Talk:Akuma na Eros

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed summary

Removed summary per WP:CP, as it was a direct copy of this page. Ninja neko 11:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And character description as wel per WP:CP, a translation of this page in Spanish. Ninja neko 13:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability and reviews

Searches in German, Spanish, and Italian under the licensed title, Virgin Crisis, do come up with reviews (and not just seller listings), some of which appear to be potentially reliable sources. Or at least the German and Spanish do -- what little Italian I have is, well, Spanish, and what basic Spanish and German I have is not enough to evaluate whether they are, indeed, reliable. Someone with better skillz should sort through, as it is upon those (and any possible Japanese notice) that the series notability is proven. (I'm startled it hasn't been licensed in French. Maybe they balked at the idea of an English language title.) —Quasirandom (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool (and thanks to this article, I'm now reading this even as I type :P - I wonder if Viz decided against it because of the whole Christian thing, though they certainly didn't balk at Sensual Phrase :P -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect it was the satanic bits, yeah. Or maybe that it isn't as good Sensual Phrase, in the end. :-P —Quasirandom (talk) 03:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, actually, its like a mini version of the same story, complete with the whole memory loss - I'll make you remember me thing :P Finished reading it so I finished putting in the plot. Needs a but of cutting back, but at least its complete now ;-) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was removing the character list protocol? Now I can't find a mention of Beelzeebub to support his inclusion at Beelzebub (disambiguation). Help? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is being done with many shorter series like this since it just repeats the plot over again with no additional content. There were some recent discussions at the project MoS about it as well. Beelzebub was a very minor character here...he appeared on like all of 3 pages and played no real role in anything at all, so removing him from the disambig would be fine. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]