From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Occult (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

April 15 Edit[edit]

I made what I consider a mayor change. After referencing some of the content, I actually deleted some of it because it caused the same text to be referenced twice. Once in the same text, and a second time via the footnotes. By eliminating the first and leaving the footnote, I think it has a more encyclopedical style.

Seeking mayor edit[edit]

Okey... i have minor edited the article to comply to Wiki standards... nonetheless I haven't been able to find any reliable source for the unreferenced content... I added the Dictionnaire Infernale as a see-also, but I haven't referenced in the text because I also haven't been able to find the entire text, all I've found is references to it and some paraphrased content. Although, from what I've read I can imply that the unreferenced content does not correspond to that text. The Dictionnaire Infernale by Plancy is most likely to be just a french conjugation of the contents of the Lemegeton and the Pseudomonarchia. I've also found some web pages referring to Agares, but I will not add their content, because I consider that it doesn't comply with the NPOV standard of Wikipedia. So... I may be mayor editing the text to remove the unreferenced content some time soon. --Legion fi 06:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

December 29 cleanup[edit]

Please... DO NOT CHANGE THE CONTENT that is already referenced... It has been checked with the source and changing it would alter the fidelity of the source... also DO NOT ADD UNREFERENCED CONTENT... I will be bold and DELETE ALL UNREFERENCED content that is added on spot... Thanks... --Legion fi (talk) 22:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

February 19 Edit[edit]

Well, this was one of the article i first put my eye on when I came to be a wikipedian. As you can see the other edit was 10 months ago... A lot has happened to me in the meantime. My objective was to have this ready sooner. But I couldn't. So Im retaking that now. About the actual edit. I removed ALL unreferenced content, and correctly referenced the rest. I also re added some sourced content that as MIA due to the vandalism that this page suffered not so long ago. I have checked five sources for this article (two editions of the Dictionnaire Infernal, two editions of the Lemegeton Clavicula Salomonis, and one edition of the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum) and I think this is as far as this can grow, except for the "Popular culture" section. So unless I or any other editor come across a new source (please tell me if you do find one), I think this article is done. It may be time to think about an assessment, and a possible speedy deletion (with my broken-hearth in it) because it may stay as a stub forever. Please contribute to this article if you do find another source. I will be still checking it for vandalism.--Legion fi (talk) 08:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)