Talk:2016 E3 Harelbeke/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
I will review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Some things left to do here:
- At the end of the first paragraph, you need to make it clearer that Kwiatkowski is comparing himself a year before with Sagan when saying that it is "very difficult" with the pressure of the rainbow jersey.
- You also need to make the expression "without legs" clearer. Maybe don't use the quote at all and rather paraphrase it.
- Also, you use the word "said" too often in that section. Try to find some synonyms to make it a more enjoyable read.
- The article could also use another photo, maybe one in the favorites section, or one of the eventual winner in the race summary or post-race section.
Sorry this took so long. I should be through all four reviews by tomorrow. On hold for now. Good job so far! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Since the nominator does not appear to be coming back, I have made the changes myself. Passed for GA. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)