Talk:3 (Britney Spears song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: --Legolas (talk2me) 09:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Unreliable source Digital Spy is used. Either replace or remove. --Legolas (talk2me) 11:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hi all, I will be reviewing this article against the GA criteria. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Well here goes the review,
- Lead
Done
- of the album -> comma after album
- critical appreciation -> remove critical, the word critic is there afterwards
- breaking many chart records -> either specify or remove
- MErge the leftover third para with this one. Single lines don't constitute separate paras.
- Background
Done
- comma after Max Martin and Stockholm
- comma after lead single and Singles Collection
- Composition
Done
- with classical Max Martin synths --> doesnot make sense, classical Max Martin?
- from C4 to C5 --> no sense to the non-adapt user, try something like high-tome of C4 to the lower register of C5
- Ref 7 to Musicnotes.com --> remove the url from the citation as per discussion at WP:RSN. Do it something like that in "Bad Romance" or "Telephone".
- four-on-the-floor --> remove redirect and explain what it is in short.
- song's lyrics are about --> is about
- compared to the songs in Prince’s Dirty Mind --> Exemplify, compared to the songs in Prince’s 1980 studio album Dirty Mind.
- playground chant --> wikify
- Critical reception
Done
- Remove Digital Spy
- and racy lyrics and compared --> two consecutive "and" --> and racy lyrics, while comparing it
- compared to Madonna’s "Celebration", --> give the year after the song name
- Lamb would later name it --> Lamb later named it
- Chart performance
Done
- number one single --> number-one single
- of a song ever reaching number one in the chart --> for a song reaching the top of the Billboard Hot 100
- by the ARIA with --> make ARIA in full-form
- remarkable --> fails WP:PEACOCK
- Music Video
Done
- a sneak peak of the video in images was released --> not sure what it means, rephrase
- A countdown including images and video previews was --> A countdown, including images and video previews, was
- at a vanity --> ???
- in a white background --> in front of a white
- and glasses while surrounded --> comma after glasses
- TRacklisting
Done
- Wrong format basically. It should be like "3" (Instrumental) – 3.33. Please correct them all.
- Remove unreliable source like Amazon and Discogs.
- Credits
Done
- – between names and profession
- Charts
Done
- Remove the certification table, a single one is unnecessary. Add back when the single has been certified in more than two nations, and that too in the format in FA's like "4 Minutes".
- Release history
Done
- Remove Amazon links
- References
Done
- Remove italicization of online sources and chart names
- Czech Airplay chart is published by IFPI so you can link them in ref 45.
- External links
Done
- Both of them fail as per WP:SPAM. Those links donot contribute anything related to the song. Either add such link or remove the section altogether. --Legolas (talk2me) 08:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Just a partial review. Will update the rest tomorrow. --Legolas (talk2me) 11:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I adressed all the concerns. I replaced the external links for the music video in MTV. I also deleted the Digital Spy link from the critical reception section, but left it in the composition section since it describes many elements of the song. Xwomanizerx (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- There are a few unformatted references in the article. The dutchcharts, lescharts, swisscharts, spanishcharts, all should have the proper work parameter and should credit Hung Medien as the publisher. We're almost there. --Legolas (talk2me) 10:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Xwomanizerx (talk) 15:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Looks fine. I'm passing the article. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Xwomanizerx (talk) 15:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- There are a few unformatted references in the article. The dutchcharts, lescharts, swisscharts, spanishcharts, all should have the proper work parameter and should credit Hung Medien as the publisher. We're almost there. --Legolas (talk2me) 10:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)