Talk:A Shot in the Dark (Homicide: Life on the Street)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

• This article has no Reception section, which I think is a major flaw. Xtzou (Talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree. The problem is I haven't been able to find any sources related to the Nielsen ratings or critical reviews for this particular episode. Since the article is still strong in the production aspects, I thought it could still meet GA standards as long as I wasn't actively neglecting any sources that talked about Reception. However, I will probably have access to some better news databases starting tomorrow and will take a closer look to see if I can dig anything up that I might have missed. — Hunter Kahn 19:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Humm. Really? There is nothing? That seems strange, considering the other episodes seem to be well documented. It is a huge omission, but ... if there is nothing nowhere ... Xtzou (Talk) 21:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

• Okay, I will take your word for it, since you apparently have the DVD etc. Otherwise, it is a fine article. Xtzou (Talk) 22:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance: }

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused: }

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 22:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)