Jump to content

Talk:2021 Bahamas Bowl/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

[edit]

Teams

[edit]

Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders

[edit]

Toledo Rockets

[edit]

Game summary

[edit]

Pre-game

[edit]

First half

[edit]

Second half

[edit]

Scoring summary

[edit]
  • Good

Statistics

[edit]
  • Good

References

[edit]
  • I used a script to fix some dashes, so now everything looks good formatting-wise
  • SB Nation is not the best source; if another reference can be found, I'd prefer those be swapped in

General comments

[edit]
  • No images, so those criteria cannot be assessed
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig copyvio score looks good

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and please let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 22:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making those changes! The script I ran to fix the other dash issues also picked up the ones I noted earlier, so everything looks good, and I'm happy to give this article a pass! — GhostRiver 19:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]