Talk:2015 Tour of Oman/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
There was one dead link, which I fixed myself.
- As usual, I would ask you to add a word into the caption of the photos about when they were taken, since they are not from the event itself.
- In the last paragraph, the notion "one of the great cyclists of the twentieth century" about Merckx does not sound very neutral. At the very least, you should give a source of someone who calls him that.
- I see that there are no final result tables, espacially considering the other classifications. Where you unable to find those results?
Generally, another very good article about a 2015 cycling race that is just minor steps away from that little green plus. :) Cheers, Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review, Zwerg Nase. I've made some changes – have they dealt with your concerns? Relentlessly (talk) 14:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- I might a slight change at the end myself, I now consider everything taken care of and will give it a pass. Congratulations and thank you for your continuing work on cycling articles! Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)