Jump to content

Talk:28th Battalion (Australia)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 19:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Progression

[edit]
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

[edit]
  • Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals no errors with reference consolidation (no action req'd).
  • Disambiguations: no dab links [3] (no action req'd)
  • Linkrot: external links check out [4] (no action req'd)
  • Alt text: All images use alt text [5] (no action req'd).
  • Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool reveals no issues with copyright violations or close paraphrasing [6] (no action req'd).
  • Duplicate links: one duplicate link to be removed:
    • battle honours  Done

Criteria

[edit]
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • typo here..."who had been intended to a sub unit within the 24th..." (to provide / to form?)
    • this seems a little awkwardly worded: "...the final decision to evacuate was still to be made and so the 7th Brigade was dispatched in early September..." (particularly "and so").
    • Repeated phrasing here: "At this time, the AIF was reorganised and expanded in preparation for future operations. Two new infantry divisions were formed at this time..." ("at this time" twice in proximity).
    • repeated word here: "...based in East Perth with sub-units based at Albany..." (based twice, perhaps just delete the second instance?)
      • All  Done
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Article is well referenced with all major points cited to WP:RS.
    • No issues with OR that I could see.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • No issues I could see, covers all major points without unnecessary detail.
    • In the lead "...before seeing action against the Japanese in the New Britain campaign..." Maybe just add the year this occurred for context?  Done
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
    • No issues I could see.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    • No issues here.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
    • Images all seem to be free / PD and have the req'd information / templates.
    • Captions seem ok.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:28th_Battalion_(Australia)/GA1&oldid=604953878"