Wayback Machine archive linked. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Giorgia Bronzini Wins the Tour of Chongming Island World Cup!" - seems to not work either
Ditto. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well Written

So the lead does not actually state that this is a cycling race, it's somethig the reader has to infer from the various references made
Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"event, and a single-stage event" does not need the comma
Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"years, and started" again no need for a comma
Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"ninety degree" should be "ninety-degree"
Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources/verifiable

Is "velofocus" a reliable source?
The rest look reliable etc.

Broad in coverage

There is no follow up on the race, no reviews or opinions on the race? was it boring? Uneventful? did it make a different to the 2015 standings overall? Put it in perspective please.

Neutral

No problems Y

Stable

No problems Y

Illustrated / Images

No problems Y

@Harrias: - That's my complete review, not a ton of issues. I am putting the article on hold for up to 7 days to allow for updates to be made. MPJ-US 02:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrias: no activity in five days. If still nothing in 2 days i will have to fail it. MPJ-US 17:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MPJ-DK, Harrias has indicated that he's not going to be around much at present. I'll do my best to sort your concerns out, though it's possible I won't get to it in the next couple of days. Relentlessly (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relentlessly - I would like to see some activity on this by tomorrow to justify keeping the review open. MPJ-US 12:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry to hear there's such a rush, MPJ-DK. I'll need to do some research for some of it, but I've responded to what I could do immediately above. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Relentlessly - I did not mean to imply it all had to be done, but it had sat inactive for a while and I wanted some activity at least to make sure this had not been forgotten. MPJ-US 14:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upon rereview I believe this is now a Good Article. MPJ-US 18:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]